I'm Spatial
3.7K posts
I'm Spatial
@Im_spatial
Hitting the Reset Button and learning from my mistakes…
In a van by the river 加入时间 Ocak 2013
687 关注194 粉丝
@Im_spatial @VDAREJamesK I understand her just fine, but nice attempt at cope buddy
English
It's precisely because she is so stupid that she is the most effective justice. You know exactly what she will rule in any situation. It doesn't matter what the law says. Untroubled by self-doubt, propriety, or questions of objective truth.
Masterful pick by Biden.
Headquarters@HQNewsNow
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: How does this work? Are you suggesting when a baby is born people have to present documents? How are we determining a newborn child is a citizen of the US under your rule? Are we bringing pregnant women into depositions?
English
@CommSchoolHater @VDAREJamesK Just because you can't understand her doesn't mean she's dumb. It means you are.
English
@Im_spatial @VDAREJamesK If you listen to her speak and think she's smart, I have bad news for you
English
@C_3C_3 Think about what you are arguing for logically. Every single American has always proved citizenship via birth certificate. You are suggesting throwing that out. How do I prove citizenship in your scenario? Would I now have to have my parents birth cert too? Absurd.
English
@AndreasSteno Ask Rubio that question again today and you'll get some crazy gymnastics on what should be an easy question.
English
What Jesus says about homosexuality or any other sin is the end of the discussion. He is Lord of lords and King of kings. Your opinion about it doesn’t matter.
English
Democrats will fight harder for the baby in the womb of an illegal to become an American citizen, than they’ll fight for the baby in the womb of an American, and their right to life.
Birthright citizenship is a scam.
English
@Freedomphora @EndWokeness By stepping foot on their soil you are agreeing to be subject to their laws. Just because you don't understand her legal terminology doesn't mean she's wrong. She's WAY smarter than you.
English
@EndWokeness KBJ just proved she's unfit for the bench. Stealing a wallet in Japan makes you subject to their laws because you're on their soil—not because you're suddenly Japanese.
English
Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance."
Her case for birthright citizenship:
English
@TexasCowgrl1111 Because oil exists in a global market. If China is short on oil (and they are) they offer to pay much more for it which raises everyone's prices.
English
@ChristianHeiens You are cherry-picking words and then choosing to exclude other words that blow your opinion up. I suppose nobody should expect better from a dude throwing out vulgar slurs.
English
How fucking retarded do you have to be to believe that the original intent of the 14th amendment’s authors was for citizenship to be automatically granted to the children of tourists, illegals, and even enemy combatants who are being held on American soil?
The man who wrote the amendment quite literally went on the Senate floor and publicly declared that it wouldn’t apply to foreigners or aliens.
Cheese For Everyone!@CheeseForEvery1
And the First Amendment doesn’t apply to the internet and the Second Amendment doesn’t cover the AR-15. After all, the Framers never conceived of these things.
English
@Creslin321 @JonAguiar Exactly what was historically bad about Kamala other than she was a black lady?
English
@JonAguiar A. You clearly don't know what "advanced dementia" looks like. These people can't even recognize their own family.
B. Kamala was not a "historically bad" candidate. She was just a black lady.
English
Trump is a dumpster fire
Biden had advanced dementia
Kamala was a historically bad candidate/unlikable
All 3 of these things can be true at the same time
English
@lanebrown_3 "sharing his Christian beliefs" is not a good interpretation of what he was doing.
English
Karl Malone got a 13 year old girl pregnant and was still allowed to play in the NBA. He was even allowed to judge an NBA dunk contest.
Jaden Ivey shares his Christian beliefs and he is blackballed from the NBA.
See the issue?
English
@DeePopTheKing @TheHistoryOfTh2 Is reading a struggle for you? That section is referring to diplomats and their families. See that pesky ",who are" section that clarifies it?
English
I believe I am almost alone in holding the following two opinions:
1. 14/A is clear, if you're born here and your parents weren't diplomats or in an occupying army, you are a citizen.
2. In today's world, it is unfortunate the birthright provision was written so expansively.
English
@realBrandonGill and when Madison wrote 2A his intent wasn't to give every idiot an AR-15 with a 30 round clip and a bump stock.
English
Something tells me that when Senator Jacob Howard wrote 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' in the 14th amendment, his intention wasn't that pregnant Guatemalans could cross into Texas, give birth, and have a child with the same rights as you and I.
English
Zero European countries currently grant fully automatic (unconditional/unrestricted) birthright citizenship.
Why are we the exception?
English
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…”
- Jacob Howard (1866)
Rep. Mark Harris@RepMarkHarrisNC
FACT: Birthright citizenship does not come from federal law or the Constitution, but a faulty interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
English
@The_Scourgelord @BravoKiloActual Nope. He's describing one group. That is why the word ", who" is used to clarify it. Notice it doesn't include the word OR. You're inferring the word OR should be in it but it's not.
English
@Im_spatial @BravoKiloActual Foreigner and diplomats already cover that. He is not being redundant he is listing different groups that are not citizens which is why Indians are also mentioned but you ignore.
English
The second amendment is literally a single sentence. And it has been endlessly tweaked and modified and had all kinds of restrictions placed upon it… yet we are forced to tolerate Chinese and Russian communists sending mothers here to have a U.S. citizen child?
Why???
Leading Report@LeadingReport
BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Amy Coney Barrett now seems skeptical of striking down birthright citizenship for illegal migrants. “What if you don’t know who the parents are?”
English
@MrSausageGet It would change nothing. It'd be the same interpretation of 14A that we have always had.
English
@The_Scourgelord @BravoKiloActual "an Alien is illegally present" This is completely false. That's not what it means. It means non-citizen.
English
@Im_spatial @BravoKiloActual I know the argument you are trying and its nonsense an Alien is illegally present. Diplomats have legal status they cannot by definition be considered Alien. The fact that all Indians were also not given legal status until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 further disproves it.
English
@The_Scourgelord @BravoKiloActual That ... is hiding the part that blows your silly argument out of the water.
English
@BravoKiloActual “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…”
- Jacob Howard (1866)
Howard wrote the jurisdiction part and was very fucking clear what he meant
English