Shelli G

10.3K posts

Shelli G

Shelli G

@shellig

UF / GT grad and Air Force Brat. Nerdy engineer with great friends! Will not reply to bots, -50 followers, not read thread, not making sense

Atlanta, GA Tham gia Aralık 2008
6.2K Đang theo dõi1.4K Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@davidhogg111 We should “provide for the Common Defense” in the same way we currently “promote the General Welfare”, by providing weapons and training to every citizen. (To be clear I believe the Federal Government far exceeds their enumerated powers but let’s make that balanced at least.)
Shelli G tweet media
English
7
5
36
6.5K
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@JINVISIBLEWOMAN Wonder what the success rate is for the different techniques of grafting.
English
0
1
1
6
JJ
JJ@JINVISIBLEWOMAN·
WHAT SORCERY IS THIS?! Grafting is supposed to be hard… but this? Looks EASY. Bookmarking for later. Ever done this yourself?
English
8
3
19
4.5K
Steve Milloy
Steve Milloy@JunkScience·
No, the facts about birthright citizenship are not racist: 1. The 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provision was intended to make citizens for former slaves – not anchor babies of 21st century illegal alien invaders. 2. Although the 1898 Supreme Court case of US v. Wong Kim Ark improperly extended the 14th Amendment to include the child of Chinese immigrants, at least Wong Kim Ark's parents were in the country legally as permanent residents. You can't say that about anchor baby parents. 3. BTW, the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional in the first place as it was improperly ratified. Southern states weren't allowed to vote on it in Congress; they were forced to ratify it before they could be readmitted to the Union, which Lincoln said they had never left; and New Jersey rescinded its ratification well ahead of final ratification but was counted anyway. Amy Coney Barrett knows this. repository.law.upenn.edu/documents?sear… 4. If we had a properly functioning government: SCOTUS would trash the 14th Amendment in Trump v. Barbara, which will be argued Wednesday, April 1, 2026. Congress would then re-draft the 14th Amendment and have it properly ratified. Instead, we will likely get more disastrous SCOTUS overreach. washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/…
English
12
30
117
4K
Fox News Politics
Fox News Politics@foxnewspolitics·
SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN: Justices will hear arguments on Trump's birthright citizenship order this week. The case challenges the 14th Amendment's 156-year-old guarantee that children born on U.S. soil are automatically citizens. foxnews.com/politics/what-…
English
30
9
48
3.7K
Shelli G đã retweet
mike bski
mike bski@BskiMike22802·
THE FLAG THEY BURNED AND THE ONES WHO BLED FOR IT I cried doing the research for this. Only tears that a combat veteran would not be ashamed of. More than once. I am not embarrassed to say that. I am a science teacher and a medically retired Army combat medic with 23 years of service. I have held men together who were coming apart in ways that would make most people close their eyes and look away. I have been in places and made decisions that follow me into rooms where I am supposed to feel safe. I do not cry easily. But I cried writing this. And I think that is exactly as it should be. Because if you do the research — if you really sit inside these stories and not just skim the surface of them — and you feel nothing, one of us is broken. I am fairly confident it is not me. So. Let us talk about a flag. And what it actually costs. — The Decision Nobody Talks About — There is a decision that combat medics make that nobody talks about at the dinner table. You do not read about it in the news. Politicians do not bring it up in speeches. But every combat medic who has ever worked a mass casualty event knows exactly what I am talking about. And most of us spend the rest of our lives carrying it in a place that does not have a name. You are at my CCP. The world is loud and wrong and smells like things that should not have a smell. My hands are already doing the assessment before my brain has fully caught up — fast, mechanical, exactly the way they trained me. I go down the line. One man. Serious wound. Survivable — IF I start right now, right here, and I do not stop. I KNOW I can save him. I have the training. I have the supplies. My hands already know what to do. But there are two more. And they are also dying, but each one not as bad, not as time consuming. If I stay with him, my friend, my Brother, the other two are gone. If I move on, he is gone. The math is the math. Save my friend or save two of my Bothers. It does not care what I feel. It does not care that he has a name, he is my friend, that I know the name of his wife… his kids… that I have talked to his family on the Satellite Phone. It does not care that somewhere there is a woman who said goodbye to him at an airport and is going to get a knock on her door that will divide her life into a before and an after. I move on. He dies. And two more live from his sacrifice… from my sacrifice. And I live with that. Not because I did something wrong. Because I did something RIGHT. I did it by the books! And the books saved two when only one would have lived. Because the math said two lives outweigh one and I had the composure to do the math in the worst moment a human being can be asked to do math. I replay