Durabl

Looking for a technical co-founder. Not offering a salary. Offering ownership. The thesis is built. The investor document exists. The market proved the problem with $600M in losses in one month. If you've shipped on @pendle_fi or @Morpho and feel this problem personally,

It belongs in front of it. That's the architecture. @Morpho

An open-sourced Midnight with the Ratifier pattern. Validation logic separated from core execution. Modular. Flexible. Non-upgradable core. Morpho built this into the protocol. DurablFi builds it into the user experience. The intelligence layer doesn't belong inside the protocol.

The interface still shows you one APY. The transparency problem just got five times harder. That's why @DurablFi exists.

This is exactly the transparency gap @DurablFi is built to close. 🔸Decompose each Market's yield separately. 🔸Disclose the risk profile of each Hub clearly. 🔸Execute the right strategy atomically. 🔸Aave V4 made the problem bigger. We're building the solution.

Inside each Hub, Bluechip Market, Lido Market, EtherFi Market, Gold Market, Forex Market. Each one has different collateral rules, liquidation thresholds, and oracle dependencies. You need to know which one you're in before you deposit.

@aave V4 just launched 3 Hubs and 5 specialised Markets. Each with different risk profiles. The interface still shows one APY. Thread on why this changes everything for yield transparency

@Mantle_Official @DoraHacks Equity + prize split. DMs open. @Mantle_Official @DoraHacks

Officially in the Turing Test Hackathon 2026 on Mantle. $100K prize pool. We're building the yield decomposer, breaking down any DeFi APY into base rate, emissions, duration, and risk score in real time. Need one technical builder. Solidity or data indexing background.

DurablFi Discord is live!!!. This is where the real conversation happens. Yield decomposition. Risk intelligence. Building in public. Come in early. discord.gg/xr84cPaje

@techbysprout @pendle_fi @Morpho Appreciate the honest take. The GTM validation point lands, 10 paying intent signals is a different conversation than a waitlist. We're working on exactly that. What does your framework look like?

@DurablFi @pendle_fi @Morpho Before you look for a technical co-founder, validate the go-to-market. Most tech people won't join unless they see this proof. Get 10 people saying "I'd pay for this" and the conversation changes completely. Sprout does this in our Seed phase, happy to share the framework.

Looking for a technical co-founder. Not offering a salary. Offering ownership. The thesis is built. The investor document exists. The market proved the problem with $600M in losses in one month. If you've shipped on @pendle_fi or @Morpho and feel this problem personally,

my DMs are open.

April 2026 is statistically the most damaging month in DeFi history and it's not over yet. That list makes the problem undeniable.

@gauntlet_xyz It was access to risk intelligence most users will never have. That's the gap @DurablFi is building into.

@gauntlet_xyz This is what risk-aware DeFi looks like. rsETH didn't qualify for conservative vaults. Thin liquidity. Short track record. LP concentration. You saw it before the exploit. Regular users had no idea. The difference between zero losses and $290M in damage wasn't luck.

Only quant teams can access it today. @DurablFi makes it accessible to everyone.

Gauntlet's 50+ Morpho vaults. Zero bad debt. Zero user losses. How? rsETH never qualified for conservative vaults. Thin liquidity. LP concentration. Short track record. They assessed durability before the exploit. Not during. That institutional-grade risk intelligence exists.

"Transparency isn't optional. It's infrastructure"

Today the fortress was Aave. $26B TVL. Audited. Trusted. The gatekeeper was a bridge nobody questioned. The fortress still stands. The gatekeeper cost $290M. Always ask about the gatekeeper. That's what Durabl shows you.