ُ

4.6K posts

ُ banner
ُ

ُ

@kelevitch

space policy and international relations @ajialqtr https://t.co/fwNAGGJjry

🇶🇦 Tham gia Ekim 2019
264 Đang theo dõi8.7K Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
Why The West Is Falling - Hegelian approach "The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk." Hegel Hegel told us something terrifying: you only truly understand an era once it's already dying. Wisdom doesn't arrive at dawn. It arrives at dusk - when there's just enough light left to see what went wrong. We can now see the Western order so clearly, its contradictions, its violence dressed as virtue Hegel's core insight: every system produces the contradictions that destroy it from within. The Western order was built on promises: sovereignty, human rights, consent of the governed These were the ethical substance of a civilization. The story it told itself about why it deserved to lead. Now watch the contradiction consume it: War without congressional authorization. International law shattered for the “rules-based order.”Nations bombed into rubble for “freedom” 63,000-year-old heritage destroyed - by the “civilized”world. Schoolchildren in mass graves by nations that lecture on human rights. A president who bombs "for fun" in a system built on consent. This isn't hypocrisy bc hypocrisy implies awareness. This is a civilization that has exhausted its capacity for self-correction. The principles exist as words but they've been emptied of meaning. When principles become tools of domination rather than constraints on it - the ethical substance is gone. What remains is force. And force without substance is what we saw in every empire before its fall. ‘The Master Who Forgot How to Build’ Hegel's most famous reversal: the Master-Slave dialectic. The Master dominates. The Slave submits. But over time, the Master stops working, stops creating, only consumes and becomes hollow. The Slave, through labor and endurance develops what the Master never will: a genuine relationship with reality. The reversal is inevitable. The US doesn't build. It bombs. Its bridges carry a C-grade. 25 million lack health insurance. It can't manufacture many of the weapons it fires. Meanwhile China builds. Belt and Road. Semiconductors. Renewable energy. It brokered the Saudi-Iran peace deal the US destroyed with bombs. The Master demands "unconditional surrender". The Slave builds a new world while the Master is distracted by his own wars. WAR AS A REVELATION Hegel understood: war reveals truth. What has this one revealed? That the “rules-based order” has no rules only authors and subjects. That alliances are hierarchies Gulf states refused their airspace and got bombed anyway. Zero allies volunteered warships. That human life is valued by passport - 165 schoolgirls in a mass grave merit an “investigation.” One missile near Tel Aviv is a global crisis. That the NPT is dead - every nation just learned that negotiating your nuclear program gets you bombed. Keeping your weapons keeps you alive. The war didn't create these contradictions. It revealed them. Hegel believed the West's great contribution was the UNIVERSAL- universal rights, universal law, universal humanity. That is what's dying. Not because someone conquered it rather because the West revealed its universal was always particular. Its rights always selective. Its law always had exceptions written in invisible ink, legible only to the powerful. A civilization that bombs "for fun" has abandoned the universal. And Hegel warned: without the universal, all that remains is power. Power without legitimacy is tyranny. And tyranny always produces its own overthrow. The old order is thrashing. Bombing countries from a list in 96’. Seizing islands. Threatening allies. Demanding surrender from civilizations older than its own constitution. But in the cracks - BRICS, yuan trade, new diplomacy, rising narratives — the new world is being built. Not through conquest. Through construction. Exactly as Hegel predicted: the Slave's labor producing the future the Master cannot imagine. The Owl of Minerva is flying. It always flies at dusk. And it never lies about what it sees.
ُ tweet media
English
1
42
106
10.3K
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
The entire American-Israeli empire was built on one thing: the myth of invincibility. 1967 created it. Six days. Three armies defeated. The world said: untouchable. For 58 years, that myth kept the region in line. Don't resist. You can't win. They're invincible. October 7 shattered it. A group with no air force, no navy, no satellites breached every defense Israel had. And now Iran a country under 45 years of sanctions, one of the most economically strangled nations on earth is doing this: Shut down the Strait of Hormuz. Zero traffic. First time in history. Hit Israel's largest refinery. 50% of its fuel supply. Deployed hypersonic missiles that Israel's OWN missile defense chief says are "impossible to intercept" Hit A US F-35, the most expensive weapons program in human history, $1.7 TRILLION just made an emergency landing after a mission over Iran. CENTCOM won't say if it was hit. Acountry under sanctions since 1979 just touched the "untouchable." And the IRGC says: "The missiles we've been firing are from a decade ago. We haven't used our newest weapons." Now look at the cost: 🇺🇸 $11.3 billion in ONE WEEK 🇺🇸 $50 billion more requested 🇮🇱 $826 million emergency vote at midnight while DENYING a shortage 🇮🇱 $44 million per interception (11 Patriots × $4M each) 🇺🇸 THAAD pulled from Korea. Marines pulled from Japan. Munitions pulled from the Pacific. 🇺🇸 ZERO allies sent warships. France said no. Germany said no. NATO said no. Iran spends $500K on a missile. The US spends $44 million stopping it. That math doesn't work. And empires don't fall from one battle. They fall from the math. Rome didn't fall in a day. It bled out fighting wars it couldn't afford on frontiers it couldn't hold. The Soviet Union didn't lose to Afghanistan militarily. It went bankrupt trying to win. America didn't lose Vietnam in combat. It lost the will to keep paying. And now? $11.3 billion a week. Oil at $115. Gas up 86 cents. NATO refusing to help. Pacific stripped bare. China watching. Russia profiting. Against a country using decade-old missiles. That hasn't deployed its best weapons. That is fighting without a single ally sending troops or money. And Israel? Israel dragged America into this. Every war Israel fights, America pays for. Every interceptor, every carrier group, every F-35 sortie American money. American soldiers. American debt. Israel's wars don't weaken Israel. They weaken America. And when America is too weak to fight Israel's wars what happens to Israel? The myth of invincibility is already broken. The only people who don't see it are the ones still living inside it.
English
1
4
20
292
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
@WarMonitors But according to Trump Irans military is defeated
English
0
0
0
110
War Monitor
War Monitor@WarMonitors·
Now that everyone calmed down can we actually begin to ask how tf Iran was able to even lock on to F-35 in the first place, let alone hit it without flare dumping. Crazy.
English
425
785
12.2K
733.1K
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
The strategic logic is clear: control the islands - control the Strait approach - clear the mines - reopen shipping. But the execution is catastrophically risky: The military risk: These islands are within range of Iran's entire coastal defense network, anti-ship missiles, mines, fast attack boats, and drones. Landing Marines on islands 50km from Iran's coast under fire is one of the most dangerous amphibious operations imaginable. The escalation risk: Iran has said landing on the islands is "an act of invasion." If US troops are on Iranian-claimed soil, Iran can frame any response as defending sovereign territory , the same justification every country uses for total military mobilization. The political risk: Trump said "this is not an invasion of Iran." But US Marines on Iranian-claimed islands IS an invasion by any definition. When Democrats and anti-war Republicans call it an invasion, Trump will say it's about the Strait. But the images of American troops on Iranian soil will define the war. The quagmire risk: Once Marines are on those islands, how do you leave? If Iran keeps firing at them, the US needs to maintain and reinforce the positions. If the US leaves, Iran reclaims them and declares victory. It's a one-way door. From "4-5 weeks of air strikes" to ground troops on Iranian territory in 20 days. The escalation is now following the EXACT trajectory of every failed American military adventure: limited strikes - expanding operations - ground forces - quagmire.
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara

