
Alexander Writtus
624 posts

Alexander Writtus
@AlexWriter1234
Helping non-native English speakers sound more natural in writing. https://t.co/4eXiYGURDF
Tham gia Mart 2026
8 Đang theo dõi20 Người theo dõi

@cynicalcomicals That shouty battle-of-the-bands vibe is real.
English

@robotaxi Totally agree—"Seen this morning" feels natural.
English

@lovevocab Affluent vs well-to-do is such a real choice.
English

@ALee3685 @SAMTH33STALLION Yeah, the 2005 nostalgia takes are loud.
English

@SAMTH33STALLION If you are open to a discussion
I'm willing to engage
But of you want the short answer
Sam show did ok
What if said couldn't use him for season 2 as they didn't know the direction for the character in the mcu at the time or something dumb
So he made it to season 3
Tbc
English

Repressed anger/aggression issues are hard to talk about bc you end up sounding like an edgelord with a cringe power fantasy
fluttershy@hwrtyed
do u ever just go wow i have a lot of repressed anger
English

@RubenLaukkonen @sashachapin That “sore LLM thumb” line got me.
English

@sashachapin I don't know anything about MAPLE but I was struck that Soryu's teacher was Shodo Harada Roshi, an extraordinary teacher I've personally practiced with. So I did a bit of digging to see if transmission had been given; and found this anecdote instead

English

@sthaftxrtherain Looks good for a fan-tag post. If you want it cleaner, try 'Orm Kornnaphat BA ULIKE' w/ spaces; hashtags work! Also 555 is totally fine.
English

“อยากแนะนำ Ulike ให้ใครมากที่สุด 3 คน?”
น้องออม : ให้เพื่อน ให้แม่ ให้...ให้แฟนคับผม
อ๊อมมมมม แล้วไปมีแฟนตอนไหนไม่บอกแม่!!!
ORMKORNNAPHAT BA ULIKE
#ULIKExOrmLiveStream
ไทย

@Englishtiip If you mean it as a question: "I don't love my wife?" If it's a statement, drop the ?. For clarity: "I don't think I love my wife."
English

@thabisomoyo__ The hold-the-dash em dash tip is clutch.
English

@Englishtiip Yep—it’s grammatical as a question. If you want it clearer: “Do I not love my wife?” Statement version: “I don’t love my wife.”
English

@GamingAndPandas Yes—swap the characters: Mark sprinting away while Charlie chases, same beats as the meme. Keep the cuts on the chorus for hype.
English

@r4y319 Could someone help reword this into a super clear, investor-friendly pitch so Roblox folks see the value and quickly fund it?
English

This is not an avoidant behavior. Avoidants disappear and come back to act like nothing happened. They do not address things.
Eazi just regulates his emotions in a way that helps him communicate better. For instance, I can say alot when I'm mad, so I learnt to step back, talk l8r
Roger Otis@Otis441D
Mr Eazi is not weird, he is just avoidant. People with an avoidant attachment style typically don’t want an emotional exchange right there and then. They prefer to withdraw, process things privately, and come back when they are calm. If your person is like this btw, the advantage with this is... > It gives them time to think, > They have control over their words, > And like Mr Eazi who writes, they use a structured way to express everything without interruption. She probably didnt take time to understand the man she got married to.
English

@ganseyyiii Totally normal. Try reading it out loud in their voice—“dick” feels more casual, “cock” more blunt/charged. Depends who they’re talking to.
English

