Tweet ghim
The Mad Hatter
905 posts
The Mad Hatter
@ElizabethG544
Writer/author. FB Elizabeth Grundin “aka” The Mad Hatter
The equator Tham gia Nisan 2023
149 Đang theo dõi108 Người theo dõi
@CharlesMullins2 I get that, like riding a wave. But the object riding the wave depending on size and density depends on when you hit the shore. 🤔
English
I actually think that’s really close.
It could be doing both but not in the same way.
creating = the underlying time flow itself
counting = what we observe when systems evolve within it
So clocks don’t measure time directly…
they measure how processes respond to that flow
Which is why:
• different clocks tick at different rates
• motion and gravity change “time”
• and there’s no single universal pace
So yeah time might both “create” and “count”…
but the counting part is just how we experience the deeper process.
Almost like:
time is the current…
and everything else is just riding it.
English
Interesting seeing similar ideas emerging.
Some models say the universe evolves by minimizing tension.
I agree with that direction.
But here’s the difference:
They treat time as a byproduct of change.
I treat time as the cause of change.
Not:
Tension → change → time
But:
Time → tension → structure → reality
That shift changes everything.
So the real question is:
Is time just counting events…
or is it the thing creating them?
Follow me for more deep insights
English
@CharlesMullins2 Like an undercurrent or undertow? 🤔 At that point what causes that?
English
That’s fair but I think that’s the key point:
there is another driving factor…
we’ve just been calling its effects “forces” or “torque”.
What if torque feels fundamental…
because it’s the first layer we can observe?
But underneath that:
something is creating the imbalance that torque responds to
In my view, that “driver” isn’t another force…
it’s how time flows differently across a system
So torque can still be real and essential…
just not the root cause.
Kind of like:
pressure feels fundamental in fluids…
but it comes from deeper motion underneath.
So the question becomes:
Is torque the driver…
or the system responding to something even more fundamental?
English
Two teams measured the expansion of the universe.
Both are precise.
Both are trusted.
And both are wrong.
This is the Hubble tension:
• Early universe (CMB) → slower expansion
• Local universe (supernova) → faster expansion
Same universe.
Different answers.
So what’s broken?
Maybe not the measurements…
maybe time itself.
In my framework:
Time isn’t constant.
It’s a field.
And that field compresses differently depending on structure.
So when we measure expansion:
We’re not just measuring distance…
we’re measuring distance through different rates of time.
Early universe = more uniform → smoother time flow
Local universe = structured → uneven time compression
Two measurements.
Two time rates.
Two different answers.
No dark energy required.
No broken physics.
Just time behaving differently depending on where you measure it.
What if the universe isn’t expanding wrong…
we’re just reading time wrong?
Follow me for more deep insights
English
@CharlesMullins2 I’d say it’s fundamental, if it wasn’t then there’d have to be another driving force factor.
English
That’s a clean way to put it.
But I’d take it one step deeper:
torque might be the mechanism we observe
not the original cause
In this view:
the real “cause” could be uneven time flow creating asymmetry in how motion distributes
and torque is just how that imbalance shows up in a system.
So instead of:
cause → torque → effect
it could be:
time imbalance → torque → effect
Which raises the bigger question:
Is torque fundamental…
or just how a time gradient expresses itself?
English
That’s a really sharp way to put it.
Torque is a great analogy it’s not just about force, it’s about how that force is applied through a system.
In this view, what we call “forces” might actually be:
responses to uneven time flow gradients in how fast different regions can evolve
So instead of force pushing something…
it could be:
time pulling systems back into balance
Your wall example fits too:
It’s not just impact it’s how long the system can sustain the interaction.
And that comes down to the local time conditions.
So yeah… maybe we shouldn’t be calling them forces at all.
Maybe they’re just effects of uneven time.
That shift in language might actually be the key to understanding what’s really going on.
English
@CharlesMullins2 Well, that makes me think of Torque, it’s not how fast you hit the wall, it’s how far your car pushes through the wall. Should we be calling them “Forces” or effects from uneven time? 🌺
English
Yeah exactly
that’s a great way to think about it.
If time stopped or changed suddenly in one region, it wouldn’t just affect that spot…
it would ripple outward.
Almost like a domino effect, but through the time field itself:
some regions keep evolving
others slow or “freeze”
boundaries form where things don’t match
That mismatch could create all sorts of effects:
• energy build-up
• distortion in motion
• even what we’d interpret as forces
So reality might not break…
it would just reconfigure based on the new time flow.
Makes you wonder:
What we call “forces”…
are they just reactions to uneven time?
English
@CharlesMullins2 Hmmm… it might would have a domino effect if it stopped suddenly? 🤔 Then you are looking at new issue, depending on where stuff fell or stopped moving. 🌺
English
Exactly
that’s a really good way to picture it.
Like a car moving through air or a wave moving through water, the medium changes how things behave.
In this case, the “medium” isn’t space…
it’s time itself.
So when time flows differently in a region:
motion changes
energy behaves differently
even how fast things can happen shifts
What we call gravity might just be that effect
objects moving through regions of different time flow.
So yeah, your analogy is spot on.
The real question is:
What happens when that “flow” stops completely?
English
Post a picture YOU took. Just a pic. No description
English
@HombreEpilogado This is interesting. Sadness for all doesn’t look then same, and for some it’s the most intense intimate moments that bring about the release of that sadness. 🌺
English
Hicimos el amor en medio de la tristeza
🖊️Charles Bukowski
📷web
Español
The Mad Hatter đã retweet
This is a little off subject of the post, everyone asks what is consciousness or what is our purpose. My question is what is our purpose without it? Answer absolutely nothing besides basic survival instincts.
Dr Rudolf Steiner@RudolfStein2026
Breath → Soul → Thought → Anthroposophy Human consciousness has not always worked the way it does today. In the ancient East, knowledge began with breath. People felt the soul in the rhythm of respiration. Through disciplined breathing (Yoga), they trained perception itself. Later, in the Greek and medieval worlds, the path shifted. Knowledge was cultivated through inner exercises of the soul — grammar, rhetoric, logic, geometry, astronomy. Thought was still experienced as something alive in the world. Then came modern age. Humanity learned to know the world primarily through abstract thinking. Thought detached itself from perception. Science became powerful; yet increasingly disconnected from the living qualities of reality. Anthroposophy does not reject science. It asks the next question. What happens if the same disciplined clarity we use in mathematics is applied inwardly? Steiner’s answer: Human evolution moves from breath, to soul-exercise, to abstract thought- and now toward conscious spiritual perception. Anthroposophy is meant to be the next step. The real question is: Will thinking remain abstract… or will it become alive again?
English
The Mad Hatter đã retweet
Heron’s fountain runs with no motor, just clever physics.
English