FilthyBloke

Never mind will Starmer survive. It’s the British public surviving that I’m worried about.

Keir Starmer is not answering the specific questions from Kemi Badenoch on the advice given BEFORE the vetting. He is waffling, stuttering and lying through his teeth. This is a farce. #PMQs

There is only one person responsible for the appointment of Mandelson. Only one person who needs to take total responsibility Keir Starmer. Resign.

Resign you bleating goat. Lie after lie after lie. Keir Starmer should resign.

@AntSpeaks 😱😋is that like an option? If it is I’ll say yes please! The man has been brainwashed by his party & civil service into thinking exactly that & we all worship the ground he walks on🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I just caught a few minutes of today’s PMQs. Starmer has absolutely no intention of resigning. He seems convinced that the majority of Brits actively want him to remain Prime Minister. It’s beyond a joke. Come the elections in May, when Labour is wiped out, he still won’t resign unless he’s literally dragged out of No. 10. Either that, or the US would have to step in and do a Maduro on him.

The fact that Labour MPs are shouting in support of this disgraced prime minister at #PMQs, is sickening. They’re all in this together. All incompetent and rotten to the core. They should all be thrown out.

עם ישראל חי🇮🇱

Not one labour MPhas got the guts to stand up to starmer fucking shameful

@ramonagusta There in a nutshell!

Starmer: "Appointing Mandelson was a serious error of judgement and I'm sorry". Also Starmer: "Olly Robbins made a serious error of judgement so I have sacked him. Hypocrite.

Keir Starmer’s missing the point. If he needs a vetting process to tell him Peter Mandelson was a terrible choice for Ambassador, Starmer hasn’t got the judgement to be Prime Minister

Are you with me? Proove it ✌️

There’s no-one left for Keir Starmer to push in front of the bus. It’s time for him to finally take responsibility for his actions.

The Man Nobody Is Talking About. His Name Is Sir Philip Barton. Buried inside Tuesday's committee testimony, beneath the headlines about constant pressure, bullying and secret job searches, is the detail that may prove the most consequential of this entire affair. It concerns not Olly Robbins, not Morgan McSweeney, not even Keir Starmer. It concerns the man who was there before all of them. The man who said no. The man who then left his post eight months early. Sir Philip Barton was the Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office when Peter Mandelson's appointment was announced in December 2024. He was, in other words, the most senior civil servant in the building at the precise moment the machinery of state was being directed to place a man with documented links to Russia and China into the most sensitive diplomatic posting in the Western alliance. What Robbins told the committee on Tuesday is this. Barton pushed back. When the Cabinet Office argued that vetting Mandelson was unnecessary, that a peer and Privy Councillor did not require developed vetting, Barton refused to accept it. He insisted that vetting was a requirement. He had to be, in Robbins's own words, very firm in person. He also voiced reservations about the appointment to Jonathan Powell, the National Security Adviser, reservations that were noted and not acted upon. He was worried, Robbins suggested, about exactly the same reputational risks that had been detailed to the Prime Minister before the appointment was announced. Then Sir Philip Barton left his post. Eight months before his tenure would otherwise have concluded. The question Richard Foord put to Robbins on Tuesday was the right one. Why did Barton's tenure end early? Robbins said he did not know. He suggested ministers may have felt it was time for a change. That answer is not an answer. It is the absence of one. Consider what the timeline now shows. A senior civil servant pushes back against the appointment, insists on vetting when the Cabinet Office wants to bypass it, raises reservations with the National Security Adviser, and departs eight months ahead of schedule. His replacement arrives to find the appointment already treated as a fait accompli, the vetting process under constant pressure from Downing Street, and the question of outcome entirely subordinate to the question of speed. If Barton was removed because he stood in the way of this appointment, then Robbins was not the first civil servant sacrificed to protect it. He was the second. And the question of who else was moved aside, overruled or silenced in the months between December 2024 and the moment the security services finally said no, becomes the most important question this affair has yet produced. Starmer sacked Robbins for following the rules. The Foreign Affairs Committee will now call Barton to give evidence. What he says will either confirm what the timeline already suggests or provide an alternative explanation that the evidence does not currently support. There is a pattern here that goes beyond process failure. Process failures are random. They point in different directions. What this affair has produced is a series of events that point consistently in one direction. Officials who comply are retained. Officials who push back depart. The security services are bypassed. The vetting is treated as an administrative inconvenience. And the one question nobody at the top of this government will answer is why this appointment, this man, this post, mattered so much that every obstacle was removed to make it happen. Barton apparently asked that question. He left eight months early. The country deserves to know why.

He can't help himself and he doesn't care.

@KingTunde_SZN 15283

PAY ATTENTION TO DETAILS Nobody is yet to find the number 👀 What number is in the box? RT Correct answer wins $6,000 Ends 50 hrs

Angela Rayner will take over as PM after the Labour's local election whitewash. She will be even more dangerous and dishonest than Starmer. Zack Polanski and Angela Rayner are by far the two most frightening, corrupt, unprincipled political figures in Britian and it's not even CLOSE. The 15-year old high school dropout will become Britain's Prime Minister. A true shambles that shows the depths to which our political class has descended...

@Luna_Jones79 Much like Trump himself I’d much prefer it it iran grew up & recognised a good deal when he sees it but failing that iran cannot have nuclear weapons!

Be honest!

@Babywwir Big fat NO!

Should Pork be removed from school Cafeterias out of consideration for Muslims? Yes No

@polvetes @Welshgoonerboy I like it both ways, greedy I know🤷🏻‍♂️

Retwitea si te gusta dar o recibir lluvia dorada 🍆💦💦💦😛

@Kirilllion_off @everyfagsdream We love all of you Kirillion! 👍😎🥰

Do you like my nipples?