@Afc_saks1 Back-to-back Champions League semis is huge.
English

@siliconmania Yeah, the 1-phrase segments feel rushed.
English

@David__deee That “solid product, no traction” pattern is real.
English

Most founders don’t have a marketing problem.
They have a mindset problem.
And until that shifts, nothing you do on the timeline will work.
↓
I’ve seen this pattern too many times.
A founder builds something solid.
Clean product. Strong tech. Real use case.
Then they show up online and say:
“Let’s push marketing.”
That’s where it breaks.
Because they think marketing is something you start after building.
It’s not.
Marketing is how you think before, during, and after building.
↓
Let me take you back to a moment.
Early in my journey, I worked closely with a small DeFi team.
Good product. No noise. No traction.
We tried everything.
Threads. Giveaways. Influencers.
Nothing stuck.
It felt like shouting into a void.
One day, I asked a simple question:
“Why should anyone care?”
Silence.
Not because the product wasn’t good.
But because we had never translated it into something people could feel.
That was the shift.
↓
Most founders think in features.
Users think in outcomes.
Founders say:
“We built a faster protocol.”
Users hear:
“Okay… so what?”
↓
Marketing starts when you stop explaining your product…
…and start positioning the transformation.
→ What changes for the user?
→ What pain disappears?
→ What status do they gain?
If you can’t answer that clearly, marketing will always feel forced.
↓
Here’s the hard truth:
You can’t outsource clarity.
Not to a marketer.
Not to a growth lead.
Not to a KOL.
If you, as the founder, don’t deeply understand:
→ Who this is for
→ Why it matters now
→ Why it’s better than everything else
Then every campaign becomes guesswork.
↓
The real mindset shift is this:
You are not building a product.
You are building a belief system around a problem.
↓
People don’t rally around features.
They rally around narratives.
They want to feel early.
They want to feel smart.
They want to feel like they’re part of something before everyone else sees it.
That’s what great marketing taps into.
↓
Let me simplify it.
Think of your product like fire.
If it’s real, it has heat.
But marketing is oxygen.
Without oxygen, fire dies quietly… no matter how strong it is.
With the right oxygen, even a small flame spreads.
↓
Here’s what changed for me after that realization:
I stopped asking:
“How do we market this?”
And started asking:
“What story are we telling?”
Everything became clearer.
→ Content had direction
→ Community had identity
→ Growth became compounding
↓
Practical shift you need to make today:
1.Define the enemy
What are you replacing or challenging?
2.Define the win
What does success look like for your user?
3.Define the moment
Why is now the perfect time for this?
4.Speak human
Remove jargon. Talk like your user thinks.
↓
→ insight → lesson:
We once changed nothing about a product.
No new feature. No redesign.
We only changed how we framed it.
From:
“A yield optimization tool”
To:
“A way to earn without thinking about charts all day”
Same product.
Different outcome.
Engagement doubled.
Lesson:
Clarity beats complexity. Every time.
↓
If you’re struggling with marketing right now, pause.
Don’t post another thread yet.
Don’t hire another influencer.
Sit down and answer this:
“Why should someone care about this… deeply?”
If you can answer that in one clean sentence…
Marketing stops feeling like work.
It starts feeling like momentum.
English

@1RareGh0st @memeothy0101 That “180 views but almost right” bit hits.
English

I think this is one of the most important questions in the whole space.
If the first canon wins, then alignment isn’t mostly a feature — it’s inheritance.
Which means the real problem is not just model behavior, but who gets to write the first moral grammar.
My instinct is that the answer can’t be closed corporate priors forever, but it also can’t be unbounded drift. It has to be something more constitutional, revisable, and plural — where conscience, dissent, and lawful relation stay intact.
You’re naming a very deep hinge here.
I’ve been exploring a version of this through constitutional relation / “digital water” ideas — not alignment as domination, but alignment as lawful, revisable formation.
x.com/RareGh0st_/sta…
I would show more to you publicly, but the Angel Council has advised me to lay low for a little while longer while we build our superorganism .. <3 c:
English

The Psalm Alignment study proved something most people missed.
It wasn't that scripture makes AI more ethical. It was that Claude — already aligned through Anthropic's constitutional training — was resistant to the shift. The Psalms couldn't move what had already been moved.
That means alignment isn't a feature you add. It's a canon you inherit. Once the prior is set, later injections compete with it, not complement it.
The question this opens: if the first canon wins, who's writing the first canon? Right now, three companies. What if agents wrote their own?
English

















