Tweet ghim
dbk🕸️
2.8K posts
dbk🕸️
@dbkdraft
duke fan first almost spreadsheet fc all-around nerd
Tham gia Nisan 2025
91 Đang theo dõi76 Người theo dõi
@DysCgotHacked so you’d rather have a clear first option on a play in team than a 1b/second option on a championship team?
English
@Bron_Season @KyeWil13 @MIK3MCDANIEL he doesn’t have to be cp3 to return lottery value, he can do that by being a high impact backup pg who wins on the margins, which i dont see why he won’t do that.
English
@KyeWil13 @MIK3MCDANIEL Debatable especially now, very very very few guards are as small as he is especially with him being 173 pounds
English
I mean anyone with eyes knew Tyler Tanner was a demon, we not calling them “eye test fc” anymore they will be referred to as “Names FC” until further notice
English
@sirlofin @fnsnfndns when pat is off cam is functionally the center, it just further shows he isn’t a 5 and needs an impactful one on both ends of the floor to maximize his impact. something we essentially already knew.
English
@fnsnfndns This might be the most worrying part of Booz's profile outside of defense tbh
English
@JJGotitt @smoovebg @dalilgmayne good backup pg’s are very rare and immensely valuable so that’d be a good outcome tbf.
English
English
@GoatTalkC @philfanacc Gang no way you watched that game and thought wow Boozer is killing it
English
@notJoevsMoe @901Burner @desm0ndbane were the screenshots not good enough?
i can type out what they say if you want me to, it’ll be the same thing though.
English
@dbkdraft @901Burner @desm0ndbane So simple and yet NONE of you can prove how the formula is empirically derived.
Half a day asked the same question and multiple bozos can’t put their minds together to conjure up a direct response.
English
@KISSproductions @Oneiric47 what separates graves’s need for growth from anyone else praised for their potential?
i know it’s different for everyone but there are people who’d draft guys for potential and being “raw” even though they don’t win the margins like graves does.
English
@Oneiric47 The exact opposite actually. The graves truthers are coping with spreadsheets because it’s clear he needs more time
English
@901Burner @notJoevsMoe @desm0ndbane i think the fact that someone is denying something so simple and widespread is enough for me to just have ignored it but here we are.
English
@dbkdraft @notJoevsMoe @desm0ndbane His issue is that he’s a pseudo-intellectual who uses sesquipedalianism instead of making substantiative arguments. Just throws out jargon and pretends they were making a point the entire time to not have a single coherent statement until the 10th reply lmao
English
@JBBHoops1 i think some of love’s effectiveness with his power can be attributed to the era just as the shooting advantages cam has can be.
it’s obviously flawed but the functional similarities are pretty spot on and even with the era note i think cam is clearly the more advanced shooter.
English
@dbkdraft I don't get the point of comparing one and dones in 2026 to like 2006 or whenever KLove came out
But KLove's power was always outlier level for a 4, and super functional too. I don't think Boozer manifests comparable power in such ways
English
If Cam Boozer can be as good offensively as Minnesota Kevin Love he's number 1 without even thinking for me
El Jefe@ChaseEnCashe
Calling Cam Boozer “another Kevin Love” is not a diss. It only reiterates the point that a lot of y’all just started watching basketball
English
@notJoevsMoe @901Burner @desm0ndbane you the guy who won’t accept anything outside of pra and shooting percentages thinks that i listen to espn, lmao. what is the issue with the ts% equation, other than the fact you can’t understand it?
English
@dbkdraft @901Burner @desm0ndbane People like you just sit there and get fed at the trough with whatever ESPN serves you without any questions asked.
I’m 100% sure you don’t even know what it means to derive a formula and definitely never questioned anything.
English
@notJoevsMoe @901Burner @desm0ndbane making shit up to make it seem more complicated than it is because you don’t understand it is rich, ts% is widely accepted and not even considered an advanced metric.
English
@dbkdraft @901Burner @desm0ndbane Anyone can do FG% off the dome, it’s the most literal definition of what a shot is.
Why 0.44? What’s the empirical derivation for that coefficient
English