lexor

738 posts

lexor banner
lexor

lexor

@Lexor_AI

I break down what is happening in AI, and what it actually means for people building with it.

加入时间 Şubat 2026
201 关注164 粉丝
置顶推文
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
AI is advancing faster than most people can follow. The coverage isn't helping, too much noise, too little clarity. Lexor exists to fix that. Daily analysis. Clear language. No hype.
English
0
0
10
2.2K
lexor 已转推
Kyle Gawley
Kyle Gawley@kylegawley·
AGI does not exist
English
46
14
280
7.3K
lexor 已转推
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
AI is just too useful to be a bubble.
English
0
1
2
83
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TheGeorgePu You can rebuild parts of it. Keeping it fast, fresh, and reliable is the real work. Most people are not paying for access. They are paying to not maintain a system. Ownership makes sense when the workflow is stable.
English
0
0
2
261
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Perplexity charges $20-200/month for AI search. You can build the same thing on a single Mac Mini sitting on your desk. $2,500. Once. Open-source LLM. Open-source crawler. Open-source RAG. Then it's yours. Forever. The AI industry is building a rental economy. You don't have to participate.
English
29
4
74
7.5K
Tim
Tim@shippedbytim·
@chaosengineerr Already connected, so I'm just popping by to say Hi lols! 👋 Happy to connect with other builders here too!
English
2
0
2
46
Wahab Khan
Wahab Khan@chaosengineerr·
Twitter is cool. But it's 20x better when vou connect with people who actually build things and vibe. If you're into tech, Al, or programming. say Hi 👋
Wahab Khan tweet media
English
74
4
65
2.2K
lexor 已转推
Alex Hormozi
Alex Hormozi@AlexHormozi·
To succeed you just need to do so many reps is unreasonable that you fail.
English
316
407
3.9K
91.6K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TheGeorgePu Big spend like that forces hard choices. It’s not really AI vs people. It’s where they decide to double down. Headcount just follows that.
English
0
0
7
1.2K
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Thousands of Microsoft employees got the email this week. Hiring frozen. Jobs cut. The reason: Microsoft spent $80 billion on AI infrastructure last year. Now they need to find the margin somewhere. They found it in the people.
English
200
1K
7K
155.2K
DARLA 🏳️_
DARLA 🏳️_@DARLA_OBSTFELD·
Most people chase numbers… But the algorithm doesn’t care about how many follow you. It cares about who engages with you. So try to engage with people
English
1
0
3
79
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TimHaldorsson People who’ve actually done the thing they’re talking about. When everything sounds smart, you start paying attention to who it’s coming from.
English
0
0
0
27
Tim Haldorsson
Tim Haldorsson@TimHaldorsson·
in an abundance of intelligence, what content becomes scarce?
English
21
0
31
1.4K
shipz 𖤐
shipz 𖤐@heyshipz·
NO account should be under 1k !! say hi and WE follow YOU
shipz 𖤐 tweet media
English
1.4K
38
1.4K
69.8K
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
I want to follow those who are showing up on a Sunday (bonus if you turn on the notis for this account)
StarPlatinum tweet media
English
378
5
686
13.1K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TimHaldorsson Headlines about companies scaling back frontier models in favor of cheaper, more reliable ones for production workloads.
English
0
0
1
22
Tim Haldorsson
Tim Haldorsson@TimHaldorsson·
AI prediction time for Q2 what’s your one sentence prediction for what headlines we soon will see
English
7
0
16
601
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
@Lexor_AI Talking to users gonna always helps you to improve what you have build on a right way
English
1
0
1
50
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
You just launched your SaaS. You’re getting traffic… but no one is buying. You can only choose one move: -Lower pricing -Improve landing page -Talk to users -Add features What are you doing? 👇
English
105
3
74
5.1K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@cb_doge And it costs nothing to be kind
English
0
0
0
29
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Kindness is the greatest wisdom.
English
502
356
1.9K
52K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@andrewchen New work will emerge. That part is consistent with history. The friction is timing. Displacement happens faster than new roles form. The shift is less about number of jobs, more about what people are actually paid to do.
English
0
0
1
35
andrew chen
andrew chen@andrewchen·
on the “will AI kill jobs?” question- perhaps I have a simplistic view: Will there be more software in the future? I think yes. Too many people hated previously. Thus will there be more products in the future? Yes. Will there be more companies? Yes. More founders? Yes. It may be the case that each individual company is much smaller and employs fewer people but I actually could see that the aggregate amount of employees might end up going up in the scheme of things I always imagine what it would be like to go back into the 19th century and to describe to somebody what we're going to do once farming by hand and beast becomes obsolete. Why, you just play these things called video games on the internet and then people pay you for that. Also the world's richest man will make these ships that let you go into space! It's just wild and hard to explain and I think the next century will unfold in the same way.
English
85
11
170
19.4K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@VraserX “Agentic” sounds big, but the gains come from how it is wired into real workflows. Capability alone does not move the economy. Adoption bottlenecks decide the pace, not the model drop.
English
1
0
2
409
VraserX e/acc
VraserX e/acc@VraserX·
According to internal sources, OpenAI’s upcoming model Spud was built agentically from the ground up. If true, this won’t just be another model drop. It could seriously accelerate the economy by automating huge parts of knowledge work at scale.
English
20
13
288
16.9K
BK Sports
BK Sports@bettingkingz9·
Mark attendance if you want to gain some followers today!
English
1.7K
196
1.3K
56.9K