it… again… and again… and again. Every quiet room. Every night that runs too long. I replay it and I come to the same answer every time and it does not help. At all. I am a medic, and that is my job, to save the most I can and let the rest be a sacrifice for the survivors, for if I tried to save them all, all of them would have perished. There are rules of being a combat medic, even if not written, we know them… Rule 1: Good People Will Die Rule 2: Doc Can't Save Everyone Rule 3: Doc Will Go Through Hell to Break Rules 1 & 2 This is the curse of a combat medic. To be the Attorney of the fallen, to plead to God for one more day, one more chance, one more evac to the next level of care… but I can only have so many clients in the same hour. I have made that call. I live with it… some days better than others. I was still in country but imagined I stood at the grave of the man I chose not to save. I have watched the honor guard carry his flag-draped casket with the kind of precision that only exists when it is the last thing you can give someone. I have watched his widow receive that folded triangle. I have stood there knowing — KNOWING — that the flag on that box passed directly over a hole in the ground where a decision I made was to allow him, someone I could have saved on a normal day, to die, because this was no normal day, and instead chose two of his brothers to litigate for their survival. Two for the cost of a friend. Math and emotion know no wars. So when I tell you the flag is not a piece of cloth, understand where that is coming from. — The Funerals — I need you to sit here for a minute. Not scroll. Sit with it. There is a protocol called the transfer of remains. A military casket comes off a plane. The flag is on it — not a crease out of alignment, not a single imperfection anywhere — because this is the last thing the military can give him, and it is going to be given perfectly. It does not matter if you are in a war zone or you are state side. When these service members get transferred, everything stops. Planes are not loaded, buses stop, mission prep stops. Every service member is halted in respect, even for a single casket with a flag draped on top. This is what defense of the flag with one’s live mean on a FOB. We all make a moment of silence in respect for the Brother or Sister who sacrificed their life for the flag and their country. They make it home, and we still carry on the fight for them. The honor guard moves with a precision that does not exist anywhere else in civilian life. Every step deliberate. Every motion exact. Because the ceremony is not for show. It is the nation saying — through the rigid, unwavering discipline of its ritual — WE KNOW WHAT THIS PERSON GAVE. We know. And we will not let them go without being witnessed. Twenty-one guns. Three volleys. The sound goes into the trees and comes back wrong. Every combat veteran in the crowd flinches at the first one and tries not to show it. Some of them do not succeed. That is not weakness. That is the body remembering something the brain is still trying to process. And then Taps. Twenty-four notes. Played at American military gravesides since the Civil War. If you have never stood at one of those funerals and felt those twenty-four notes hit you somewhere behind your sternum — and refuse to leave, days later — then you have not yet felt what I am trying to describe. I do not say that to be unkind. I say it because it is true. Those notes go somewhere in the body of a person who has served, and they do not come out. The flag is folded. Thirteen folds. A tight triangle of blue and stars. A soldier kneels. On behalf of the President of the United States, the United States Armed Forces, and a grateful nation, please accept this flag as a symbol of our appreciation for your loved one's honorable and faithful service. She takes it. She might be nineteen. She might have a child on her hip and another one coming she has not told anyone about yet because she was waiting to tell him first. She might be holding herself together by something that has no name in any language and no equivalent in any civilian experience. She holds it on the way home. She puts it somewhere she can see it. And on the nights when the house is too quiet and the chair at the dinner table is a wound that does not close and the world has moved on in a way that feels like a personal cruelty — she looks at that folded triangle. THAT flag. The one in her hands right now. THAT is what you are burning. — The Bill — Here is what I am proposing. Read the whole thing before you react. There is a serious constitutional argument underneath it and I have thought about it carefully. The Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. Johnson (1989) and United States v. Eichman (1990) that burning the American flag is protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment. I agree with this ruling, surprisingly. But not as you may thing. I have fought for your freedom of speech, my brothers and sisters have dies to protect this freedom of speech, from the government! HOWEVER. Every person who has put on the uniform of the United States Armed Forces has taken an oath. Not to a president. Not to a party. Not to any political figure alive or dead. To the CONSTITUTION — and the flag of the United States is that symbol that stands against all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is on our shoulder when we go to war. It flies over