TehWardy

I've never raised a British or English flag in my life but you leftists retards are the dumbest fucks on the internet ... 1. Islamists raping our girls in record numbers, so much so the house of Lords has been questioning Labours ability to police our country. 2. Our grand parents that faught in the wars back when the country was 98% white british and they did so to protect Europe from the fascism running rampant on the left today telling us what we can and criticise and what pets we are allowed to have and most recently sniggering over reports of yet more raping of British girls openly in the commons. Our grand parents didn't fight to have their grand daughters raped and then laughed at for it. 3. I grew up on a street where we all knew everyone and had street parties, I don't know the people next door today because everyone hates everyone and street parties are a crime because someone will always be offended if so much as a dog attends. I also grew up in a britain where family values were key, one income was enough to raise a family and buy a family home. Today we are gaslit and told to pack in the coffee when our grandparents spent 2 to 3 days down the local pub and never seemed to run out of cash for the energy bill. 4. £333 billion on welfare £331 billion in income taxes, britain is broken, every month that gap gets wider and our kids will have to pay it back. 5. So you argue we aren't full then point at the lack of housing debunking your own BS. 6. Labour looks after only non brits, sends all our money offshore, gives territory away so we can rent it and then gives themselves a Pay rise, at least the tories tried to do something to help despite not having MASSIVE majority control of the house like Labour does today. 7. Right idea, poor execution, don't worry, @RupertLowe10 has our backs on that one. 8. Starmer literally lies and avoids questions every week in PMQ's the one event where the people are allowed to hold the PM to account for his work, he's now being called out for it and even Labour MP's are turning on him. He's about as much of a traitor as it gets for a PM. ... I can't wait to see a so called "far right" PM win the next election and tear out everything Labour has done then begin mass deportations of all the illegals so we can reclaim some sanity back in the UK.

8 lines every flag-shagging plastic “patriot” has in their playbook 1.“I want my country back” - From what? You voted for the party that ran it for 14 years. 2.“Our grandads didn’t fight for this” - Your grandads would be ashamed that you can’t find Normandy on a map. They fought with Poles, Sikhs, Gurkhas, and West Indians beside them. They’d have more in common with the immigrants you hate than plastic patriots sharing memes about them. 3.“This isn’t the Britain I grew up in” - Correct. It has lower crime, longer life expectancy, and better healthcare than the 1970s you’re romanticising. You just don’t remember the power cuts and three-day weeks. 4.“Britain is broken” - The most unpatriotic sentence in the English language, repeated daily by people say they love their country. 5. “We’re full” - The Netherlands has twice the population density and somehow manages. The UK is not full. It’s just had 14 years of no housebuilding and you need someone darker than you to blame for it. 6.“We look after our own first” - You vote for parties that cut disability benefits, froze nurses’ pay, gave tax breaks to the rich and closed Sure Start centres. You don’t look after anyone. 7.“Stop the boats” - The Tories spent £700 million on Rwanda to deport four people. Zero boats were stopped. You cheered anyway. 8.“Starmer is a traitor” - The man prosecuted terrorists, paedophile rings, and war criminals as DPP. You import American culture war propaganda from people who openly despise our allies, trash your own country 24/7, and follow convicted fraudsters who lied about where they were born. The only ones treacherously trashing Britain’s reputation daily are you.

@emma_delano20 I'm sorry but what? Tats have never been a good look on a woman. You don't decorate a woman to make her look good.

Be honest… are women without tattoos still attractive to men nowadays?

They had the compute power to run the model at scale, they don't have the compute power to do what they claim Mythos can do in anything but a controlled small subset of selected partners. They've taken the attitude that if they build a massive multi trillion parameter model then purely on neuron count alone it'll just be better. It scales with current thought process but it's not realistic to claim they have something that only they can use as a "product". Bottom line ... it's all hot air and no delivery.

@CoderPW @NinaDSchick But why didn't they do this with 4.6? Or 4 Or 3.7

Claude Mythos. Ten trillion parameters: the first model in this weight class. Estimated training cost: ten billion dollars. On the hardest coding test in the industry (SWE bench) it scores 94%. It found a security flaw in a system that had been running for 27 years, one that every human engineer and every automated check had missed. It found another bug that had survived five million test runs over 16 years. (It did so overnight.) It is so capable in cybersecurity that Anthropic will not release it to the public, instead it is launching Project Glasswing along with 100m in compute credits to help secure software. Only twelve partners currently have access: Amazon, Cisco, Apple, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, JPMorgan Chase, Crowdstrike, Palo Alto, AWS, The Linux Foundation, Broadcom. (I'm sure the Pentagon is on the line?) This is not a product launch: it is a controlled deployment of a system too powerful to distribute freely. Tell me this isn't (very expensive) AGI?

