Sickma

497 posts

Sickma

Sickma

@Sickmaaa

Tham gia Şubat 2024
1 Đang theo dõi25 Người theo dõi
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@HawkEmDownChris I assume F means the DC cinematic universe aka Snyderverse. In which case F easily
English
0
0
0
29
HAWK
HAWK@HawkEmDownChris·
Which universe are you getting rid of? A) Game of Thrones B) Star Wars C) Marvel Cinematic Universe D) The Lord of the Rings E) Harry Potter F) DC
HAWK tweet media
English
475
27
188
26.2K
Guillotine
Guillotine@mybenxtime·
@1914ad Will you leave bitcoin when this soft fork fails? It would be weird for you all to hang around after saying you are saving btc from CP and then just keep hodling. You know bc then you would have CP on your node and fbi at your door.
English
1
0
0
59
Justin Bechler #BIP-110
Tone Vays, who’s been lecturing us non-stop about how spam on Bitcoin is a complete non-issue, has never… heard of… the one guy responsible for… spam on Bitcoin. 🤦🏻‍♂️
Justin Bechler #BIP-110 tweet media
English
18
19
229
13.1K
Coinjoined Chris ⚡
Coinjoined Chris ⚡@coinjoined·
@HodlDee @mattkratter @DCupAndHandle Epstein was a limited partner in a fund that wanted to invest in blockstream but ultimately was kicked out of the round. The irony is that kratter worked for peter thiel and never once googled him apparently 🤡
English
5
0
7
344
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110@mattkratter·
Is the Bitcoin community just going to memory-hole the Andy Back allegations? If so, let's also stop pretending that we're any better than the fiat pedophiles.
English
55
78
466
17.1K
hodlonaut #BIP-110
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut·
I researched this today. It makes me more angry at Core. What the fuck.
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut

The main justification from Core for the OP_RETURN uncap is “harm reduction”. The argument is that inscriptions done via the segwit/taproot hack have potential to do more damage than inscriptions via OP_RETURN. Thing is, @LukeDashjr made a PR in 2023 to fix the vulnerability introduced by taproot. PR #28408 It would “effectively limit arbitrary data carried via newer methods (including SegWit witness data and Taproot scripts), which inscriptions/Ordinals were using to bypass the existing OP_RETURN-based limits and embed larger payloads.” If that had been merged, the current harm reduction narrative wouldn’t even be there. It wasn’t merged. Core didn’t want it. Peter Todd was among those who Nacked it with this rationale: “The transactions targeted by this pull-req are a very significant source of fee revenue for miners. It is very unlikely that minres will give up that source of revenue. Censoring those transactions would simply encourage the development of private mempools - harmful to small miners - while making fee estimation less reliable.” Note the use of the word “censoring” to describe fixing a very recently introduced vulnerability that opened up for ordinals. Self inflicted wound, willingly not patched up, used as rationale for a new self inflicted wound.

