Barkley Stockton
5K posts

Barkley Stockton
@VIPTranslations
I clean up roadkill for food
Tham gia Ekim 2020
342 Đang theo dõi126 Người theo dõi

@greta Because when you win a war it is an unconditional surrender, not peace negotiations. Because we haven’t forgot the last two decades unlike the goldfish class. Because anything less than unconditional is not winning. We know how decipher a win from a loss.
English

@KatiePavlich Nothing was accomplished in this last ceasefire but something will happen within the next ceasefire…???
English

From a senior administration official re: Iran:
- This MOU framework gives us 60 days to reach final deal points that will deliver on President Trump's priorities and ensure the United States and the region are safer and more prosperous going forward.
- The president has consistently said the Iranians cannot have a nuclear weapon. This MOU commits them to that.
- It commits the Iranians to giving up the nuclear dust and working out the mechanism for that will be part of us talking with the Iranians over the next 60 days.
- It gets the Strait of Hormuz de-mined and back open for business.
- It brings relief to American families at the pump. The President fought this war to protect American security and American prosperity, and this MOU delivers on both.
- The important part of how this is structured is, if Iran doesn't perform, they don't get anything. No dust? No dollars. As the Strait opens, the blockade loosens proportionately. This is "trust but verify" on steroids.
- Unlike past agreements where America paid Iran upfront and hoped they'd comply, this MOU is structured so Iran gets nothing until they deliver. That's the difference between a dealmaker and a hostage payer.
- The region is uniting behind the United States under President Trump's leadership. There's no way this could have happened without the entire region uniting behind it.
- As a result, we're on a path for this to be the President's second time reshaping the Middle East. It started with the Abraham Accords, this is the Abraham Accords Plus. Everyone's talking now. More economic normalization agreements are possible. This could be just the beginning.
- The MOU ensures we and our allies -- and the Iranians and their proxies -- cease fighting across the region. It also guarantees Israel's right to act against imminent threats. They, as we all do, have a right to self defense.
- President Trump has been a master of expanding optionality throughout this process. And now there are unlimited options for the region to spread peace and prosperity like never before.
English

@greninger_r @ClayTravis I know it was, but simple math is above you
English

@VIPTranslations @ClayTravis Surely you jest! That was aimed at you.
English

@nicksortor The point everyone is missing is the president needs to stop speculating and posting on social media of a peace deal. Start with him first
English

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump calls on people like Lindsey Graham to STOP SPECULATING about the potential Iran deal
“Nobody has seen it, or knows what it is. It isn't even fully negotiated yet. So don't listen to the LOSERS, who are critical about something they know NOTHING about.”
Pipe down, Lady Graham.
English

@TrumpWarRoom Translation: “I know I’ve made a situation much worse for Americans and people all across the globe, but trust me we’re making a deal”
English

@EYakoby Trump spent $30 billion more than Obama to accomplish less than Obama
We don’t call that a win in Texas
English

@marklevinshow Watching you slow roll the realization you’ve been played for fool has been entertaining to say the least
English

As most know, I am a huge Reagan fan. I campaigned for him in 1976 and 1980. I served in his administration for 8 years. But one of the biggest mistakes was amnesty granted to 2.3 million illegal aliens. And on top of that, amnesty was granted BEFORE the Democrats promised border security was funded. The Democrats simply refused to honor their part of the bargain. Reagan would later say it was a mistake.
Sequencing matters. I am opposed to a deal. I've been saying this for months. Congratulations to those who've wanted a deal. Looks like you've won the day. And, if a deal is made, the Iranian regime will survive, at least for now. We shall see how that works out over time. I am quite skeptical any deal can contain the enemy or will be enforced for numerous reasons, especially after President Trump leaves office, or that the terrorists will cease being terrorists.
That said, I have to assume that if there is a deal, the Iranian regime will be required to perform what it promises first -- that is, as a condition precedent to any relief. I believe it would be a huge mistake if not. Among other things, if the Iranian regime doesn't intend to follow through, we ought to know upfront not later. And it should be forced to reveal itself now. And releasing billions and billions of dollars to them, which was withheld before the war, will be nearly impossible to control once in their hands, and will be used to strengthen the regime. Of this I have no doubt. That's who they are. That's their mindset. They answer to no one but themselves.
And no Middle East country should be pressured to diminish its own national security for the sake of a deal. Will Hezbollah actually survive and reestablish its dominance over Lebanon, and be free to keep shooting missiles into Israel? Is that something we would accept? This needs to be very clear. "Israel's right to exist" cannot be only a slogan. So far, I see nothing about the ballistic missiles, which is the most potent conventional weapon the Iranian regime has in its arsenal. It'll be important to see how that is addresed.
I'll be very focused on a whole bunch of issues if a deal is made. We all should. It would be very strange if we weren't. This isn't just some foreign enemy thousands of miles away. It has killed and maimed thousands of our fellow Americans during the last 47 years. The President made the strongest case, repeatedly, for why military action was so essential and timely. It would also be far more fruitful, not to mention intelligent, if our senators and congressmen who want a deal would tell us what and how they think the specific mechanics of a deal should work from their perspective.
More later ...
English

@Kaelan47 Spent more than Obama to accomplish less than Obama
If you change the definition of winning to definition of losing then that’s winning in the eyes of Trump and his cum guzzlers
English

@FaytuksNetwork Trump turned our country into a @nbcsnl skit
English

The White House does not expect an agreement to end the war with Iran on Sunday and believes approval by Iran’s leadership, including Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, could take several days, a senior U.S. official told reporters.
U.S. officials remain optimistic a deal could be signed within days, but say it has not been finalized and could still collapse. — Axios
English

@JackPosobiec Panicking is changing the definition of words to save face
English

I voted for Donald Trump, I didn't vote for Panicans!
Kaelan Dorr@Kaelan47
Respectfully, Trust in Trump
English

@Kaelan47 He spent more than Obama to accomplish less than Obama
If you change the definition of winning to losing then I guess you can say that’s winning
English

@realannapaulina Not if the deal is worse than Obama, you seem to have forgot how to do simple math
English

@TreyYingst So he’s announcing stuff before Iran has even agreed to it again?
November will come and they’re still going to be arguing over the strait that was open before the war started
English

Senior administration official says the Iran agreement will not be signed today, but indicated progress on a deal.
"If the Iranians make significant accommodations on the enrichment question then we will make significant accommodations on sanctions relief,” the official said.
On the nuclear issue, the current plan is to deal with the entire stockpile of enriched material.
"If you have a final deal where the Iranian are enriching, then you don't have a final deal,” the official added.
English