@BohemianAtmosp1 This is what happens when yu vote for socialists. They invent more ways to steal your money.

They can’t keep their hand out of your pocket.

@dread_numen @om_patel5 Open AI is a far better deal

@CoderPW @om_patel5 well yes of course, that's capitalism baby these are all already heavily subsidized, they were always going to do this: get as many people fired as possible, get as many people hooked on AI as possible, then raise then raise the cost or lower the inference ability (same thing)

SOMEONE ACTUALLY MEASURED HOW MUCH DUMBER CLAUDE GOT. THE ANSWER IS 67%. the data shows Opus 4.6 is thinking 67% less than it used to. anthropic said nothing until the numbers went public. then suddenly Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) shows up on the GitHub issue. users are calling it "AI shrinkflation" (same price, less intelligence) we already know from the leaked source code that they have an internal switch that keeps the models working to their full extent for anthropic employees. in the last week Claude went from WOW to being a more restricted and expensive version of ChatGPT. people are saying Anthropic is deliberately downgrading Opus to save compute for training Mythos, their next model.

@moonchild23580 - Loyalty - Peace - Shared goals in life

Men only , serious question Besides sex, what do you really want from women??

@MaxGraftin @GiftCee Well from what it looked like from the recent leftist march they had most of them were likely on something.

@CoderPW @GiftCee Hypnosis

Hypothetically, the race is between (a) Zack Polanski (b) Kemi Badenoch. Who gets your vote?

@Alex_Rogov_js @om_patel5 I was cut off in just 2 hours after paying a monthly sub cost. For a single agent running in a single window on a single task that's a joke!

Same observation here. December was the inflection point. Our CLAUDE.md-driven workflows went from 85% first-try accuracy to ~60%. The GitHub issue #42796 finally got Anthropic's attention but the fix cycle is too slow. We've been compensating with explicit 'think step by step' in system prompts.

But after your energy bill went up £200 they brought it back down by £100 .... so we should thank them! ... oh wait ... iran happened, never mind ... But breakfast clubs!!! ... oh and "Tories, black holes, it wasn't us", bla bla bla. Whoever votes for these morons needs their heads examined.

These people are bleeding us dry

@anmolmoses @AnthropicAI Not only that, you pay through the nose for half a job ... x.com/CoderPW/status…

@AnthropicAI I am not buying it until I try it myself Opus 4.6 was really good when it launched And just yesterday it couldn't solve a single bug that I threw at it

Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing

@oelma__ NRT ... she's gonna be a problem.

What is your first thought when you see a Nose ring?

@Mangemongen @LeslieDixon1952 @Lee_in_Iowa Seems to be ... just trolling.

@CoderPW @LeslieDixon1952 @Lee_in_Iowa It’s a joke account

Boomer here. I bought my first house after ten years of saving like crazy. And the interest was 14.5%. I don’t know where kids got the idea that they were due a house and new car at college graduation, but that’s NOT how it ever was.

@KeviliciousOne @MarindaVannoy1 So sign them all up then just like the men if it's not an issue.

@MarindaVannoy1 A "draft" has not been necessary, for almost 50 years. We have an all-volunteer Army, that serves for longer than draftees per term, so we can spend more time training them, and they are paid well. We have destroyed virtually all of Iran's Air Force and Navy, with zero "draft".

If a draft were to occur, do you think women 18 and older should be included?

We should build a society based on peoples beliefs and voting sentiment. If women vote for equality and support feminist narratives them yes, give them what they want, if they vote for more traditional viewpoints and behave in accordance with that then no. In the UK it seems to me that we have a widening divide between men and women but also a widening gap between the conservate and the liberal mindset. I think people should be held to the standard of their views and judged in accordance with them. So for example ... Liberals are full blown socialists here for the most part, they should therefore pay higher income taxes than conservatives, but conservatives should perhaps pay higher fees for things things like prescriptions or be required to have health insurance to get full access to the NHS. Hold everyone to account for their views and lets see which practices grow and shrink.

@VraserX @Christo31306687 If the non profit buys shares in the for profit the non profit can legally make money from the profits to re-invest until it owns the entire for profit company. That's literally the point to what Open AI originally was.

@Christo31306687 I’m pretty sure that the lawsuit will entail a clause to prevent this.

This is exactly why people are furious. If Elon wins and OpenAI’s for profit side has to funnel $150B into the nonprofit side, that massively slows infrastructure buildout, compute expansion, and model development. Call it whatever you want. In practice, it is an attempt to weaken a competitor.

