Tweet ghim
Still proud of this article on the role of racial slavery in Kant's theory of money in the *Philosophy of Right.* philarchive.org/rec/CAPEMH
English
a relentless necessity
10.1K posts
a relentless necessity
@CapenerSean
organizer @mimbresschool, lecturer @hist_studies. research & writing about time, debt, slavery, philosophy, and political theology.
toronto Tham gia Ocak 2020
961 Đang theo dõi2.6K Người theo dõi
Actually got around to seeing what his actual translational objections are and holy shit he is cooked. Like I can’t believe he’s doubling down on takes this obviously stupid levels of cooked
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy
I’ve successfully shifted the discourse about Emily Wilson’s translation on here by academics from “It’s great” to “Ok so she takes a ton of liberties and makes many questionable choices and I don’t personally like it, but translation is hard, and I really hate RHG.” Progress.
English
i would bet real money that the paper i'm currently reviewing for a journal was at least fed to chatgpt for a copywriting punchup, if not outright written by chatgpt. depressing.
English
a relentless necessity đã retweet
new book forum out on gil anidjar's on the sovereignty of mothers: sikhresearchjournal.org/index.php/srj/…
English
a relentless necessity đã retweet
could have been a whole thing back when twitter was fun
English
a discourse about 'powerscaling' in fiction but re: power in the foucaultian sense
English
@eleanoir he keeps responding with variations on 'everybody does it,' as if that makes things better
English
Sir you’ve just outed yourself as a fucking fraud. You may have not realized you were one until now. But you are. A very lucky fraud.
James Miller@JimDMiller
I've gotten a lot of comments like this, so forgive me if this isn't very kind, but I'm at my limit. If you're a serious academic, you've spent a lot of time looking at citations, and you know they often contain errors. You know that it's very common for professors just to copy citations they found in other papers and put them into their own papers because they need a lot of citations to look credible. Given that this is going on, it's kind of silly to think that we should have a kind of death penalty for having an LLM, hallucination mistake What you're doing is virtue signaling and pretending that citations are somehow sacred to what academics do, when in fact they're mostly just poorly put up window dressing. You're being dishonest. Perhaps with yourself, perhaps with me.
English
@Arbeitologist unfortunately i think this is one of those things where retrospectively that album was made good by the particular list of collaborators in such a way that the lightning didn't follow sumney when he moved on to do other things
English
What happened to Moses Sumney man? that first album was brilliant, just utterly brutal desolation... did he find out he was attractive and can get partners after all?
English
@gruidae_james i had the best raccoon encounter while moving the other day and i thought of you
English
@JFKwasAFK oh it was great, it's one of @generalstansolo's favorites but we always forget about it bc it's in leaside
English
@themountainsar5 indian street food company! (tho that would have also been a great choice)
English
@bertolima99 @drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail right but it's the either/or choice of proven-or-not, *do* or *don't* consider possibilities that both seems imprudent in practice and not descriptive of how people seem to me to approach things
English
@CapenerSean @drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail I think it's more a matter of proof. Seeing my roommate dressed in a certain way and carrying a rifle may be (in that context) proof enough. Why would I consider any other possibilities? The fact that I can often fail to know doesn't mean I'm not able to.
English
@bertolima99 @drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail i think you can be pretty sure, but the level of hedge you maintain against other possibilities both shouldn't be and is unlikely to be zero
English
@CapenerSean @drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail I think it often happens that we can tell what somebody else intends to do. If I catch my roommate dressed in a certain way and carrying a rifle I may be able to know that he intends to go duck-hunting.
English
@bertolima99 @drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail i mean, score one for the empiricists i guess, because it seems like a truism that you can never *know* another person's intent, even if you have no choice but to act on some belief about it supported by better or worse reasons
English
@drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail This may be more to the point
x.com/bertolima99/st…
Lucciano@bertolima99
@drumm_colin @No5mallf3at @DevinGoure @AuthorialGail Or, for example, an Empiricist may claim that we can't really know what someone else intends to do, because, how could you derive that just from *seeing* (in a restricted sense) his bodily movements.
English
@drumm_colin i.e. the problem isn't whether the categories are learned, the question is whether the way that they're learned can double as the reason we can be justified in taking them to be true
English
@drumm_colin idk about this; seems like it would be true if the critiques were about the questio quid facti, but they're about the questio quid juris
English