
F.I.S.H
6.5K posts

F.I.S.H
@FISH_Operator
🇦🇺 Zebra pilled I love liberty, prosperity, and sloths. Has a pet spider named Bonnie to keep the mozzies away Don't step on snek Anime is trash and so am





#BREAKING 🚨 NSW independent MP Helen Dalton will NOT run in the Farrer by-election, saying her fight in the state parliament is "producing results" The move avoids a by-election in her state seat of Murray and leaves Michelle Milthorpe as the sole independent running








@kevinbonham proposes a new Australian flag but I can’t give him my response as he, like so many others, has blocked me. @kevinbonham you are a deadset fucking flog. You’re welcome 🖕🖕🖕 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺 Can we all let Kev know just what a tool he really is? Thanks




So for starters that's not your case, you are using AI, which is frequently wrong about elections and often (as in this case) doesn't even understand the question. My linked article already noted there are *some* cases where majors have won seats off preferences of the other major, but they are outnumbered heavily by preferences causing majors to lose to non-majors. Of the supposed examples your AI gives: * SA 2018: The Liberals preferenced Labor in a couple of seats and both majors ran a split ticket (which means not recommending preferences either way) in Hartley. These decisions had no impact as SA-Best did not make the final two in any seat where a major had preferenced the other. In most seats the majors put SA-Best ahead of the other major. * 1990 federal: This example is not even relevant as it concerns major parties receiving preferences from minor parties which is not what the discussion is about. * Qld 1998 and 2001: This is covered in my article. While it is true that in Qld 1998 Labor preferences saved three Nats from losing to One Nation, there were also seven cases in 1998 and one in 2001 of One Nation beating Labor from behind on L-NP voter preferences.