English
45
39
293
12K
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@DBonatOliv @21milinfinity Yeah some level of insecurity, dishonesty, and/or fakeness just from the pictures of a lot of them. Maybe not all of them. Dan Held definitely gives off all those vibes though. Dude was born to be a scammer 😂😂
English
0
0
0
3
Daniel Bonato
Daniel Bonato@DBonatOliv·
@21milinfinity I think what you are calling "soy face" is more that you are picking up some level of dishonesty or uncanny in their pictures.
English
1
0
0
9
Kretchino 🐸 BIP-110
Kretchino 🐸 BIP-110@kretchino·
@21milinfinity Retards hall of fame. After the fork, please mint them as NFTs on the spamchain, I'd love to buy a complete set for my grandchildren 🤗🤗🤗
English
1
0
0
7
Dimitri-H 🇧🇪
Dimitri-H 🇧🇪@Dimi_h·
Lo and behold. The intellectual depths of @MrHodl . Spam proponent. Anti BIP110 advocate. Shillfluencer. A simple plain lay down on how networks work is enough for a meltdown.
Dimitri-H 🇧🇪 tweet media
English
5
5
52
2.7K
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@coinjoined @mattkratter @1914ad you aren't blocked by him, so does that mean you couldn't come up with a good "technical opposition" to his "long refuted fragile ideas"? 😀
English
0
0
0
8
Coinjoined Chris ⚡
Coinjoined Chris ⚡@coinjoined·
Translation: I won't leave my carefully curated, monetized X echo chamber because I'm afraid of getting bodied again the moment I face an unfiltered audience on the Bitcoin-aligned free-speech platform nostr where only ideas, not clout, decide. Here I can comfortably block critics, prune the room, then brag there's no technical opposition to my long refuted fragile ideas. Sad.
English
4
1
61
1.1K
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110@mattkratter·
It's sad that Matt Odell has chosen not to engage in the spam debates on X, preferring instead his small Nostr echo-chamber. That's one reason why his takes on spam and BIP-110 are so fragile and easy to refute
English
19
27
299
8K
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@nvk @hodlonaut You wouldn't lose those coins tho. Unless you sell them
English
0
0
0
10
Joe_Hoegan
Joe_Hoegan@sleepin_volk·
@screentime I skipped the flashback. I literally skipped most of the episode because of it, I didn't give a shit about 1 second of his past. I wanted to progress the story.
English
26
0
51
12.6K
ScreenTime
ScreenTime@screentime·
‘A KNIGHT OF THE SEVEN KINGDOMS’ showrunner Ira Parker says “I hate that I've had to do a flashback” in Episode 5 “I do think it adds a lot to the story… But, yeah, it's gonna displease some people” (via: EW)
ScreenTime tweet mediaScreenTime tweet media
English
292
167
10.8K
1.7M
Fastbreak Hoops
Fastbreak Hoops@FastbreakHoops5·
Who is the worst player here?
Fastbreak Hoops tweet media
English
818
37
1.4K
394.1K
₿TC-GUS🧡🪢
₿TC-GUS🧡🪢@Scavacini777·
I'm done diving into the big blockers' side (bch side) I'm starting a week's long journey (starting by)reading the Blocksize war by Jonathan Bier. But I will mostly focus on the code, the people and culture of who was who, and who wanted what, and the repercussions of decisions
₿TC-GUS🧡🪢 tweet media
English
4
0
9
521
Cato The Elder
Cato The Elder@CatoTheElder17·
While disappointing to lose @hodlonaut for BIP-110, we must remember that his identity is public and he could be subject to external pressure. His reason is not convincing - of course miners may decide to not run it, that’s why we’ll force their hand. We’re not going anywhere.
GIF
English
10
18
169
5.9K
Whale's Secret - C# exchange API library
You are using the word bug in very wrong way. This is not what bug means in IT terminology. Bug kind of imply that it should be fixed. You can have a design bug, which is not possible to fix in the given design, that is, it would require complete redesign of the software in order to mitigate it. Having this class of bug means that your design is faulty. Other than this class of bugs, you generally want bugs to be fixed. But what you are talking about here are properties of the system that are unfixable due to the nature of any complex system. So unless you want to claim Bitcoin is fundamentally broken in its design, this can't be taken as a bug. This is not fixable. And even if you wanted to change the design completely, the system without this "bug" would be so much worse in many other aspects because to mitigate this "bug" would mean to accept tradeoffs that would just cripple Bitcoin in many other ways. This is why it doesn't make sense to classify this as a bug unless you want to claim Bitcoin to be completely broken. Also, "bug" means that the behavior of the buggy system is unintentional - that is the given behavior was not envisioned by the authors and it is contrary to their intent. This is not the case again. The ability to insert arbitrary data into blockchain has been known and it is inevitable within the given design. The developers always knew this was the case. So again, calling it a bug is simply wrong. As for the resource usage - yes, blocks on average may be perhaps small tens of % bigger in post-spam era than in pre-spam era. So yes, storage space (unless pruning) and bandwidth requirements are higher. Not to very significant degree though. The validation costs (CPU), however, are much smaller for large JPEGs inscriptions. So there is no overall dramatic increase in required resources. And since you mention the time to do IBD - this can mostly be optimized by using smarter code. You can have massive gains there just by doing better and better optimizations. This already have been done massively (you can try syncing some Core v22 or something and compare it with Core v30 to see how much it has improved), but there are still massive savings that can be achieve but further optimizations. That means the extra resources caused by spam are not significant. They are unpleasant, yes, but it's nothing too bad.
English
1
0
0
18
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@AlTheBoss03 Devin Hester, Barry Sanders, Bo Jackson, Michael Vick, Percy Harvin, Dante Hall, Randy Moss. At their peak such fun players to watch
English
0
0
0
32
altheboss
altheboss@AlTheBoss03·
Who was the most electric player ever to play in the NFL?
English
222
23
82
8.9K
Sickma
Sickma@Sickmaaa·
@cdcm99 I got mine today! Until he answers what he did on Epstein island he deserves no quarter. He knew about the victims and the man's history and chose to go there. There's no legitimate reason for that.
Sickma tweet media
English
0
0
0
10