The view from Malton

@Keir_Starmer WHAT?? DID YOU MISS THE ATTACKS BY MUSLIMS ON WHITE BOYS THIS WEEK?? YOU FUCKING HENIOUS BASTARDS.. x.com/i/status/20668…

@Keir_Starmer You’re incredibly quiet when it’s the other way round. Say his name Wayne Broadhurst. Murdered by an illegal Afghan Muslim.

@JohnCleese @JohnBent11 No. In no way imaginable.

Does this decision in any way benefit the British people whose interest should be the first concern of the British government

@AntiLeftMemes The Lumberjack Song.

What is the first thing you think of ?

The United Kingdom was built by the working of the working class, the management of the middle class, the leadership of the ruling class and the genius of the entrepreneurs and genuine intellectuals. It was not “built on immigration”.

A senior Ayatollah in Iran just issued a new Islamic ruling: Behead anyone who dares say they’re not a Muslim. “We will kill you, and we will kill you good.” This is the Islam regime. This is the Islam doctrine. The death cult must be exposed — and defeated. Enough.

@DeborahMeaden “Fantastic”? Hmm.

Absolutely. He has been a fantastic Mayor for Manchester but PM? That’s very different…

… which he won’t do.

“America will be a Muslim Country” “Russia will be a Muslim Country” Imam: “The future is ours. Every nightmare of a Muslim Europe will come through… Islam will enter every house”.” They have openly declared war on us. Why don’t we listen to them??

“We have taken the steps to ban your children from watching YouTube but if you would like to sign up for them to be chemically castrated, go right ahead.”

@Yam_Nivek The guilty are those who rejected the democratic decision and tried to thwart the entire process - having enthusiastically voted to hold the referendum in the first place.

Brexit has been a disaster – it’s time the guilty men felt some shame | The Independent independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-…

The European Union spends roughly 55 billion euros every year teaching French farmers to grow food nobody asked for at prices nobody would pay. That is the Common Agricultural Policy. It eats about a third of the entire EU budget, and it has done so, in one form or another, since 1962. You are paying for it whether you eat baguettes or not. Here is how the machine works. Brussels guarantees prices above the market, so farmers in Beauce and Picardy plant more wheat, sugar beet, and dairy than Europeans can consume. The surplus piles up. The infamous butter mountains and wine lakes of the 1980s were not jokes: they were warehouses full of products created by decree against the wishes of every actual buyer. So the EU dumps the excess abroad, subsidized again on the way out, undercutting farmers in Senegal, Ghana, and Kenya who never received a centime from Paris. A farmer in Burkina Faso wakes up to find European tomato paste and frozen chicken selling cheaper in his own village market than what he can produce from his own soil. He cannot compete with a treasury. No one can. He abandons the land, moves to the city, and joins the queue for the next development grant funded by the same governments that wrecked his livelihood. The aid budget cleans up after the agriculture budget. Magnificent. This is Bastiat's broken window with a passport. You see the tidy French countryside, the photogenic vineyards, the minister cutting a ribbon. You do not see the African farms that never expanded, the trade that never happened, the capital that fled to Lagos slums instead of staying productive on a farm. The seen subsidy buys votes in Rouen. The unseen cost lands on people who cannot vote in any European election and have no lobbyist in Brussels. Free market economists have explained the principle for over a century: every price control creates a surplus or a shortage, and every subsidy transfers wealth from the unseen many to the organized few. The CAP executes this mechanism with a French accent and a humanitarian press release. They call it solidarity, but to the Senegalese tomato grower, it is a competition he was forbidden to win.

@RichardGCorbett Nonsense: Absurd Net-zero policies. Welfare paying and costing more than work. Highest tax rates and take in living memory. Increasing unemployment. Increasing NEET youth. 2-tier justice. No viable Defence policy or spending plan. Europe is a distracting self-indulging sideshow.

Biggest issue facing Burnham, Starmer, Streeting or whoever leads Labour. The drain on Britain’s economy, and therefore its public finances, from being outside the EU holds us back from delivering on so many fronts.

The mainstream media and scientific bodies chose to ignore a climate declaration, signed by over 1,100 (and later, even more) scientists. The 'World Climate Declaration' was published in September, 2019, by CLINTEL (Climate Intelligence), a Netherlands-based group. It argued there is no climate crisis or emergency and criticised overreliance on worst-case scenarios based on computer modelling. The declaration pointed to empirical data of biomass expansion, noting that 'CO2 is plant food'—a reality now backed by verified NASA satellite data showing significant global greening over recent decades. They emphasised the biological benefits of CO2 for global greening, and argued that climate policies must respect economic realities and national sovereignty. However, critics of this paper were more focussed on who signed it, saying only a small percentage were publishing climate scientists or paleoclimatologists. Many were engineers, geologists, or professionals from unrelated fields. This was a collision between an entrenched, centrally coordinated climate machine and a bloc of independent professionals, drawn from engineering, economic and industrial backgrounds, arguing the practical, physical constraints and costs of such an all-encompassing global energy transition. The declaration said climate models had serious flaws. But the climate campaigners were on a roll, and said they alone represented mainstream science. They had built a body of evidence on the calibrated data of satellite and ocean temperatures. The 'short-term pain of transitioning to net zero was preferable to the long-term instability and economic damage from uncontrolled climate change. This posture allowed them to freely portray the 'rate of warming' as unprecedented in modern human history. The mainstream media backed them. The declaration was labeled 'fringe' overnight by major academic journals. The economic fallout from dismantling the global energy infrastructure has in fact been colossal, now estimated at $275 trillion and counting. The 1,100 strong declaration did not break through into this entrenched policy circle because of its institutional barriers to outsiders. These doors were permanently closed. The UN, major central banks and Western governments were already colluding clandestinely with each other, plus global asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard. They owned the science. They owned the carbon cash fallout. Now they owned the sovereignty as well. The climate narrative is high-stakes rhetoric, slick propaganda that downplays the gradual collapse of western economies, once based on cheap coal, oil and gas. This mainstream narrative is what captured the public's attention with its high-stakes rhetoric, bypassing the need for a professionally structured, data-driven approach that would be much harder for independent critics to dismiss. The campaign was spearheaded by claims of 'global boiling' - 'code red for humanity' rhetoric filled the news pages and dominated politicised shouting matches. The UN and associated bodies shifted their position from 'advisory' scientific panels to becoming the world's global economic managers. The conversation wasn't about atmospheric physics. It was about rusted-on, centralised, top-down control and ownership. But when policies move faster than engineering realities, like grid stability and battery storage limits, then economic hardship becomesss the inevitable price. That is exactly how it has turned out.

