xGOAT 🐐

Bro

soon 18 months actually😅 @beniaminmincu @lucianmincu @serb_daniel please resign, you are not fit for the role

@cz_binance I wonder if stealing $50B from users will be included in the next 2nd edition?

Got this picture from a friend. Thanks guys! 🙏

that's how we roll 🤣

Q1 is over, now is Q2, wen? @beniaminmincu @lucianmincu

suitable name

@solver_cs they still have 36 hours🤞

Remember? Very close and still nothing.

@lucianmincu Don't blame the community for not standing with you anymore or for expressing doubts. Many supported you for the longest time, but you decided to lie, manipulate, ignore and block the community. Be the change you want to see, until then... 🤷

A Bet We Made in 2018 This is me and Vitalik in 2018. ETH Devcon. We were at a table talking about sharding and how blockchains could actually scale by running execution in parallel. At the time, Ethereum and Elrond had the same thesis. Both believed execution sharding was the path forward. Since then, Ethereum changed direction multiple times. Sharding gave way to rollups. Rollups gave way to "we need to scale L1 again." The roadmap shifted, the promises changed, the technical approach pivoted more than once. And through all of it - the Ethereum community stayed. They gave the team the space to find the right path. They didn't kill the project when the roadmap changed. They believed the builders would figure it out. That patience is what kept Ethereum alive. Not the technology. The community. ─── We made a different bet. We bet on execution sharding from day one and we never left that path. Adaptive state sharding shipped on mainnet in 2020. Three execution shards plus a metachain. State, network, transactions - all sharded from genesis. Supernova shipped this year. Consensus decoupled from execution. 600ms blocks. achieved 88ms finality. 120,000 TPS burst mode on the same validator hardware. 3,200+ validators on consumer-grade machines. 171,000 commits. #6 in the entire industry. Ahead of Solana, Avalanche, Sui, Polygon, Aptos, and TON. Tier-one infrastructure providers on board, distribution partners like Cointelegraph are running validator nodes. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol is settling on MultiversX. EGLD is named in an Arizona state strategic reserve bill. The agentic commerce stack - x402, MPP, MX-8004, UCP, ACP, MCP - is live on one chain. xMoney is building regulated stablecoin issuance under MiCA. The infrastructure underneath has never been stronger. ─── And yet the market prices EGLD like none of this exists. Every blockchain community is going through the same thing right now. EGLD is down. ETH is down. SOL is down. The market doesn't differentiate between chains that shipped paradigm-shifting infrastructure and chains that shipped a landing page. But here's what's different about right now. Bitcoin survived 2014. Ethereum survived 2018. Solana survived 2022. In each case, the community stayed long enough for the technology to matter. In each case, the community that held wrote the next chapter. And in each case, the ones who fractured, who turned on their own builders, who let the loudest voices - the ones who already sold - define the narrative? Those communities don't exist anymore. You don't remember their names. The perception of value has been distorted. By cycles. By speculation. By narratives that reward noise over engineering. And by us - divided when we should be united. Turning on each other instead of building forward together. Look at what's underneath. Not the chart. The infrastructure. 88ms finality. 120K TPS. #6 in developer activity globally. Tier-one infrastructure partners. Stripe settling on-chain. EGLD in US state legislation. Regulated stablecoins under MiCA. An agentic commerce stack that Visa, Coinbase, and Mastercard are racing to replicate. This is not a project searching for relevance. This is a project that shipped the relevance and is waiting for its community to match it. If this fails, it won't be because the technology wasn't good enough. It will be because we weren't united enough to carry it forward. I've been here since 2018. That table with Vitalik. Every pivot, every cycle, every doubt. Still here. Still building. Now it's your turn. Not to believe. To show up.

Just a little bit lower and that could be close to 2% of the egld supply.

