Eric Withrow

日本人は古き良きアメリカが大好きなんだけど目覚めたアメリカでは古き良きアメリカが蔑まれている。日本人が憧れに満ちたピュアな瞳で自分達を見つめていることに気がついたアメリカの兄貴達がギアをトップに叩きこんだ。 この認識で間違ってないかな？ 兄貴達、あんた達は間違いなく僕らの憧れだ。

@ie_andre Trade it in for a skyline

さっきはじめてアメリカの方からコメントいただいた。めちゃ嬉しい。 ということで私の車は、日産 B11セントラ ワゴン（日本名 サニー カリフォルニア）です。どなたかの心に刺さるかな

@tanomuzeA People respect each other and are courteous and kind in Japan

🇺🇸あなたは何故日本が好きですか？ ずっとXでアメリカ人に聞きたかった。

@seedyoulater Picked this up in Japan over Christmas, brought it back home. Easier to find it there than in NY

アメリカの人に届くかわかんないけど、せっかくだし言うだけ言っておくか！ 美味しいバーボンを作ってくれてありがとう！！ 特に、ブラントンは本当に最高だよ、特別な日の晩にゆっくり飲むことにしているんだ。

家の近くに　本格テキサスBBQが食える店が必要だ　 このサイズの肉じゃ満足出来ない！！！ 肉を！！もっとデカい肉を！！！！

俺だって肉の写真くらい何枚か持ってるんだ、アメリカのBBQに負けないぞ！対戦お願いします！

@ruiyukimura 35 day dry aged ribeyes

(」゜□゜)」アメリカ人よー！聞いて驚け見て叫べ！私の家の近くのスーパーマーケットは小さいので、肉売り場はたったこれだけだー！ここに並んでるのが、牛豚鶏すべてだー！

@ankoromochuu Moving meat

アメリカ人、めっちゃ飯テロしてくるやん 美味そうな肉ばっか見せてくるやん 🍖🇺🇸

Xで言語の壁が取り除かれて自動翻訳されるようになりましたが、これは本当に凄い事ですね！皆さん、僕は日本に住んでいる17歳の冒険家ゆたぼんです！僕は日本人である事を誇りに思っています！僕は日本が大好きです！

@8nuvola Yum

肉の画像をあげるとアメリカの兄貴達まで届くって本当ですか ついでに日本でシバかれてるマスタングも見てくれ

日本人は朝食を食べて支度して、そろそろ学校や会社に向かう時間です。 世界のみんなは今、何してるの？

アメリカのみんなのおかげでわかったよ！ アメリカにも共産党は小さいけどあるんだね。 それと大きな組織として民主党が共産的だということも… 私はアメリカだったら、やっぱり共和党を支持するよ！ 私はトランプ大統領が好きです😊

@hiranoi_nomade Leroy and Lewis in Austin, TX today. Flatiron steak, beef cheeks and brisket!

今日も僕のTLはBBQや肉で溢れる平和な世界になっています。そのおかげでたくさんのアメリカの方々からフォローしていただくという現象が起こりました。今日もお肉投稿していきます。おはようございます。

@norimura440 I’ll send you a Harley and you send me a Skyline?

米国ニキのフォロワーが増えて困惑している。 日本が好きなアメリカンを見ると嬉しいように、彼らもそうなのか？知らんけど。 I love America and American motor cultures. This picture is my car,1969 Plymouth Barracuda.I also owned a H-D 1973 XLCH,two years ago.

@didi_daisukedoi Beautiful

めちゃくちゃ嬉しいコメントをたくさん頂いてとても励みになってる。一つ一つ丁寧にお返ししたいけど…もう返し切れない…みなさんThankyou！としか言えない😉 Greetings from Japan🇯🇵

@kunukunu New Haven kills NY and Chicago If you don’t know, you don’t know…

I wrote a tweet praising American pizza last night. This may have triggered something. Now bunch of people are argu... well, sharing their thoughts about which region in the states has the best pizza.

@terrakei07 Send Grand Sumo to the US again!

アメリカ人の皆さん、私が日本でいま最も「反ポリコレ」「反WOKE」の著述家です。よろしくお願いいたします。

@Maelzel_opening I love sumo

フォードのクソデカピックアップトラックで現れたクソデカテキサス兄貴がクソデカグリルで焼くクソデカ肉が食いたいの。

Claude knows! —> The Lump of Labor Fallacy and Why AGI Unemployment Panic Is Economically Illiterate Let me lay this out with full rigor, because this argument deserves to be prosecuted completely rather than waved away with a sound bite. I. What the Lump of Labor Fallacy Actually Is The lump of labor fallacy is the assumption that there exists a fixed, finite quantity of work in an economy — a lump — such that if a machine (or an immigrant, or a woman entering the workforce) does some of it, there is necessarily less left for human workers to do. It treats employment as a zero-sum pie. The fallacy was named and formalized in the early 20th century but the error it describes is far older. It animated the Luddite riots of 1811–1816, where English textile workers destroyed power looms convinced that the machines would steal their jobs permanently. It drove opposition to the spinning jenny, the cotton gin, the mechanical reaper, the steam engine, the telegraph, the railroad, the automobile assembly line, the personal computer, and every other major labor-displacing technology in the history of industrial civilization. Every single time, the catastrophists were wrong. Not partially wrong. Structurally, fundamentally, categorically wrong — because they misunderstood the nature of economic production itself. The reason the fixed-pie assumption fails is this: demand is not fixed. Work generates income. Income generates demand for goods and services. Demand for goods and services generates new categories of work. This is an engine, not a reservoir. When you drain some of the reservoir with a machine, the engine speeds up and refills it — and often refills it past its previous level. II. The Classical Economic Mechanism That Destroys the Fallacy To understand why the lump-of-labor assumption is wrong about AGI, you need to understand the precise mechanism by which technological unemployment resolves itself. There are four distinct channels, all operating simultaneously: Channel 1: The Productivity-Demand Feedback Loop (Say’s Law, Modified) When a technology increases the productivity of labor or replaces labor entirely in a given task, it lowers the cost of producing whatever that task was part of. Lower production costs mean either: ∙Lower prices for consumers (real purchasing power rises), or ∙Higher profits for producers (which get reinvested, distributed as dividends, or spent as wages for other workers), or ∙Both. Either way, aggregate real income in the economy rises. That additional real income does not evaporate. It gets spent on something — including goods and services that didn’t previously exist or were previously too expensive to consume at scale. That spending creates demand. That demand creates jobs. This is not a theoretical conjecture. The average American in 1900 spent roughly 43% of their income on food. Today it’s around 10%. Agricultural mechanization didn’t produce a nation of starving unemployed farm laborers — it freed up 33% of household income to be spent on automobiles, television sets, air conditioning, healthcare, education, travel, smartphones, and streaming services, most of which didn’t exist as industries in 1900. The workers who left farms went to factories, then to offices, then to service industries, then to information industries. The economy didn’t run out of work. It metamorphosed.

We all know what some feel uncomfortable saying: Most taxes are WASTED. They are leaked and grifted into all kinds of programs that sound good on the surface. But that’s the lie that is told so politicians can take more of your earnings and dole it out to win votes and stay in power. But it also turns out that people aren’t stupid and know the game. So the states that admit this by breaking away from the hamster wheel of increased taxation are winning. While those who continue to try and sell the lie are losing. At the limit, those losing states are leaking so much revenue that they will eventually lose so much tax revenue as to be effectively insolvent. Remember this data is just from 2023…we are in mid 2026 so another two years of this trend is already in the books.