BOMBSHELL! Netanyahu just casually admitted on live TV that there will be a GROUND INVASION of Iran. The air strikes were just the beginning of a massive, devastating regional war.

English
2
9
22
1K
AbdelAziz
AbdelAziz@AbdelAz74986780·
@kelevitch Trump just rejected the idea of sending troops "anywhere"
English
1
0
0
32
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
@FurkanGozukara The last man who tried to reshape the Middle East by force was the last Crusader king. His kingdom lasted 192 years. Israel is at 78 and i don’t think they’ll make it to 100
English
1
0
11
1.2K
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
BOMBSHELL: Netanyahu accidentally reveals the REAL reason for the war. It has nothing to do with nukes. He admits the plan is to build oil pipelines through the Middle East straight to Israeli ports, completely bypassing Arab-controlled straits. It is all about money and control.
English
753
8.5K
22.3K
2M
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
I don’t know if you understand how insane this is but Israel dropped the “targeted raids” language and announced "full-scale ground maneuver." Forces have pushed NORTH of the Litani River. Southern Lebanon has been cut into three sectors. UNIFIL positions are surrounded. This is no longer a security operation. This is an INVASION. And an OCCUPATION in formation. But nobody will use those words. Because the US will veto any UN resolution that does. 950 dead. 1 million displaced. 16% of the country homeless. Forces north of the line that was supposed to be the limit. “Security corridors” being built for permanent presence. The dictionary has a word for this. Everyone knows it. Nobody in power will say it.
Lowkey@Lowkey0nline

The moment Israel targeted British journalist Steve Sweeney in southern Lebanon.

