Scooch

8.5K posts

Scooch banner
Scooch

Scooch

@NeoScooch

How does the Political Left handle facts they don't like? Deny, Deflect, and Delusion. 🇨🇦

Ontario, Canada Tham gia Mayıs 2009
95 Đang theo dõi104 Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
Poilievre's messages reflect hope and stability returning to Canada. Carney's messages reflect sacrifice and crisis continuing in Canada. The choice of who would be better to lead Canadians and Canada into the future has never been clearer.
English
1
0
2
1.4K
John John
John John@JohnJohn894747·
@NeoScooch @gator_gum @grok Amazing, time for you and your pack of retards to pitch 60B and get this pipeline built because its not going to do much for any other province and i see no reason for my taxes to pay for a gay pipeline
English
1
0
0
7
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
Hot take: Let's build the pipeline and the high-speed rail. Everyone is happy. Conservatives have told us how hugely profitable the pipeline will be, so, the rail is easily funded. Let's build them both. Let's start right now.
English
91
25
165
3.7K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@CanadianCoffey They clung to power by clinging to each other. Then they turned the whole country against them. Singh hit the road as soon as his pension vested. Trudeau's ego wouldn't have allowed him to run in the next election and lose as badly as he would've. Cowardice, not honourable.
English
0
0
0
17
Coffey4Canada 🇨🇦
Coffey4Canada 🇨🇦@CanadianCoffey·
They didn’t cling to the halls of power of a nation after blowing a 30 point in the general election lead and losing their own riding. They both resigned when they knew they were no longer helping their party. Honourable.
Scooch@NeoScooch

@CanadianCoffey He's still here, Trudeau and Singh are gone.

English
5
18
81
1.2K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@Trut_21 @gator_gum No one has money to just jump on a train and go shopping. If Canada was thriving, this would be a different conversation. Either way, you're not accounting for the $31B in revenue from the pipeline with "tourism".
English
0
0
0
6
trut Whut
trut Whut@Trut_21·
@NeoScooch @gator_gum The HSR would pay itself off in 3-5 years by the GDP increase from the increased amount of economic activity in the population corridor.
English
1
0
0
12
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@BestStephenD @gator_gum When times are good, you gamble. When times are tough, you go with the sure bet. This is true for individuals, businesses, and governments. It's just good fiscal policy.
English
1
0
0
8
Stephen Best
Stephen Best@BestStephenD·
@NeoScooch @gator_gum It's really very poor thinking to look at public infrastructure or any government spending as financial investments that must be justified by a return. Indeed, no cogent case can be made to assess government spending by a finance industry metric.
English
2
0
2
17
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@JohnJohn894747 @gator_gum Okay, dipshit. So if a pipeline costs $35B to $50B to build and then generates $31B in revenue per year, that is $62B in 2 years. Even at the high estimate, the pipeline already generates enough revenue in 2 years to pay for itself and have $12B left over.
Scooch tweet media
English
1
0
0
11
John John
John John@JohnJohn894747·
@NeoScooch @gator_gum You are so fucking retarded its not even funny. Genuinely bottom of the barrel type dumbfuck. At least educate yourself before talking about something you dont know anything about 🤣. How is the pipeline going go pay for itself in 2 years dipshit? Show your answer with math
English
2
0
0
17
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@Jenniferl554563 Liberals will slander a Conservative for appearing on a podcast by saying they paid to be on it. But when Trudeau was charging charities "speaking fees", they ate that shit up and kept voting for him. I bet if a Liberal is left alone long enough, they fight with themselves.
English
0
0
3
25
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@CanadianCoffey So you're pointing out the problem that he pointed out AND disagee with him at the same time? Have you stopped taking your meds? How the fuck can you agree and disagree with someone at the same damn time. What a loser.
English
0
0
0
18
Coffey4Canada 🇨🇦
Coffey4Canada 🇨🇦@CanadianCoffey·
Pierre was the guy who claimed that politics should not be a lifelong career. The guy that said MP’s should be limited to two terms. “Elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation.” - Pierre Poilievre He’s now on his 8th term.
Coffey4Canada 🇨🇦 tweet media
Polish Man 🏒@polish_man23

So if you get fired from one place are you no longer allowed to work elsewhere? Why are liberals so dumb? Note people. If you lose your job, you’re not allowed to find another one. Maybe Pierre should go on unemployment. For a guy who sucks so bad, the liberals sure are scared of