bases, FOBs, COPs in every foreign land that troops are stationed. That oath does not come with an expiration date. Ask any veteran you know. It lives in the body long after the uniform comes off. So here is the First Amendment tension that nobody in Washington is addressing: If a person has the constitutional right to burn the flag as protected symbolic expression, and a service member has a sworn constitutional oath to defend that symbol of the constitution… our flag — an oath made under legal penalty, governing their entire adult lives, sending them to the places where they watched flags draped over their brothers — then THAT SERVICE MEMBER is also engaged in a constitutionally grounded act when they place themselves between a flame and that flag. Both parties are exercising rights derived from the same founding document. The flag burner invokes the First Amendment. The veteran invokes the oath that made the First Amendment possible in the first place. My proposed bill is this: any person who has taken the military oath of enlistment or commissioning, with documented service in the United States Armed Forces, regardless if they served in a combat zone or personally witnessed the flag draped over the remains of a fellow service member — that person is legally protected from civil and criminal liability for ANY physical action taken to prevent the burning of an American flag in a public setting. As the poem says “Now there's but one shot in this old gun, So now it's time to decide which one, Which one of you will follow our lead, To stand and die for what you believe?” I put my life on the line knowing that I may be in a box draped by that flag. It is time for the people who want to exercise their freedom of speech to have that very same honor, to stand up and die for what they believe in. No arrest. No lawsuit. No criminal record. Because if you want to exercise your First Amendment right to burn the symbol of a country that my brothers died for — the symbol that came off the plane on their caskets, the symbol their widows are holding right now in quiet houses — you are now standing in a crowd where at least one person has sworn, under oath, before God, that they would defend it. You have the right to burn it. I… WE… have the right to stop you, by any means per our oath and to defend what our brothers and sisters would do if they were still alive. By any means! I am not the government as much as you are. The Government is not restricting your freedom of speech, I am fulfilling my oath, as in individual! I am embracing my freedom of speech, No, I am embracing the freedom of speech for all of my brothers who have died in service of this country since 1776, for my fallen brethren by destroying anyone who are willing to burn their casket covering. That is not a contradiction. That is the First Amendment working exactly the way the Founders intended — two competing rights, both rooted in the Constitution, working themselves out in the public square without the government pre-deciding which one wins. — What I Need You to Understand — The reason I cried researching this — and I said it at the beginning and I will say it again because I refuse to be embarrassed by the truth — is the accumulation of it all. The medic's calculation. Two lives for the cost of one. Math that does not care about names. The twenty-four notes that do not leave. The widow who does not let go of the triangle. The flag is not the cloth. The flag is the CHOICE. The choice to stand when everything says run. To hold on when everything says let go. To put your body between what you love and what is trying to destroy it. THAT is what the anthem is about. THAT is what the twenty-four notes are about. THAT is what every flag on every casket is about. You want to burn it, bring your lighter. Put your life on the line to burn that flag. I dare you! With this law, you have the freedom to burn the flag… but I will protect the flag with my life as I have done for the last 23 years, and I do not think you are ready to protect your right to burn it with the same vigor and sacrifice, for I will protect it to MY DEATH… so good luck! But I want the man in that crowd who folded that flag for a widow he never met — who stood at attention for someone else's husband, dry-eyed and straight-backed because she needed him to be — to have the legal right to stand between you and that flame without being handcuffed for it. He already spent years doing exactly that. The least we can do is make sure we do not arrest him for doing it one more time. But what do I know — I am only a medically retired Army combat medic who has made the calculation you can never take back, who has watched a flag-draped casket pass over a hole in the ground where a decision of mine is buried alongside a man I could have saved on any other day, who has placed a folded triangle into hands that shook in a way I still see in the quiet rooms, and who has enough respect for every one of them to refuse to let their symbol go without saying something. Share this if you have ever stood at a graveside while those twenty-four notes told you something words never could. Share if you support our Flag and the ones who died and where covered by it to protect the rights of those who burn it. #MAGA #Veterans #Trump @DC_Draino @EndWokeness @catturd2
English
8
20
54
2.2K
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@elonmusk But it can't count characters when suggesting a post for X.
