AlgorithmAnger

2K posts

AlgorithmAnger banner
AlgorithmAnger

AlgorithmAnger

@algorithmanger

Free Thinker, Optimist, Dreamer.

Earth Tham gia Haziran 2023
671 Đang theo dõi182 Người theo dõi
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
Further proving my point, “over 100…” so one percent of the estimated total crowd there? Committing violent crimes, is bad. They deserve punishment. But that’s less than 5% of who was there. Two crazy leftists tried to kill Trump, another crazy leftists tried killed Charlie Kirk-I don’t walk around saying leftists are all psychopathic murderers.
English
0
0
0
5
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump calls ELON MUSK his FRIEND “He’s 80% BRILLIANT, 20%, has moments” 🤣 “Elon had a bad moment but now he’s a friend of mine again.” 👏🏻 Elon gets it. It’s TEAM AMERICA all the way!
English
848
6.1K
52.8K
1.4M
AlgorithmAnger đã retweet
NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依
10 million Japanese > 100 million strangers in Japan. A country isn't a number. It's a people.
English
13
32
642
7.1K
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
@DNPinNYC @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh So to call the j6 people “rioters”, and also proclaim their violence is twisting math far more. It’s too broad. It is labeling quite a large group with a minorities actions. The 418 people? Sure. That 4.18% of the total crowd that gathered were clearly violent and rioting.
English
1
0
0
12
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
There were an estimated 53,000 people at the Trump rally. An estimated 10,000 or so went to the capital bldg. out of those nearly 1,600 or so were charged. Out of the people charged 418 are alleged to have committed acts of violence. So by the statistics we have, 4.18% of the total at the capital were alleged to be “violent”.
English
1
0
0
15
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
-this is just blatantly false. The only thing that was proven to have happened was Paul Manafort discussed internal polling data the Trump team paid a company to put together (CA specifically) with a Ukrainian national. Speculation that the person was Russian intelligence is just that-speculation.
English
1
0
0
6
Bachem Macuno
Bachem Macuno@BachemMacuno·
@algorithmanger @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh The only thing the FBI did wrong in '16 was not investigating the trump campaign more strenuously. The people working for the trump campaign should have set off alarms at the Bureau.
Bachem Macuno tweet media
English
1
0
0
13
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
@BachemMacuno @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh -far more sensitive is your interpretation, no evidence to show anything like that is actually true. There were some documents listed as “classified” -stole is entirely self interpolated as well, delays in returning documents does not equal theft.
English
2
0
0
6
Bachem Macuno
Bachem Macuno@BachemMacuno·
@algorithmanger @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh ..for them. While the govt pursued the far-more-sensitive docs trump stole for more than a year, he lied about having them and lied in court about having returned everything. While they were stored next to a photocopier.
Bachem Macuno tweet media
English
2
0
0
14
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
1. Biden didn’t find them, an attorney did. 2. The government did actually reach out before he returned them. NARA regularly reached out to Presidents and VPs once out of office especially to make sure any docs taken out come back. 3. Docs from Trump were returned in early 2022, the docs found later were about 100 documents including empty file folders.
English
1
0
0
8
Bachem Macuno
Bachem Macuno@BachemMacuno·
@algorithmanger @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh Do you assert false things because you don't know better, or because you don't think I know better? Obama didn't take classified docs, and aside from the docs Biden had being few & of lower classification, HE found them and notified the FBI; the government didn't have to ask...
English
2
0
0
9
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
Both Biden and Obama took files to other places or had them in areas not secure. Both times the govt looked at it and simply worked to retrieve the files. The action taken in trumps case broke precedent. Obama did push an investigation into the Trump campaign with a FISA that had 17 significantly questionable inaccuracies or omissions. He signed off on it himself. Basis for FISA was also the Steele dossier which was a competing campaigns made up smear campaign. Bidens DOJ most certainly took many questionable stances and actions most of which have no legal precedent or hold. Also Biden is not cognitive enough to ask for anything, my bad. I meant Bidens assistants and staff. The vast majority of political lawfare undertaken by both Obama and Biden administrations ignored legal precedent and policy.
English
1
0
0
10
Bachem Macuno
Bachem Macuno@BachemMacuno·
@algorithmanger @mariadestrella @EricLDaugh ..incompetents running their DOJ. It's unlikely that Biden would even ask to see the files, or that Garland would've complied. Remember, competence, policy and legality were a thing under real presidents who didn't long for autocracy and weaponize govt to be a vindictive bitch.
English
1
0
0
16
Gina
Gina@gina1244567·
@algorithmanger @nosoup4knowles @yoalexrapz If you can’t see the abhorrent lies that TPUSA spews and why they need to be reprimanded for them, no one can help you understand that. In Charlie’s own words, “When I see a story and it doesn’t click, our guts are usually right.” The truth will prevail.
English
1
0
1
26
