Post

@BitcoinErrorLog People who have any interest in making Bitcoin a successful project used by humanity at scale....
Should soundly reject such a silly position.
English

Not the faith that moves effortlessly in full confidence but the faith that moves anyway, even when the movement is halting, and the confidence is thin. Not the faith that never questions, but the faith that questions and remains. Guard it not as a relic — something precious but inert, kept behind glass and admired from a distance — but as a living thing that must be fed, that can be wounded, and that, if tended, will outlast everything that tried to kill it.
Wealth can be rebuilt. Reputation can be recovered. Position, influence, even health — these have been restored to people after losses that appeared total. But there is no external force that can restore faith to a soul that has surrendered it from within. That work belongs to the person alone, in whatever remains of the hour they have left. The good news, and it is very good, is that as long as the person is breathing, the hour has not expired. The door is still there. And the reach towards God, however faint, is never too weak for Him to take.
Prince S.J. Samuel
April 2026
English

@BitcoinErrorLog Is that to say, if quantum comes at scale, bitcoin is fucked anyways? Because the tradeoffs to make it quantum resistant aren't a feasible long term solution?
English

For your attention: there is a serious matter of criminal media data, coded and embedded in the Bitcoin block chain and is being included into the proof-of-work and mining data.
The segwit (segregated witness) feature was introduced and allows for the criminal media data to be validated by segwit alone.
I am making efforts for an urgent investigation to take place.
English

@BitcoinErrorLog "I'm okay with never changing my password from "123456" to a stronger one, and more people should be considering that position"
English

@BitcoinErrorLog Any quick bullet points to why?
I don’t agree on freezing bitcoin, to be clear.
English

@BitcoinErrorLog You can stay in your chain. Nobody with real money in BTC want to risk that. Your nodes, your choice.
English

@BitcoinErrorLog The simple reality from what I understand is Satoshi era P2PKH are at risk.
If that is what it takes to ‘unlock’ Satoshis coins and bring them to market, everyone wins because that’s more sats on circulation once again.
English

@BitcoinErrorLog It will be hard fork anyway, so just keep your coins, right?
English

@BitcoinErrorLog It can be added as a soft fork and people can choose to use those addresses.
It’s the only way.
English

@BitcoinErrorLog "I'm okay with Bitcoin being cryptographically insecure and dying and more people should be considering that position." Why do you want more people considering retarded positions?
English


