Wilkie

68/69❌ 69/70❌ 70/71❌ 71/72❌ 72/73❌ 73/74❌ 74/74❌ 75/76❌ 76/77❌ 77/78❌ 78/79❌ 79/80❌ 80/81❌ 81/82❌ 82/83❌ “Relegated” 83/84❌ 84/85❌ 85/86❌ 86/87❌ 87/88❌ 88/89❌ 89/90❌ 90/91❌ 91/92❌ 92/93❌ 93/94❌ 94/95❌ 95/96❌ 96/97❌ 97/98❌ 98/99❌ 99/2000❌ 2001/2002❌ 2002/2003❌ 2003/2004❌ 2004/2005❌ 2005/2006❌ 2006/2007❌ 2007/2008❌ 2008/2009❌ 2009/2010❌ 2010/2011❌ 43 years without winning any trophy. “Manchester City is bigger than Arsenal”🤡

🚨Genuine Question; what’s Joško Gvardiol have over Piero Hincapie in terms of defense??

Rivalry aside, Viktor Gyökeres has the coldest celebration in world football right now.

Friendly reminder that Viktor Gyökeres rejected teams like: Manchester United Chelsea Liverpool Manchester City Real Madrid Barcelona Everton He only anted Arsenal Football Club that’s he got many haters😂

What does Haaland have over Gyokeres 🤔

But 3 members of the Mna City squad/Management have called the refs cheats and corrupt and next no punishments given......I bet Maguire gets banned.

Which club record is hardest to break?

Foden is one of the most system-dependent players at the elite level, and that’s not even meant as a criticism, it’s just the reality of how his game is built. Phil Foden thrives in structure. At Manchester City under Pep Guardiola, every movement is choreographed spacing is perfect, rotations are automatic, and passing lanes are always available. That environment amplifies Foden’s strengths. tight control, quick combinations, and intelligent positioning in half-spaces. But the flip side is that he’s not a natural “chaos creator.” He’s not the type to grab a game by the scruff of the neck in a broken structure, carry the ball 40 yards repeatedly, or impose himself physically when things aren’t flowing. When the system breaks down or he’s placed in a less controlled setup, like with England national team at times, you see that drop-off. He can look harder to profile, even invisible in games where the structure isn’t serving him. Compare that to players who are more system-independent they can function in multiple roles, different tempos, and less organized teams without losing their impact. Foden, on the other hand, is more of a “final piece” player. Put him in the right machine, and he looks world-class. Take him out of it, and you start asking questions about where exactly he fit Under Peo he has role clarity with micro-freedom. Foden knows his role within the structure, but he’s given freedom inside his zone. He can, drift between lines, pop up centrally or wide, arrive late in the box But he’s not responsible for organizing the entire attack that burden is distributed across the system. That’s why when you remove those layers like in a less cohesive national setup such as England team, you see a different version of him. The spacing isn’t as precise, rotations aren’t as synchronized, and the tempo can become inconsistent. Suddenly, he has to create structure himself, which isn’t naturally his game. It’s not a limitation as much as it is a specialization. Foden is the kind of player who maximizes order. In the right ecosystem, he doesn’t just fit in, he becomes one of the most efficient attackers in the world.