Debidoodoo

7.3K posts

Debidoodoo

Debidoodoo

@debidoodoos

Derby Tham gia Aralık 2010
739 Đang theo dõi438 Người theo dõi
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
This is literally insane Muslim man in the UK is interviewed and says that their goal is to take over the UK He says they’re working to vote in Muslims to keep replacing European Leaders, pass Sharia Law once they have the political power and then implement harsh punishments like stoning women to death for crimes like adultly What the heck is the UK doing??? They are literally telling you there are working on a political takeover and to pass Sharia Law We need to mass deport Islam from America before this happens to us too
English
334
4K
8K
59.9K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Rushi
Rushi@rushicrypto·
I just found out that water is considered a human right in Ireland, and households don’t pay water bills. Every country should be like that. Water is a human right and always should be.
English
586
8.7K
53.1K
367K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Tony Ward
Tony Ward@TonyWard867811·
You paid in for forty years. Never missed a day you could help. Never took a penny you hadn't earned. And this is the country they handed you back. Four million people now on sickness benefit. Half a million of them under thirty, signed off before they ever clocked a single shift. Your taxes don't build roads anymore. They don't fix the hospital you wait eight months to be seen in. They go to a bill so big the government now spends more keeping people unwell than it raises from every wage in the land. And when that runs short, they print. And the few quid you saved buys less every year to plug a hole you never dug. You did everything right. They did everything wrong. And somehow it is you left with nothing.
English
40
154
668
18.3K
Donna Louise
Donna Louise@DonnaLouise1212·
"My dead grandad & dad voted labour, so I've got to vote labour" "They'd be turning in their grave's if I voted anyone else, even though we've had labour for 40 years and our community, services, & rape gangs are totally fcked up"... What goes on in peoples heads?
Donna Louise tweet media
English
157
325
1.6K
13.9K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@NC1stinFreedom @TRobinsonNewEra Nope! Most people rely on MSM for their "news". In my small town people still go for covid jabs, etc - they are so brainwashed. I doubt many of them have any idea about the grooming gang report & the horrific abuse those poor girls suffered. They'll be the death of this country.
English
1
0
1
29
Appetite4Liberty
Appetite4Liberty@NC1stinFreedom·
For YEARS, the MSM media has used the name 'Tommy Robinson' just like any other weaponized label; racist, Nazi, Islamophobe etc. It has effectively silenced any discussion on the underlying issues. Legit question for those in the UK: Outside of X, are regular non-engaged citizens starting to see through this at all?
English
2
1
9
858
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
The BBC finally interviewed Rupert Lowe. Did they ask him about the rape gang inquiry? Of course not, they moaned about me to him. He put them in their place live on air.
English
313
5.7K
35.8K
363.4K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️@AwakenedOutlaw·
I just checked in on the BBC's website, and yup. Still not a damn word about the Rape Gang Inquiry Report. You know, the biggest scandal in the country/world... the one that they're completely ignoring. Weird, right?
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️ tweet media
English
42
571
1.3K
10.3K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
Not a single woman or child. Only military-age men. That’s because they are not refugees. They are soldiers, and this is a religious war of conquest. Europe needs to wake up.
English
2K
24.1K
74.1K
701.8K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
IMPORTANT COMMENT ⬇️
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo@RafHM

I'm tired of constantly having to say this: In every British election more people vote for LEFT wing parties than for right The right succeeded b4 because it was united & the left was split Makerfield again shows the left are more willing to vote tactically to block Reform than the right is willing to vote tactically to block Labour Green and Lib Dem voters showed no party loyalty, lending their vote to Labour. This was not reflected on the right. This is a disaster The right must get its act together and either unite or learn to vote tactically Does our fractured right really hate each other so much that we are willing to allow the Left to form the next government? I'm afraid we don't have time for this. Because there is another uncomfortable truth I keep repeating: Right wing voters are dying at TWICE THE RATE of left wing voters And they are not being replenished amongst the young. We have the most radically left wing youth in history (3/4 of youth are on the political left). We do not have time for the drama of right wing divisions. Britain's demographic time bomb means we only have one or two general elections left to save the country (and reverse the left's domination over youth education etc.,) To win a majority government the winning party must secure at least 31%/32% of the national vote. There must be sufficient unity or tactical voting on the right to enable that to happen. The Left won't be *as* united in a General Election as they were in Makerfield. Nevertheless, we are going to see them engage in tactical voting as NEVER BEFORE. This is the time to put emotion and everything else aside and face the cold hard mathematical reality.

