
Punished Elder
5.6K posts

Punished Elder
@DigitalPastaFan
Member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Nerd of too many things.



How fucking retarded do you have to be to believe that the original intent of the 14th amendment’s authors was for citizenship to be automatically granted to the children of tourists, illegals, and even enemy combatants who are being held on American soil? The man who wrote the amendment quite literally went on the Senate floor and publicly declared that it wouldn’t apply to foreigners or aliens.






Ending birthright citizenship is essential for American sovereignty. The 14th Amendment was written to protect freed slaves after the Civil War not to reward illegal immigrants with anchor babies that enable chain migration. Most nations require at least one citizen parent. Automatic citizenship by soil location incentivizes lawbreaking, burdens taxpayers, and dilutes the meaning of citizenship. We must choose who joins our nation not let geography decide. Time to fix it. #EndBirthrightCitizenship











🚀 | AHORA - ARTEMIS II: Los tripulantes del Artemis II inician su camino hacia la nave.




How fucking retarded do you have to be to believe that the original intent of the 14th amendment’s authors was for citizenship to be automatically granted to the children of tourists, illegals, and even enemy combatants who are being held on American soil? The man who wrote the amendment quite literally went on the Senate floor and publicly declared that it wouldn’t apply to foreigners or aliens.



BREAKING: Justice Sam Alito explains that unlimited birthright citizenship means a Chinese, Iranian or Russian foreigner can have a child in America, and that US citizen owes military allegiance to a foreign adversary.

You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.