sure, but first self-driving and Mars that he promised years ago 😅

well done @beniaminmincu and @lucianmincu on this marketing iniciative

@lucianmincu And yet you can't convince investors to invest even $1M 🤷

Who's Actually Building? 171,000 commits. #6 in the entire blockchain industry. Ahead of Bitcoin. Ahead of Solana. Ahead of Avalanche, NEAR, Sui, Polygon, Aptos, and TON. Almost 2x Solana. Nearly 3.5x Aptos. The data is public. I'm not writing this to flex. I'm writing it because the people doing the real work deserve to see it reflected somewhere other than a Git log. ─── Building through a market like this is brutal. The price bleeds. Liquidity gets extracted by professionals who've never deployed a contract. Narratives rotate every two weeks. The projects that survive aren't the loudest, they're the ones that refuse to stop shipping. We shipped Supernova while the market did everything it could to make us irrelevant. 150,000 lines of new protocol code. 20 months. A complete rearchitecture of how consensus and execution interact. 88ms block finality on 600ms slots. The block finalizes before the round ends. 120,000 TPS burst mode on the same validator hardware. 3,200+ nodes. Full sharding intact. We didn't build this because the market asked for it. We built it because it was the right thing to build. ─── The market rewards narratives. It rewards projects that rename themselves to match whatever's trending. It doesn't reward the team that designed inclusion proofs so blocks finalize before execution completes. It doesn't reward 171,000 commits. It barely notices. But here's the thing, infrastructure doesn't need the market's permission to work. Over 500 million transactions processed. 3,200+ validator nodes across four continents. And now, sub-second finality on every transaction type. ─── People ask: "What's left for blockchain when AI takes over everything?" Wrong question. AI agents need to transact autonomously. They need identity. They need programmable money that settles in milliseconds. They need micropayments at scale without a human clicking "approve." Credit cards can't do this. Bank wires can't do this. These rails were built for humans, not machines. This is where the entire stack is converging. Look at what happened in the last 90 days: Visa launched agentic payment tools. Mastercard acquired BVNK for $1.8B. Coinbase is pushing x402 hard. Circle is racing for stablecoin dominance. Stripe built ACP with OpenAI. They're all building pieces of the same stack: identity, payments, settlement, stablecoins. We built the whole thing. On one chain. x402 for autonomous agent payments. MX-8004 for on-chain agent identity. UCP, ACP, AP2, MCP for agent communication and commerce. xMoney for regulated stablecoin issuance and fiat-to-crypto connectivity under MiCA. Relayed v3 for gasless transactions so agents don't need to hold tokens to start. Six protocols. Regulated stablecoins. Fiat rails. One network. The stack that Visa, Stripe, and Coinbase are assembling from separate pieces, we shipped as a unified layer. ─── And the community. Every validator who kept running through the drawdown. Every builder who deployed when nobody was watching. Every staker who stayed. 171,000 commits. Supernova. Battle of Nodes. Cointelegraph joining as a validator. EGLD named in an Arizona state strategic reserve bill. The signals are there. The infrastructure is live. The convergence between AI, payments, and blockchain isn't five years away. It's happening now. The teams that built through the hard part don't need to pivot when the opportunity arrives. They're already there. We're already there.

Lol

just perfect for the end of the week so much winning

@royalmonkie @ElrondSlayer @SasuRobert If they really had any connections it would be easy for them to get investors without diluting supply and increase inflation.

@ElrondSlayer I submitted a revised solution to the 9.5% inflation to @sasurobert at 6.5%, with a full remit, he wasn't interested. Also they have an unlimited supply now, whereas before it was capped. Supanova is a game changer for them. Egld will pump again, they have connections.✌️

🚨 EGLD Holders: Who's Actually Dragging the #MultiversX Ecosystem Down? My Realistic Opinion + Concrete Solutions! 🔥 Hi, $EGLD army! After months of discussions, FUDs, and analyses, let's talk without rose-tinted glasses and without conspiracy accusations. The harsh reality (based on public data from March 2026): - There is no evidence that anyone from the team (Beniamin, Lucian or anyone else) is “sabotaging” the project intentionally. - Supernova is live on Battle Net, Battle of Nodes broke records (500M+ transactions), and the network is faster than ever. The team has worked non-stop for 20 months. But what is actually dragging the PRICE and SENTIMENT down? 1. The tail inflation proposal (9.47% annually) – the biggest PR mistake of the last year. Many old holders felt that the promise of scarcity was broken. 2. Slow adoption before Supernova – developers and capital fled to #Solana/#Base because synchronous execution limited big dApps. 3. Too technical communication – the team explains brilliantly at the engineering level, but too little “meme”, hype or clarity for the average community. 4. Minuscule market cap (\~$120M) + weak liquidity – any large sale moves the price brutally. The concrete solutions that the team SHOULD implement URGENTLY: 1. Simple communication + aggressive meme marketing – an official memes account, short video updates, weekly AMAs in Romanian + English. 2. More aggressive burn + inflation review – to show the community that they listen and adjust (e.g.: bigger burn from fees or inflation cap). 3. Big partnerships post-mainnet – focus on real-time gaming, high-frequency DeFi and 2-3 major projects that bring real TVL (not just hype). 4. Buy-back campaigns and listings – use part of the treasury to support liquidity and price. 5. Community events – airdrops, Battle of Nodes challenges with $EGLD prizes, physical meet-ups in Romania. My sincere verdict: The team is not the enemy – it's one of the most competent in crypto. The problem is that they were too much engineers and too little “showmen”. #Supernova is the reset. If they implement at least 3 out of the 5 solutions above, the comeback to $50–$100 becomes real in 2026-2027. Now tell ME in the comments: 1. What do you think is the biggest mistake of the team so far? 2. What solution would you like to see implemented FIRST? 3. Staking at $4 now or waiting for the official mainnet? Leave your honest opinion 👇 Like if you're still bullish on $EGLD long term! RT so it reaches the entire #MultiversX community! #EGLD #MultiversX #Supernova #EGLDCommunity #CryptoRomania #EGLDto100