Français
0
0
0
8
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Wrexham Unite 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
THEY REMOVED HENRY’S FLAG Our personal flag tribute to Henry Nowak has been ripped down and taken away from the Tesco roundabout in Wrexham. Our Flag Man made this one deeply personal, placing it proudly on one of the main roundabouts where the red dragons of Wales flew around our brother Henry. We felt compelled to honour him. Because without justice there is no peace. But now the flag is gone. Removed by those who clearly don’t want reminders of what happened to this innocent 18-year-old boy. A young man stabbed by a sword, murdered, then failed by the police as he lay dying, and now even his memorial flag in our town is erased? This is a disgrace. This is disrespect to Henry, and every single person who wants real justice. We will not forget. We will not stay silent. Share this everywhere. Make sure Wrexham, and the whole country, know they can take the flag down, but they can’t bury the truth. Our brother. Our son. #justiceforhenry
English
54
1.5K
4.6K
64.6K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
So Keir Starmer thinks the grooming gang scandal has been "overblown "! How dare he disrespect the thousands of young girls who have suffered at the hands of these degenerates! Hateful, Hateful man. 🤬🤬🤬
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra

ARE YOU ANGRY ENOUGH YET? SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!!! So @BretBaier speaks to @patrickbetdavid on the @PBDsPodcast and tells him that he actually asked British Prime Minister @Keir_Starmer about the 'Rape Gangs' which was brought to his attention by @elonmusk. All Keir Starmer could do was downplay the issue of generations of British girls being raped, pimped and prostituted by Muslim Pakistani gangs, telling Bret the issue has been 'overblown'. We will NEVER get justice for the children of the UK as long as we have politicians like Keir Starmer in positions of power. #TheRapeOfBritain #TheRapeGangInquiry

English
0
0
0
22
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
This is worth a read. ⬇️
Millie Marconi@MillieMarconnni

A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated. His name is Qing Li. He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea. The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason. Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005. He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest. Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty. The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected. The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly. Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty. Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month. Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet. The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation. The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall. When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab. Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system. This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress. A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower. The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down. Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks. They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone. The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk. After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature. What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care. But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free. The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish. Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens. Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.