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles@nosoup4knowles·
Candace leaked the US WEEKLY "request for comment" in a desperate attempt to get out ahead of the narrative and paint herself as the victim. Some of the statements within are so damning that she couldn't risk letting the piece be published before speaking out.
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles tweet media
English
63
157
1.3K
23K
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
About half of these were not promises but Trump quite literally saying “what if we did ____”. Aside from that the ballroom is being paid for by donors and Mexico is paying for the wall albeit in a roundabout way. Groceries are more expensive, they have been every year for the last 30. Gas is already back down to 3 where I live so hitting the 2’s will happen as well. Iran declared war on us decades ago and no President ever took the time to just deal with them - I don’t like it either but it needs to be done. Dudes been shot and shot at a bunch of times. More than any other president in the history of the USA…I’d say willing to risk death to say what you want is doing pretty well by free speech standards. In short, we could nitpick. I have things I dislike about his administration. Still has done the most change for good in our collective lifetimes for the longevity of our country and the future of our kids.
English
0
0
0
27
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
Epstein files have been in the hands of Trump, Biden, Trump, Obama, and likely Bush and beyond as well. If he has a “starring” role the movie would have been cut and released multiple administrations ago under either Obama or Biden. Both took highly questionable and likely illegal actions against Trump so clearly would have thrown him to the wolves had they the evidence to do so.
English
1
0
0
11
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
If we are going to quantify, then it needs to be specific. How many pardons total and which ones specifically are “indiscriminately” given? Sure, that guys is swinging a pole and potentially assaulting someone. Of the thousands of people there how many actually committed “acts of violence”? Furthermore, it’s already been proven that the government had agitators in the crowds. Until they quantify exactly how many and also clarify how many people were unnecessarily agitated you can’t claim it’s all “fair” or taken care of. Out of each 1,000 ppl, how many were “violent”? Based on summary screenings of footage they certainly seemed to arrest far more people than just “violent protestors”.
English
0
0
0
13
AlgorithmAnger
AlgorithmAnger@algorithmanger·
She has indeed shown screenshots of what she claims are “receipts”, but without actually proving you have them it doesn’t mean anything. You’d need up traced and end to end address confirmation to prove screenshots of any digital messages. Separately his “confidants” whoever they are alleged to be don’t have to prove anything to Candace. She was barely a part of TPUSA for 14 months. Most of the people there, including Erika, would be a more reliable source than a former disgruntled employee. Aside from all that, who cares? If Charlie had a desired successor, it most certainly would be his wife or best friends. Candace yelling “they lied” does not help bring “justice” or whatever she claims. The only individual gaining from this is Candace via money earned through controversial videos.
English
1
0
3
36
Gina
Gina@gina1244567·
@algorithmanger @nosoup4knowles @yoalexrapz Except she’s shown text messages, emails, receipts, etc. TPUSA keeps claiming Charlie would ask people to “screen calls” from Candace, yet she has his personal cell phone number. There should be some sort of memo or text to his confidants if this is true.
English
1
0
1
29
Leslie Phares
Leslie Phares@PharesLesl70438·
@nosoup4knowles You really think Tracy Martin comments mean anything to ppl who are actually paying attention to all of this? I let you know the answer, they are not.
English
1
0
1
48
Anne
Anne@Anne30201116875·
@nosoup4knowles Does this hit piece also include Mrs Erika Kirk telling a 15 year old girl she wants to touch her butt?
English
1
0
7
302
MayBerry
MayBerry@MayBerr14391505·
@nosoup4knowles Since they murdered Charlie,TP burnt it down All By Themselves, and it happened faster than most thought. TP 'leadership' is Disgusting...all of them. Look behind the "Veil of Lies", because the Veil is being Lifted, and all the young adults following TP are going to be Pissed!
English
4
0
1
124
Gina
Gina@gina1244567·
@nosoup4knowles @yoalexrapz And where is the verification that Charlie said any of this? Lol. If she gave him so much anxiety, why did he want to bring her back to Amfest?
English
1
0
5
290
Doris Lorenzo💥
Doris Lorenzo💥@Dloren305·
Candace didn’t ‘leak’ anything out of desperation she exposed a coordinated PR ambush designed to smear her before she ever saw the article. That’s not panic. That’s strategy. The reason the piece is ‘damning’ is because it’s manufactured. It’s Erika’s crisis‑PR machine trying to rewrite history and cast herself as the sainted widow while painting the one person Charlie trusted as the villain. Charlie loved Candace. Candace loved Charlie. They had a real bond, real loyalty, real alignment. He confided in her. He trusted her. He respected her voice. Meanwhile Erika has spent every minute since his death trying to position herself as the heir to his empire not the protector of his truth. A snake in the grass doesn’t mourn the tree it coils around. It waits for the moment it can claim the trunk as its own. So no Candace isn’t the one scrambling. The only person panicking is the one who knows the world is finally seeing the difference between Charlie’s real loyalties and the narrative she’s been selling.
English
19
0
20
826