Masked Man

In Islam, the Arab race is superior to ajam (non Arab). This is the opinion of the grand mufti of Saudi Arabia Sheikh Saleh Fauzan. As well as Ibn Taimiyya (he cites Sahih Muslim 2276 as evidence) youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

@RealAramya I think you forgot this classic clip of the meth head doctor

Dr. Hotha stands on principle, knowledge, and integrity, qualities that speak for themselves. Mohammad Hijab, on the other hand, is first and foremost a performer. Like a touring circus, he thrives on spectacle, shouting, grandstanding, and stirring chaos purely to draw eyeballs and feed his ego. That’s his brand, and he’s good at it. But it’s nothing new. To all those throwing baseless attacks at Dr. Hotha with zero foundation, have some ikrah. A real man doesn’t slander with empty noise. Dr. Hotha brings substance. Hijab brings the show. I stand with Dr. Hotha. Facts over theatrics. #StandWithHotha @HothaAli

Arab Supremacist Hotha Ali Gets STUNNED By A Simple Question

Here is the heirarchy of arabs (and arabs plainly openly say this too). Gulf arabs are top, then it's the leventine, then it's the Africans. And as for ajam, well they are all ethnicly inferior to us anyway. Don't believe me? Mufti of mekkah Saleh fauzan: youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

Wahabi arabs feel the need to attack Turks/Persians all the time because they know that the ummah is willing/would follow the leadership of Turks & Persians over wahabis if the chance came. Turks & Persians have carved out a glorious name for themselves 4ever in Islamic history

@Milat_at_Tawhid Either he is paid by the Gulf arabs, or genuinely naive. Is he is naive and sincere, in time, he will come to know what salafi wahabis truly represent (Arab supremacy, nationalism, and enslavement of ajam), I mean their sheiks openly preach it youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

New Reverts to Salafism are so jarring man

wahabi arabs assisting the British against the Muslim caliphate and openly slaughtering innocent Muslims through takfir, meanwhile:

@Goatedko Meanwhile, here's they renouned mufti of mekkah, Saleh fauzan; publicly and proudly giving fatwa of the Arab race being superior to non arabs...and wahabis defend this...youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

SNEAKO agreed with Mohammed Hijab that Muslims should spend less time debating Christians and focus more on using their knowledge to bring UNITY between the Muslims. ☪️🤝 "He is right, there are many people trying to divide us"

Pro-Israel accounts Vs Pro-Islam accounts

No lies detected

@SunniSectarian @koreanimam And just cause you aren't Arab doesn't mean I won't call out your bs when you spread it. Arabs are the problem within the ummah, specifically the Gulf wahabis. Arabs literal dogs of Zionist cause they are arrogant and ignorant and hypocritical. What happened no racism in Islam?

@MaskedMan_HD @koreanimam You’re quite ignorant, classical scholars say the same thing. Arabs as a race are superior in terms of lineage, religion, etc, however this is general. Individually the better one is in terms of taqwa. Also you cannot call me an Arab supremacist as I’m not even Arab.