English
0
0
0
3
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@ReilandJeffrey @JENpatriotic @LaurenVella82 Because this report has not been published or discussed on the msm. Not BBC, ITV, Sky TV, or most newspapers. Most people are entirely ignorant about this. And indeed about most things! Not everyone is on X, sadly. Normies still call us conspiracy theorists. 😕
English
1
1
4
70
Jen-English-Patriot
Jen-English-Patriot@JENpatriotic·
When your police take a young girl who was raped by pakistani immigrants and return her not to her parents, but to the pakistani immigrants and tell them to 'have fun with her,' your entire system has to burn.
English
222
3.2K
20.1K
152.6K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
Remember when they sold us the slogan, “Go paperless, save trees, save the planet”? Now we've gone digital, and it's consuming enormous amounts of water, destroying ecosystems, harming bees, and contributing to environmental damage on a scale paper never did.
English
55
3.2K
14.1K
89K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
The EU Acted. Hungary Acted. The US Acted. Britain Signed Hotel Contracts Until 2039. Yesterday the European Parliament voted 418 to 218 to pass the strictest returns legislation in EU history. The lead negotiator described it as the final missing piece of Europe's migration system. After almost twenty years of standstill, he said, Europe finally has effective return measures. The vote followed the Chișinău Declaration of 15 May, signed by all 46 Council of Europe member states, pushing back against the European Court of Human Rights' increasingly expansive interpretation of migration law. Europe's governments, operating inside the ECHR framework, have decided they have had enough of judicial overreach. They are acting anyway. Britain's removal rate for illegal arrivals stands at 4%. The EU's removal rate, the number so catastrophically low it triggered yesterday's emergency legislation, stands at 20%. Britain is removing at one fifth the rate of a system the EU itself just declared broken beyond tolerance. While announcing it wants to stop the boats, the Home Office has signed accommodation contracts for asylum seekers running until 2039. A government that intends to remove people does not contract for 15 years of housing them. The standard explanation is the ECHR. Ministers have cited it for years as the primary obstacle to removal, the external constraint that ties Britain's hands regardless of political will. It is worth examining that claim against the Court's own published data. Of more than 430,000 applications processed by the ECHR in the past decade, fewer than 2% concerned immigration. Of those, over 92% were dismissed. Fewer than 450 cases, one in every thousand applications to the Court, resulted in a finding of human rights violation on immigration grounds. The obstacle is not in Strasbourg. It is in Chancery Lane. The domestic immigration tribunal system, staffed in part by judges whose documented backgrounds lie in open-borders advocacy, produces rulings that no democratically elected parliament ever intended and that the ECHR itself would not require. And the institutional machinery surrounding it ensures that challenging any of this carries consequences. A new Islamophobia definition, opposed by the government's own former anti-extremism adviser and by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is being embedded across every school, hospital, broadcaster and public body in the country. Two-tier policing, documented in Hampshire's own Race Action Plan and in the College of Policing's guidance, conditions officers to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. The framework does not just permit the embedding of mass migration. It is designed to make objecting to it a disciplinary matter. The EU has now demonstrated, within the ECHR framework, that effective returns legislation is achievable. Hungary has demonstrated that a 4% removal rate is a political choice, not a legal inevitability. The United States has demonstrated that border crossings can be reduced from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government deciding to act. Every external constraint Britain's government cites as the reason it cannot act has now been dismantled by other governments operating under comparable or identical legal obligations. Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years, maintained by an institutional framework that classifies concern about it as extremism, and defended by a legal excuse that the EU just voted 418 to 218 to stop hiding behind. The smugglers did not build this system. The government did. Yesterday, 418 members of the European Parliament decided they had had enough of pretending otherwise. Britain's government has not. "Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years"
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
66
759
1.4K
19.8K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Christian
Christian@InTheTrenchesUK·
MOTHER ENGLAND IS BLEEDING She has been betrayed. Not by enemies at the gates, but by the permanent government within. And they are mortgaging her future. Four people. Four names you never voted for. Four people who control more power than the Prime Minister, more power than Parliament, more power than you. And they are borrowing billions from your children to pay for it. DAME ANTONIA ROMEO - The Bully She controls 500,000 civil servants. Her own staff called her "unreasonable, degrading, demeaning." She repaid £31,000 in dodgy expenses. Investigated for bullying in New York. Multiple women came forward. Starmer promoted her anyway. She decides what ministers see. She decides what policies live or die. She runs the machine that outlasts every government. SIR JAMES BOWLER - The Debt-Maker He controls the Treasury. The borrowing. The "no" to tax cuts and the "yes" to debt your grandchildren will pay. He admitted Britain is "dependent on the kindness of strangers" to borrow. He commits billions that future governments cannot undo. Four Chancellors have come and gone. He remains. He has never faced a voter. GARETH DAVIES - The Gatekeeper Fresh into Home Office, now controlling who enters, who stays, who is removed. The borders are his. The policing is his. The small boats keep coming. He keeps his job. Who appointed him? Why now? What commitments has he made that will bind the next government? VIJAY RANGARAJAN - The Sovereignty-Giver He negotiated the Chagos handover. British territory given to Mauritius. The cost? £35 billion. A 99-year commitment that binds your grandchildren. £101-165 million every year until 2124. Long after Starmer is dust. Long after the next government is forgotten. The payments continue. The unelected man who gave away British territory now runs British elections. He