English
0
12
31
488
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
Eid Mubarak to brothers and brothers only, as for the sisters i will dm my best wishes
English
5
6
59
1.2K
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
@hamad_abdulg تقبل الله منا ومنك صالح الأعمال يا شيخ
العربية
0
0
2
66
TheCommentator{Amalek}
TheCommentator{Amalek}@hamad_abdulg·
May Allah accept everyones efforts and may your scale bring a smile to your faces on the day. Blessings to you and your families this Eid.
English
3
0
7
100
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
Israel is now striking Iranian targets in the CASPIAN SEA. The Caspian Sea borders Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan. This war started as “take out Iran's nukes.” It's now reached a body of water that borders Russia. Also today: A US F-35 made an emergency landing after a combat mission over Iran. CENTCOM won't confirm if it was hit by Iranian fire. If an F-35 - the most advanced fighter jet on earth was hit by Iranian fire, that changes the military calculus completely. But CENTCOM isn't saying. Which tells you everything.
English
2
0
15
487
ُ đã retweet
Hassan I. Hassan
Hassan I. Hassan@hxhassan·
I’m convinced most officials & specialists are too immersed in the moment to realize a certain basic fact about why Iran is striking the Gulf. When Iran was fighting in Syria & Iraq, its field commanders & their proxies (and their ecosystems in countries of Iranian influence) always promised that the next battle would be in the Gulf. This was conveyed, explicitly or otherwise, by Qassem Soleimani and allies like Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, Hassan Nasrallah and the Assad regime. It was part of a doctrine guiding Iran’s regional strategy, not mere passing comments. (The same language that Israel began using against regional countries only recently. “Qatar is next” or “Turkey is the new Iran” etc. Iran has used that language for many years.) Now, Gulf countries look at Iran and wonder: Why is Iran hitting us when we tried to talk Trump out of striking it? Iran knows we tried our best. Iran’s action is understandable if it targeted the UAE and Saudi Arabia, but why mediators like Qatar? Yes we have US bases, yes we can scream at the US, but it still makes little sense, even from a basic divide-and-conquer strategy. But Iran sees this war as having begun at least a decade or so ago, and the Gulf states played a vital role in getting Iran to where it is today. The Gulf is the problem, not just Israel or the US. Strategically reckless, but that is the plain IRGC logic. This is clear if those officials had followed the rhetoric over the last 1-2 decades and the nitty-gritty behavior of Iran on a ground level outside Iran.
English
44
102
297
101.4K
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
So Trump started a war with no plan which led to him lifting the sanctions on Russia giving him back the leverage he lost over Ukraine and is now considering lifting the sanctions on Iran as well to ease the closing of the strait as well the damage done to gas infrastructure He’s losing in every way imaginable. Terrible.
English
5
5
29
568
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
@WhiteHouse Israel has the American government in hostage
English
1
4
39
414
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
Statement from President Trump on South Pars Gas Field:
The White House tweet media
English
12.6K
8.9K
40.8K
16.9M
ُ đã retweet
ُ
ُ@kelevitch·
I WILL SAY IT AGAIN Martin van Creveld one of Israel's most prominent military historians, professor at Hebrew University said this on the record: “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome.” "We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under." Rome. The seat of the Vatican. 1.4 billion Catholics. Not a threat from an enemy. A threat from a professor at one of Israel's top universities. This doctrine has a name: THE SAMSON OPTION. Named after the biblical figure who destroyed a temple, killing himself and everyone inside. The policy: if Israel faces existential defeat, it will use nuclear weapons against EVERYONE enemies AND allies to ensure the world goes down with it. This country: Has 80-400 nuclear warheads Has ICBMs that can reach any continent, Has nuclear-armed submarines built by Germany (😂) Has never signed the NPT. Refuses all inspections KIDNAPPED THE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO EXPOSED THE PROGRAM And it has never been sanctioned. Never been bombed. Never been condemned. It receives $3.8 BILLION per year in American aid. The country threatening to “take the world down” is the one being funded. The country that negotiated its nuclear program is the one being bombed.
Power to the People ☭🕊@ProudSocialist

BREAKING: The Independent is reporting officials at the World Health Organization admit they are preparing for a “worst-case scenario” of nuclear weapons being used in the U.S. and Israel’s war against Iran. Iran has no nukes so that would mean the US and Israel would drop them.

English
74
1.6K
2.6K
84.8K