English
0
1
1
23
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@w_terrence Empowering their base that they are "doing the right thing" and likely ensuring they vote. Even though they can't articulate what the protest was about.
English
0
0
3
88
Terrence K. Williams
Terrence K. Williams@w_terrence·
What did the No Kings protesters accomplish? Serious Question
English
3.3K
286
4.2K
155.1K
Indeductive- merely a player in language games
People like you who claim to have won the argument didn't know the definition of the term and failed to score the point they thought they did *Lack of commitment* IS Infidelity She was right. You're wrong. Driena Sixto = 1 Rachel Wilson = 0
Indeductive- merely a player in language games tweet media
English
7
0
2
1K
Rachel Wilson
Rachel Wilson@Rach4Patriarchy·
Most people don’t really know how to read a study and interpret data, and some people literally just lie about what their source material says, thinking you won’t check it. Always check.
English
122
241
3K
71K
Shelli G đã retweet
Everyday Astronaut
Everyday Astronaut@Erdayastronaut·
I'm honestly SHOCKED at how the general public has NO IDEA Artemis II is taking humans out to the moon and will be the furthest humans have ever flown. Every non-space nerd I've talked to has no idea. WE GOTTA GET PEOPLE STOKED!!!! THESE FOUR HUMANS ARE FLYING TO THE MOON!!!
Everyday Astronaut tweet media
English
4K
6.3K
36.1K
1.3M
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
Shelli G@shellig

@micah_erfan In the same session Congress passed the 14th Amendment, it had already enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1866, denying citizenship to U.S.-born children “subject to any foreign power.” No effort was made to repeal it, showing the 14th didn’t change that view.x.com/shellig/status…

English
0
0
1
78
Leading Report
Leading Report@LeadingReport·
BREAKING: SCOTUS is about to consider upholding President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order.
English
640
1.5K
21.5K
8.1M
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@elonmusk If only it could get a character count right for a post suggestion. Losing faith.
English
0
1
2
17
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Grok automatically translating and recommending 𝕏 posts from other languages is starting to work
English
11.2K
17.6K
244.2K
66.5M
Pamela
Pamela@65FreedomLover·
@shellig @KathyMicha42842 @teammagakim @jason_meister @MNmurlz The fact is, no one can make you do anything you don't want to do. You make the choice of giving in or taking your chances w/ a new direction. I didn't give in to my employer's demands. I thought I might lose my job too. But I took my chances, period.
English
1
0
1
17
Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸
Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸@jason_meister·
Imagine throwing a “No Kings” protest after your party refused to hold a primary, coronated Kamala without a single vote, sued to keep RFK Jr. off the ballot, and attempted to remove Trump from state ballots only after your illegal lawfare scheme failed. If there was a modern day monarchy in America there would only be one party you could point to. The Democrats.
English
1.1K
8.6K
35.2K
607.4K
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@65FreedomLover @KathyMicha42842 @teammagakim @jason_meister @MNmurlz The fact is, vaccination status was routinely asked for when hiring or keeping jobs—**regardless of profession**. Not just healthcare, it hit corporate offices, manufacturing, educ,, gov contractors, transportation, & more. Many large employers across industries required proof.
English
2
0
0
9
Shelli G đã retweet
Kyle Becker
Kyle Becker@kylenabecker·
This is the best takedown of "No Kings" I've seen yet. "You just hate what you're told to hate..." "I just wish the anti-authoritarian energy was present during actual tyranny." 🔥
English
336
5.2K
16.3K
343.5K
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
And every single time I hear this argument I think about sexual harassment in the workplace. How is that (generally) any different? You must give in to your boss or lose your job and maybe never get a good recommendation or be black balled, is that your *choice*? Coercion is force.