The Post Office IT scandal is one of the most devastating miscarriages of justice in British history. It is right that Fujitsu - the company that designed the system that decimated the postmasters' lives - contributes to the compensation bill for victims. Victims must quickly get the compensation and redress they deserve. They have already waited far too long. theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/j…

A welcoming present just out this morning for a Mr A Burnham to underline just how limited his latitude as PM will be: The UK government borrowed £23.3 billion last month, 30 per cent or £5.4 billion higher than a year earlier. It was also more than the £18.8 billion expected by most economists and the £17.7 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility, the UK’s independent fiscal watchdog.  The interest payable on government debt rose to £11.7 billion, the highest ever recorded in any May.

Let me see if I’ve got this right… An 11-year-old girl can’t legally drink alcohol, get a tattoo, have sex, watch a PG-rated film without parental consent, or even create many social media accounts. But she CAN consent to take part in a clinical experiment involving life changing drugs that could permanently affect her physical development and reproductive organs. How does that make sense?

Watch this. Brigitte Gabriel exposes the harsh truth: The Palestinians became victims of their own choices. They chose terror and Jihad over peace and prosperity. Israel left Gaza completely in 2005 — for the sake of peace. Instead of building a thriving Singapore of the Middle East, the Palestinian Muslims turned it into a barbaric Islamic terrorist state dedicated to destroying Israel and murdering Jews. This isn’t about “occupation.” It’s about a genocidal Islamic ideology that prefers death and destruction over life and civilization

Stoke rioter Mohammed Iqbal threw bricks at English Southport protestors, boasting on social media of his involvement and posted photo of a wounded victim - but dodges jail for violent disorder convictions as he is a father of 7 children. The English were fast tracked through the courts and straight to prison, and they had good reason to be angry.

Just saying …. 🚨 No other country on earth does this - Except us! If a UK citizen moves abroad with no job, no contributions, no private income, what happens? 🇫🇷 France – no welfare until you’ve lived and paid in for years 🇩🇪 Germany – no benefits without work or residency 🇪🇸 Spain you don’t have money to support yourself? No entry 🇺🇸 USA – no free housing, no cash, no healthcare unless you buy it 🇨🇦 Canada – prove you can support yourself or you’re deported 🇦🇺 Australia – welfare only after years of residency 🇳🇿 New Zealand – same, no contributions = no benefits 🇸🇦 Saudi & Gulf States – if you’re not a citizen, you get nothing, ever 🇨🇾 Cyprus – no benefits without long-term residency and contributions 🇮🇹 Italy – strict means-testing and years of contributions required 🇵🇱 Poland – no welfare for new arrivals without work history 🇯🇵 Japan – extremely strict, foreigners rarely qualify for public assistance 🇰🇷 South Korea – residency and contribution requirements, very limited access 🇸🇬 Singapore – no welfare state for non-citizens, work or leave 🇮🇱 Israel – benefits tied to military service or long-term residency for most ❌ Bottom line: there is no country that lets Brits just turn up and live off their welfare system. None. ✅ But Britain does the opposite: • Free housing • Weekly cash payments • Healthcare • Legal aid • Schooling • Free driving & Tennis lessons • Free English lessons • Free trips out (Zoo, Theme Parks, etc) All available immediately. No work. No contributions. Our pensioners choose between heating and eating. Our veterans sleep rough. Our families are crushed by tax while services collapse. Yet billions are handed instantly to strangers who have given nothing. This is not fairness. This is not compassion. This is national self-sabotage. If you want to understand why Britain feels invaded while our people struggle, start here 👇 🔹 Hotels full while veterans sleep on the streets 🔹 Families waiting years for housing while arrivals are housed immediately 🔹 NHS queues for British citizens while newcomers get seen on day one 🔹 Taxpayers bled dry while billions are spent on people who never paid a penny in 🔹 Undocumented fighting-age males sheltered without vetting or background checks 🔹 Sharp rise in sexual crimes, rapes and grooming gangs ignored by authorities 🔹 Violent crime increasing while police look the other way to stay “politically correct” Britain is now a country that abandons the requirements of its own citizens in order to facilitate invading illegal migrants that have zero interest in our societal cohesion. In every other country, newcomers must contribute first. Here, the indigenous people are sacrificed for the system. This isn’t immigration policy. It’s betrayal. It’s a full on traitorous attack on the British society, our sovereignty and standards of living. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH