Codebuff 已转推
Codebuff
323 posts

Codebuff
@CodebuffAI
Better agents. Better code. npm i -g codebuff
Your terminal 加入时间 Ekim 2024
16 关注2.1K 粉丝
Codebuff 已转推

We upgrade our file picker agent to use Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite!
It's 4x faster than Grok 4.1 Fast was.
Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMind
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has landed. It’s our most cost-efficient Gemini 3 series model yet, built for intelligence at scale. Here’s what’s new 🧵
English
Codebuff 已转推

Codebuff 已转推

NEW Claude Code & OpenCode KILLER! This Just Fixed 90% of AI Coding! (Open Source): youtu.be/4H_an5xtyr0

YouTube
English
Codebuff 已转推

Recently saw a video by @piyushgarg_dev on @CodebuffAI and I wanted to try it out but I didnt want to make anything generic so I asked it to make a Temple usin three JS and the outcome is crazy!
English
Codebuff 已转推

I found a better terminal agent that beats Claude on benchmarks.
Personally, I tried fixing a complex bug: it got it done in 4 minutes, whereas Claude took around 8 minutes for the same task.
@CodebuffAI

English
Codebuff 已转推
Codebuff 已转推

Just tried Codebuff, a really great alternative to Claude Code, works a lot faster ⚡️ and burns less credits!
You can try it too + get 500 free credits on using my referral link:
codebuff.com/referrals/ref-…

English
Codebuff 已转推

We just switched @CodebuffAI free mode to use MiniMax M2.5.
On our benchmark, the score increased substantially:
54% => 75%
Major upgrade!
Previously we were using GLM 4.7 + Grok 4.1.
MiniMax (official)@MiniMax_AI
Introducing M2.5, an open-source frontier model designed for real-world productivity. - SOTA performance at coding (SWE-Bench Verified 80.2%), search (BrowseComp 76.3%), agentic tool-calling (BFCL 76.8%) & office work. - Optimized for efficient execution, 37% faster at complex tasks. - At $1 per hour with 100 tps, infinite scaling of long-horizon agents now economically possible MiniMax Agent: agent.minimax.io API: platform.minimax.io CodingPlan: platform.minimax.io/subscribe/codi…
English
Codebuff 已转推
Codebuff 已转推

Just ran Opus 4.6 vs 4.5 on our coding agent evals.
It's noticeably better and costs about 10% more, likely due to more token usage.
Opus 4.6
Score: 8.54/10
Cost: 1.578
Duration: 476 sec
Opus 4.5
Score: 8.27/10
Cost: 1.4118
Duration: 445 sec
Opus 4.6 is live in @CodebuffAI!
English
Codebuff 已转推

"I Deleted Claude Code After Finding This!"
Great deep dive on why @CodebuffAI's batteries-included approach is better.
youtube.com/watch?v=y_6hlg…

YouTube
English
Codebuff 已转推

Since the last few days, my MacBook Pro battery has been going from 100% to basically 0% in 2-3 hours running Claude Code.
This is when I came across @CodebuffAI, which provides a similar, if not better, experience at using Opus 4.5 for my local coding tasks.
Video out now

English
Codebuff 已转推

@CodebuffAI on max mode and best of "n" is addictive to watch! Best CLI UI I have seen!
English

Our old tagline was:
"Make your terminal write code for you."
Let's just say that since we wrote that, having your terminal write code for you has become a lot more popular.
Codebuff@CodebuffAI
New tagline
English