No one should justify insulting Mohammed Hijab because of his Egyptian background or skin color. Calling him a slave, a Black man, or a Copt as terms of contempt is racism and forbidden tribalism. Whoever used such insults was wrong. But it is also wrong to turn the entire dispute into a story about “Arab racism,” as though everyone who objected to his words did so because he is Egyptian. I am a Korean Muslim, neither Arab nor Saudi, yet his words about Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his da‘wah also angered me. Is my anger also Arab racism? Insulting the Shaykh, distorting his da‘wah, and using “Wahhabism” as a negative and provocative label is not an issue concerning Saudis alone. Muslims around the world, including Korean Muslims like me, have benefited from his books and his call to tawhid. Some people did use racist insults against Mohammed Hijab, and they are responsible for their words. But many others criticized him because of what he said, his use of vague and emotionally charged terms, and his way of placing Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the Najdi da‘wah, scholars, Salafis, and Saudis within one negative framework. He says he was only criticizing “extremism in takfir within the Najdi da‘wah between 1744 and 1969.” Such a broad claim requires precise evidence. Which book is he criticizing? Which text does he object to? Which scholar made the statement? What evidence justifies describing more than two centuries as a period of “extremism in takfir”? Focusing on the worst racist comments made by some individuals does not answer these questions or remove his responsibility for his own words. It is also unreasonable to move from offensive social media comments to sweeping conclusions about Arabs, the Muslim world, Palestine, and the decline of the Ummah. Such enormous claims cannot be proven by a collection of abusive comments. We reject racism against him, but we also reject using racism to divert attention from the original dispute. The fact that some opponents wronged him does not make his statements correct. The fact that some insulted his background does not make everyone who criticized him racist. The fact that he was abused does not exempt him from presenting evidence or correcting his own generalizations. I am a Korean Muslim, yet I also feel offended when someone mocks Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab or distorts his da‘wah. This proves that the issue is not a conflict between Egyptians and Saudis, nor between North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. For many Muslims, it is about defending a scholar through whose books they learned tawhid and a da‘wah calling people to worship Allah alone and oppose shirk and religious innovations. Two matters must therefore be distinguished: The racism he experienced, which is forbidden. And the objections to his statements and method, which do not disappear because of the misconduct of some people. Justice means condemning those who insulted him because of his origin while also requiring him to provide evidence and speak fairly and precisely about Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his da‘wah. Allah says: “O you who believe, stand firmly for Allah as witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people cause you to be unjust. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness.” Surah al-Ma’idah 5:8

@SunniSectarian @koreanimam Bro snitched on himself, just cause a classical scholars even say arabs are superior doesn't mean they r right. This smells of Jewish chosen people vibes. Big be open, and tell all your fellow ajam how the Arabs are ethnicly superior

@KoreanMuslimTV Quit deflecting, Muhammad hijab pointed out a real issue in the Arab community. Arabs believe they are ethnicly superior to other races and you can see it their arrogance, ignorance. Why else does their scholar Fauzan publicly declare Arab race supremacy: youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