It took Nancy decades to earn what they do on a good day x.com/MultiversX_GOA…

@MultiversX came for the ✅ trolling, left disappointed

✅ Secure Proof of Stake ✅ Meritocratic validator selection ✅ ~3,200 active validators ✅ Zero equivocation ✅ Formally verified VM ✅ Fully sharded, horizontally scalable ✅ Parallel cross-shard execution ✅ ~$0.0002 per transfer ✅ Unconsumed gas refunded ✅ Gas abstraction ✅ Onchain 2FA ✅ Protocol-native tokens ✅ Fungible tokens ✅ Non-fungible tokens ✅ Semi-fungible tokens ✅ Multi-token transfer ✅ WASM smart contracts ✅ Custom-built Virtual Machine ✅ Native VM elliptic curve operations ✅ Multi-VM customizable chains (Lightspeed SDK) ✅ Reproducible smart contract builds ✅ Upgradeable contracts ✅ Chain Simulator ✅ Millisecond-precision smart contract timestamps ✅ Mature onchain governance ✅ KPI-gated emissions ✅ Developer royalties ✅ MCP integration ✅ Agentic Commerce Stack (x402, UCP, ACP, AP2) ✅ MX-8004 agent identity standard ✅ Agent Builder Hub ✅ Carbon negative ⏳ Sub-second finality (Supernova) ⏳ Protocol-native Zero Knowledge proof Built different.

of course, the weekend again 😂

@lucianmincu bro, focus on 0.5B treasury

Supernova is live on Battle Net. Here's what changed under the hood and why it matters. The paradigm shift nobody's talking about: Every blockchain in the industry is measured on two metrics: block time and throughput. Faster blocks = better chain. More TPS = better chain. ---------- Supernova breaks this framing entirely. For the first time in the blockchain industry, block finality is faster than block slot allocation. Let me explain what that means. How every other blockchain works: Traditional blockchains follow Execute → Propose → Vote. Validators must execute every transaction before proposing a block. The block slot is the clock. Finality can never be faster than the slot, because execution is in the critical path. Ethereum: 12.8s slot, ~12.8 minutes finality. Solana: 400-600ms slot, 13 seconds finality. Sui: variable, ~500 to 1000 ms for complex transactions. In every case: finality ≥ block slot. This is treated as a law of physics. It's not. ---------- How Supernova works: We flipped the model to Propose/Vote → then Execute. Consensus proceeds independently of execution. Validators agree on transaction ordering first. Execution results are notarized in subsequent block headers via inclusion proofs. The inclusion proof is the key innovation: it allows a block to be finalized with cryptographic proof that its transactions will execute correctly, before the execution itself completes. The virtual state tracker in the transaction pool maintains a deterministic view of account states (nonces, balances, pending transactions) so consensus can validate without waiting for full execution. Result: the block is finalized faster than the block round itself. 88ms finality measured in testing. Sub-200ms under real-world conditions. On 600ms block slots. Finality < block slot. First time in the industry. ---------- The throughput story: With the same hardware specification as pre-Supernova mainnet, the network now achieves ~120,000 transactions per second in burst mode. Same nodes. Same machines. 10x the block production cadence. This is the same validator infrastructure running fundamentally better software. The backpressure system (Execution-Result Inclusion Estimator) ensures this scales safely - dynamically adjusting per-block gas limits if execution lags behind proposals, so minimum-spec nodes never get overwhelmed. What this means in context: - Block time: 6s → 600ms (10x) - Finality: ~88ms measured (first blockchain where finality < slot time) - Throughput: ~120,000 TPS burst mode (same hardware) - Architecture: consensus fully decoupled from execution - Sharding: 3 execution shards + metachain, fully preserved - Validators: 3,200+ nodes, no hardware upgrade required ---------- Battle of Nodes is stress-testing all of this right now. $150K in prizes to find what breaks. Validators, security researchers, builders, and guilds pushing the limits. If Supernova survives this, it ships to mainnet. 150,000 lines of new protocol code. 20 months of engineering. The most significant upgrade since genesis.

fuck you piggs