English
0
0
0
15
Pamela
Pamela@65FreedomLover·
@KathyMicha42842 @teammagakim @jason_meister @MNmurlz You weren't forced. You gave in to keep your job. You could've most likely pursued a different job or career if necessary. MANY did. I was going to let my employer fire me after working there for 20+ yrs. They decided to honor the SCOTUS's decision in my case. Thank God.
English
2
0
1
18
Shelli G đã retweet
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, Wow. Just wow. Democrats didn't block Trump's nominees, @SenateGOP did. You had the majority. You failed. Republicans rejected Trump's picks. That's not on Democrats. We aren't Marxists; we believe in historical fact. And the fact is, you torpedoed @EagleEdMartin over manufactured outrage about January 6, while ignoring actual violence your constituents face. You don't get to revise the record. You own this. You talk about being the party of personal accountability. Stop attending lobbyist steak dinners and start showing it.
English
1.4K
18.9K
42.1K
363.1K
Shelli G
Shelli G@shellig·
@washingtonpost The article does not have any supporting info on the "long-term" trend. "the buds didn’t reach the first of six bloom stages — green buds — until March 11, later than average" is not explained either... what is "average" for that? Terrible journalism.
English
1
0
27
322
The Washington Post
The Washington Post@washingtonpost·
Breaking news: Cherry blossoms at D.C.’s Tidal Basin reached peak bloom today. This was the seventh year in a row that peak bloom was earlier than normal, part of a longer-term trend driven by climate change. wapo.st/4dbGXPI
English
147
62
281
46.1K
Shelli G đã retweet
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, Let's expose what you're really doing with "reconciliation." You announced it yesterday, eleven months after the House passed the SAVE America Act. You're not trying to pass this bill. You're trying to kill it in a way you can blame on process. Here's how we know: Reconciliation requires the Senate parliamentarian to rule that provisions are "budgetary." Citizenship verification is not budgetary. Photo ID mandates are not budgetary. The parliamentarian will gut the bill. Then you'll shrug and say "we tried." We see through you. Meanwhile, you WON'T use the tools that actually work: Rule XIX limits each senator to two speeches per legislative day. Keep the Senate in continuous session, file cloture daily, and the filibuster exhausts in ~12-20 days. You dismissed it as "complicated." Because if you tried and succeeded, you'd have to actually pass the bill. Harry Reid nuked the filibuster in 2013 when he wanted results. Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules THREE times and canceled the August recess. Chuck Schumer used reconciliation within months on a 50-50 Senate. You have 53 seats. You've changed nothing, canceled nothing, and waited eleven months. Now let's talk donors: • Goldman Sachs: $150K to you - top H-1B user • Google: $75K - lobbies against E-Verify • Meta: $72.5K - Zuckerberg's FWD[.]us pushes mass immigration • Wells Fargo: $90K - banks undocumented immigrants Same corporations sponsor Punchbowl News, where you sit for "Fly Out Days" which nobody watches except Congress staffers and K Street lobbyists who pays premium bucks for legislative intelligence. Their reporter then telegraphs to the audience the SAVE Act "will ultimately fail." Corporate money flows to you AND to the outlet that frames your inaction as inevitable. We see the loop. You called grassroots anger a "paid influencer ecosystem." YOU are the paid influencer. You take the wrong side of a 80% issue because you are indistinguishable from a K Street mouthpiece, and an ineffective one to boot who won't bend the rules to get anything passed. What we want: 1. Force a real talking filibuster. 2. Stop hiding behind process. 3. Pass the SAVE America Act. YOU will become the reason that we will have our butts kicked in midterms. Not Candace Owens, not Nick Fuentes, not anyone else. You and you alone, and all because you want to make the 200 or so viewers of Punchbowl Fly Out Days happy. You're living in a K Street information bubble, addicted to the comforts and praises of lobbyists masquerading as journalists. You mistake the steak and martini dinners you get invited to as your own constituents. You are not "moderate." The SAVE America Act has 98% support among Republicans. Name one other thing that has 98% support. You are an extreme minority who prides himself on being a calm leader, when in reality you are well in the running for the most ineffective Majority leader of all time. Prove me wrong. Do the bare modicum of effort. Not symbolic. Actual effort. Cancel the recess. Get SAVE America Act passed.
English
4.5K
33.3K
71.3K
1.4M