investigates Reform UK repeatedly. Finds nothing. Questions about Brendan Cox associations. Questions about loyalty. THEY WERE ALL APPOINTED WITHIN THE LAST TWO YEARS. Romeo - February 2026. Bowler - entrenched since 2022, borrowing for decades. Davies - April 2026. Rangarajan - March 2024, committing billions for a century. Fresh appointments. Fresh power. Fresh debt. They will outlast Starmer. They will outlast the next government. The permanent government commits. The elected politicians pay. Your children inherit the bill. WHO DO THEY REALLY SERVE? Not you. You never voted for them. You cannot remove them. Yet they control the money, the borders, the elections, and the civil service. They borrow billions your grandchildren will repay. They give away territory your grandchildren will never reclaim. They make commitments that bind for 99 years. They hide behind "operational independence." They hide behind "expert advice." They hide in plain sight while mortgaging your future. MOTHER ENGLAND IS BLEEDING. Her sovereignty sold for £35 billion. Her borders open. Her elections overseen by the sovereignty-giver. Her Treasury run by the debt-maker. Her civil service run by bullies. Her future mortgaged by people she never elected. This is not democracy. This is intergenerational theft by bureaucratic dictatorship. WHO HAS THE RECEIPTS? I am compiling the complete dossier. If you have evidence, documents, verifiable facts about these four, submit them. Facts only. Sources required. The next government must remove them. All four. On day one. Cancel the Chagos commitment. Fire the debt-makers. Clean house. No more operational independence. No more expert advice. No more permanent government. No more borrowing from our children's future. Mother England will not bleed forever. The British people will not be ruled by those they never elected. And we will not pay for their 99-year mistakes. Submit what you have. I will verify. I will publish. I will not stop. Your move.
Christian tweet media
English
207
2.7K
4.4K
71.2K
Debidoodoo đã retweet
Alan
Alan@A1an_M·
This story is a good example of quite a number of things. 1. It's a good example of the poor quality of BBC "science journalism". 2. It's a good example of how big corporations and their interests have captured mainstream media. 3. It's a good example of why we really need independent social media (and why governments and large corporates, which have essentially merged together (into a form of corporatism as Mussolini define it) don't like social media and want it censored). Let's look at what the story says. The headline says "Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine". Specifically, they say "Between 2020 and 2024, no cervical cancer deaths were recorded in women aged 20 to 24 - the first time that had happened over a five-year period." But routine vaccination of 13 year olds only started in 2018. So the earliest children vaccinated in 2018 would only have been 19 in 2024 at the end of their study period. And we know that even prior to vaccination starting, the number of deaths in 20 to 24 year olds was always close to zero (see graph). So the claim is misleading. Not factually incorrect, but giving a false impression. It's disinformation, in fact. Making us think the vaccine has caused a dramatic improvement, when it has not. If we look at that graph, we can see that the trend is for deaths in all age groups to fall over time, a long time before vaccination started. So the decline in deaths is clearly due to something else (routine cervical screening and earlier treatment being the prime candidate). The BBC journalist who wrote this story has clearly put zero critical thinking into it. The company responsible for the HPV vaccine might as well have just written it verbatim and given it to the BBC to publish. Maybe they did? Let's project ourselves into the future, where all social media users have to provide government ID to access social media, and governments can track who is posting what, and identify and single out "troublemakers", critics and whistle-blowers for their social media posts. Do you think they will stop at censoring and banning people breaking the law, or do you think they will tackle people who are merely criticising flaws in the narrative using data and evidence? Well, we don't need to be Mystic Meg to imagine the future. We can just look back to 2020-1 and see what happened then. Exactly what I described. Government disinformation units tackling what they called "misinformation" and "disinformation" which turned out to be inconvenient truths about lockdowns, vaccines, masks, social distancing, government statistics. So without social media, big corporations and governments can get away with pushing their propaganda through unquestioning mainstream media journalists. That's why we need independent social media. As for the HPV vaccine: it might turn out to be a life-saver. But given that the first cohort of teenagers who received the vaccine in 2018 are now only 31, and the median age at diagnosis with cervical cancer is 45, we are not going to know for sure from empirical data for another decade or more. There are also potential confounders here. In parallel with the introduction of the HPV vaccine for teenagers, cervical cancer screening processes have been changed. Screening is starting at a later age, and is now focusing on detecting HPV rather than directly looking for cancer, and increasing the intervals between screenings. These changes alone may well result in the appearance of less cancer in younger age groups, but risk a big spike in cancers being detected at a later age. The authorities are tilting the table in favour of the vaccine pushers in the short term, but possibly at the expense of women in the longer term. And the other thing we will likely never know is whether the total effect on health from the HPV vaccination is a net positive. Little point in saving 20 cervical cancer deaths per 100,000 people if the vaccine itself is directly causing more than 20 deaths and chronic illnesses per 100,000 people from adverse effects. Why won't we ever know this? Because long-term comparisons of death and illness from all causes between vaccinated people and those receiving a saline placebo is almost never done. Studies always look narrowly at the target disease alone with a very brief and temporary consideration of adverse effects. This ⬆️ is the kind of in-depth analysis our national broadcaster should be doing, in the public interest. Not just parroting vaccine manufacturer talking points. But when you point this out, you get accused of being a conspiracy theorist, and the BBC sets the spook-y Marianna Spring on you. 🙄🕵️‍♀️
Alan tweet media
BBC News (UK)@BBCNews

Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine bbc.in/4ovjOLq

English
45
224
591
31K