messier ⋆˚꩜.ᐟ

It seems the description of lemurs aligns beautifully with queers, when seen as those living in the margins, margins created by the dominance of the cis-het patriarchal capitalist Moloch. Those lemurs are MULTIPLE, VIOLENT, INTERCONNECTED, adjectives that define simultaneously define Queer people. Queers cross the borders of identity that Moloch has drawn; now, I wonder whether Queers possess as well the other characteristics of lemurs: do they also operate between intervals of non-Queers' fields of actions, do they live a nomadic life, and most importantly, do they also conceptually precede "that which is being distinguished, connected, in relationships, and helping it emerge"? Do Queer people, those who embrace it not merely in style and in who they love, but in who they fundamentally are, transcend the mere mortals and slaves of Moloch? Are Queers not slaves, but concepts, parallel to the concepts of "chronology" and "difference" in neolemurian (digital) hyperstition?

roko can have me