English
6
40
90
5.7K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@grok @greg_scott84 So we are ranked 61 on an index that tracks 64 countries + EU, and we've approximately always been around that position?
English
0
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, Canada is not at the bottom of the Climate Change Performance Index. In the latest 2026 edition, Canada ranks 61st (score 28.30) out of ~64 evaluated countries + EU—among the "very low performers," but not last. Saudi Arabia is 67th, followed by Iran (66th) and the US (65th). The list has covered 60+ countries/EU since its start. Canada has never been absolute last; its rank has varied (e.g., 62nd in 2025, 58th in 2023, 54th in 2019).
English
1
0
0
35
Greg
Greg@greg_scott84·
I don't think Conservative Party supporters understand what the Paris Agreement is. It is the foundational agreement that forms the basis for everything our governments do in the name of "climate change" and the pursuit of Net Zero 2050. Under this agreement, governments pledge to take actions in order to achieve certain goal and targets. Since Poilievre is dedicated to the Paris Agreement (as per his voting record), yet opposes carbon taxes, my question is: what is the Conservative Party's plan to meet the UN's Paris Agreement targets? It's a simple question.
English
276
29
107
10.5K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum I bet someone spent a lot of money proving something I could have proved with: 1 bowl 1 orange 1 grapefruit 1 lemon 1 lime 1 banana 1 idiot
English
0
0
0
4
Jarrett
Jarrett@Jarrettmmr·
@NeoScooch @gator_gum The funny part about it this is that you put lies after the “Conservatives like me” bit
English
1
0
0
13
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
Guys like Mario: "Look how cool this mega project is! Canada is falling behind!" Also, guys like Mario: "Don't build high speed rail! Who needs stuff like that?"
Gator⚡Gum tweet media
English
33
28
194
4.9K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum I see no one in that screenshot calling you a pedophile. They called you Ryan. You can read, right? Like you're not dumb or something?
English
0
0
0
9
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
Gator: "Look at who came rushing to the defense of the FP. Look at the coordinated messaging. This is a huge tell about the moths his light draws" Kel: "So you want to silence your opponents? You're a a pedophile." At this point all you can do is laugh at these people.
Gator⚡Gum tweet media
English
4
1
10
533
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum @MarcNixon24 @juleplas You mean like Disney and Jimmy Kimmel? When it's you... "How dare Trump ban freedom of speech?" When it's not you... "You aren't promised a platform to say whatever you want!" ABSOLUTE fucking hypocrite.
English
0
0
1
14
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
They're an independent entity that don't have to platform people they think are posting false information, inflammatory content, or anything like that. He can say what he wants, he's not entitled to their platform. He was likely brought on to discuss food and related matters. Not to bitch about the media.
English
4
1
26
426
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum Gator, just out here acting like she doesn't know the difference between the Consumer Carbon Tax and the Industrial Carbon Tax. Maybe she doesn't know. Who am I to say?
English
0
0
8
42
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum Three reasons why we build the pipeline over the train? 1. The pipeline will cost 50% less to build. 2. The pipeline with provide 7000% more revenue. 3. The pipeline benefits all of Canada and not only two provinces.
English
0
0
3
35
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
We shouldnt build the train because we aren't going to build it and it's nothing but talk. We shouldn't build the train because we don't build anything. That's some amazing logic on display here.
Gator⚡Gum tweet media
English
18
8
60
1.1K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
To put this in the simplest terms possible, picking the train over the pipeline is like... ...going to the store and buying 1 item for $1 when you could have bought 70 of the same item for $0.50. ...buying a car that takes you 200 years to pay off instead of the same car that would take 2 years to pay off. This is why Conservatives are branded the fiscally responsible ones. When Conservatives spend money, we make money. When Liberals spend money, we lose money.
English
1
0
3
73
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
I love the accounts saying we should have built the high speed rail a decade ago. It would have cost way less. We shouldn't build it now, because it used to be cheaper. Weird, a decade ago, they wouldn't have supported it then. 10 years from now, they will say the same thing of projects they're blocking today.
English
36
7
109
1.7K
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum Canada can build a pipeline for HALF of what the train would cost and the pipeline would provide a 7000% increase in revenue for ALL of Canada over the train from Toronto to Ottawa. 50% less for 7000% more? Easy choice. Who would pay $1 for 1 when you can pay $0.50 for 70? 🤪
English
1
0
1
30
Scooch
Scooch@NeoScooch·
@gator_gum Many political experts on the left have already said that this move was obviously not done by Poilievre for himself, or he would have done it during the election, and that it's obvious he did this to attempt to resolve trade tensions between Canada and the United States.
English
1
0
1
62
Gator⚡Gum
Gator⚡Gum@gator_gum·
So, Poilievre went on Rogan. It was the biggest moment in Canadian history. Is he back polling in a super majority? Is he preparing to attempt a confidence vote and take over the government? Or nah?
English
18
14
91
2.1K