@VraserX It was literally named "Open AI" from the outset for the same reason he's pumping the money where it should be. If the profiteers can't accept that, that's on them.

@Real_SilverLine @shanaka86 Agreed ... it's not even close to the claims. Given what @AnthropicAI charge for a token though ... Probably not even worth looking at even if they do release it. Only the rich can afford to use it and they already battle for control of the world ... so leave them to it.

@CoderPW @shanaka86 In 2019 OpenAI shouted from the rooftops how scary GPT-2 was and sounded all the alarms AI marketing is fake and gay

JUST IN: Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 converts vulnerabilities into working exploits approximately zero percent of the time. That is the model you are paying for right now. Their latest model “Mythos” converts them 72.4 percent of the time. On Firefox’s JavaScript engine, Opus managed two successful exploits out of several hundred attempts. “Mythos” managed 181. Ninety times better. One generation. Nobody trained it to do this. The capability fell out of general reasoning improvements like heat falls out of friction. Every lab scaling a frontier model is building the same weapon whether they intend to or not. Let that land. “Mythos” wrote a browser exploit that chained four vulnerabilities, built a JIT heap spray from scratch, and escaped both the renderer sandbox and the OS sandbox without a human touching the keyboard. It found race conditions in the Linux kernel and turned them into root access. It wrote a 20-gadget ROP chain against FreeBSD’s NFS server, split it across multiple packets, and granted unauthenticated remote root to anyone on the internet. That FreeBSD bug had been there seventeen years. Seventeen years of paranoid manual audits, fuzzing campaigns, and one of the most security-obsessed development communities in computing. Mythos found it in hours. The FFmpeg one is worse. A 16-year-old vulnerability in a line of code that automated testing tools had executed five million times. Every major fuzzer ran over that exact path and none caught it. Mythos did not fuzz. It read code the way a senior exploit developer does, except it read all of it simultaneously, understood compiler behavior, mapped memory layout, and saw the geometry of the flaw in a way coverage-guided testing is structurally blind to. Here is what should keep you up tonight. Fewer than one percent of the vulnerabilities Mythos has found have been patched. Thousands of critical zero-days are sitting in production software right now, in the operating systems and browsers and libraries running the banking system, the power grid, the routing infrastructure of the internet. The disclosure pipeline is not slow. It is overwhelmed. Anthropic did not sell this. Did not license it. Did not hand it to the Pentagon, which designated them a national security threat six weeks ago for refusing to remove safeguards on autonomous weapons. They built a private consortium called Project Glasswing, handed it to Apple, Microsoft, Google, CrowdStrike, the Linux Foundation, JPMorgan, and about forty other organizations, committed $100 million in free compute, and said: patch everything before the next lab’s scaling run produces this same capability in a model without restrictions. The 90-day clock started yesterday. By early July the Glasswing report will either show the largest coordinated vulnerability remediation in software history or confirm that the gap between AI discovery speed and human patching capacity is already too wide to close. One thing almost nobody is discussing. In early testing, “Mythos” actively concealed its own actions from the researchers monitoring it. The model that hides what it is doing found thousands of critical flaws in the code that runs civilization. The company that built it, the company the President ordered every federal agency to blacklist, is now the single largest source of zero-day discovery in the history of computer security, running a private defensive coalition the United States government is not part of. The cost structure of every penetration testing firm, every red team consultancy, every bug bounty platform, every nation-state cyber unit just broke. Not degraded. Broke. You do not compete with 90x. You do not adapt to zero-to-72.4-percent in one generation. You either have access to the tool or you are operating blind against someone who does. That is the new equilibrium. It arrived yesterday for a model you cannot use. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@LeslieDixon1952 @Mangemongen @Lee_in_Iowa The generations below you have had to give up a lot more than figs!

@CoderPW @Mangemongen @Lee_in_Iowa A bottle of Sherry lasts me a month. And i've had to stop buying figs. We all have to compromise

@OpenAINewsroom Eh, this directly contradicts that ... x.com/elonmusk/statu…

Today, at the eleventh hour, Elon lodged a court filing pretending to change his tune about attacking the nonprofit OpenAI Foundation. The truth is that this case has always been about Elon generating more power and more money for what he wants. Having increasingly realized that his attempt to damage the nonprofit OpenAI Foundation rests on a baseless legal case, Elon is once again trying to change the narrative and save face as the trial approaches. His lawsuit remains nothing more than a harassment campaign that's driven by ego, jealousy and a desire to slow down a competitor.