A Korean Muslim’s Open Challenge to Mohammed Hijab — Day 1 Mohammed Hijab, Do not use the racist statements made against you by some Saudis as an excuse to obscure the central issue or avoid answering the religious and historical claims that you yourself initiated. I will continue raising this matter until you provide a scholarly answer or publicly apologize for insulting Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon him, and his da‘wah. Respecting Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and defending his honor is not a matter that concerns Saudis alone. The mocking and insulting language you used against the Shaykh and his da‘wah was also deeply offensive to me, even though I am not Saudi. I am a Korean Muslim. Will you now avoid answering me as well by claiming that a Korean Muslim is being racist toward you? Just as you publicly initiated a dispute concerning “Wahhabism” and the Najdi da‘wah, I now publicly challenge you as a Korean Muslim. Present the alleged religious and scholarly errors of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab using his exact words and clear evidence. You discussed Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his da‘wah under the negative and mocking label of “Wahhabism.” In doing so, you also turned countless students of knowledge and Muslims who study his books, benefit from his teachings, and seek to practice tawhid and the Sunnah into targets of mockery and condemnation. The label “Wahhabi” is itself inaccurate. The Shaykh’s name was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, meaning Muhammad, the son of Abd al-Wahhab. Al-Wahhab is one of the beautiful names of Allah and was not the Shaykh’s own name. Yet the label “Wahhabi” was artificially derived from his father’s name, Abd al-Wahhab, and has been used as a derogatory label against the Shaykh and his da‘wah. Therefore, you did not insult the Shaykh alone. You also made countless Muslims throughout the world into targets of ridicule—Muslims who study his books, learned tawhid through his da‘wah, and seek to follow the Qur’an and Sunnah according to the understanding of the early righteous generations. This was not merely a criticism of one historical movement or academic opinion. It damaged the Shaykh’s honor and scholarly legacy and offended countless Muslims who learned tawhid through his books. So answer precisely: Which book of the Shaykh are you criticizing? Which exact statement do you consider wrong? Which aspect of his creed contradicts the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah? Which scholar made an unjust declaration of takfir against whom? What are the exact text, book title, page number, author, and historical context? You said that some people racially insulted you because of your Egyptian background and skin color. Such racism is clearly wrong and forbidden. We firmly reject anyone insulting you because of your origin or skin color. However, the racist reactions of some people do not justify what you said about Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his da‘wah. You claimed that Saudis could not offer a proper argument and responded only with racism, and you announced that you were writing your final statement on the matter. But before changing the focus of the dispute to racism, you must first examine your own use of the vague and mocking term “Wahhabism.” You must also take responsibility for the insult caused by that label to Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, his da‘wah, and the countless students of knowledge and Muslims who learned tawhid through his books. Insulting Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab is not an issue that concerns Saudis alone. I am a Korean Muslim, neither Arab nor Saudi. Yet when someone mocks the Shaykh or distorts his da‘wah, I also feel angry and insulted. Many Muslims around the world, including Korean Muslims like me, learned tawhid, the meaning of “There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah,” and how to guard against shirk and religious innovations through his books. Therefore, this issue must not be reduced to Saudi nationalism or Arab ethnic sentiment. I require one of two things from you. First, repent and publicly apologize for using the mocking and negative label “Wahhabism” to insult Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, his da‘wah, and the students of knowledge and Muslims who study his books and follow his teachings. Second, if you cannot apologize, accept my public challenge. Publicly demonstrate the religious and scholarly errors of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab using his original words, reliable historical sources, and evidence from the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah. General claims and emotional statements are not answers. “Read history” is not an answer. Claiming that his father and brother opposed him is not sufficient. Claiming that many scholars of his time opposed him is also not scholarly evidence without exact books, original texts, authors, and sources. What we require is clear: The title of the book. The exact original text. The page number. The author. The historical context in which the statement was written. And a clear demonstration that it contradicts the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah. If you truly intend to expose errors in Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and the Najdi da‘wah, there is no reason for you to avoid this challenge. But if you mock them using the label “Wahhabism” without presenting specific evidence, and then attempt to end the discussion by pointing to racist comments made by some people, this cannot be considered a scholarly approach. If some people made racist remarks against you, they are responsible for their words. But you are also responsible for what you said about Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his da‘wah. The wrongdoing of others does not remove your own responsibility. Experiencing racism cannot replace evidence for religious and historical claims. Therefore, I publicly demand once again: Repent and publicly apologize, or accept this challenge. Prove the alleged religious and scholarly errors of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab using exact original texts and scholarly evidence. As a Korean Muslim, I await a public response based not on emotional ethnic disputes, but on the Qur’an, the authentic Sunnah, exact original texts, and scholarly evidence. - Abdullah Park al-Kuri @KoreanMuslimTV @KoreanMuslimTV" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@KoreanMuslimTV

@HothaAli I mean is it not funny? 🤣 Rabbi Fauzan tbh deserves a public expose, for instance let me play you a classic from this 'scholar,' that's right, Rabbi Fauzan believes the Arab race is ethnicly superior to all others: youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

Hijab insulting the respected Scholar and Sheikh ibn fawzan then absolutely denying it.

🧵⚠️This is Abdurahman Bin Nooh, known on X as Hotha @HothaAli. He lived in NYC for years & No, he’s NOT a DOCTOR, He’s a simple RESIDENT Physician at SHF in Saudi Arabia. This Saudi Nationalist has multiple accounts all listed below & run his filth through them. A THREAD 🧵

Dr. Hotha is a filthy scum, he has destroyed the name of Saudi Arabia with his filthy mouth and racism. Here is what he said; “You should suck my d**k, f**k you and f**k your mother, I p**s on your mother. And listen, all your women are b****es, you know that? All your Palestinian women are b****es, we f**k them in Saudi Arabia. They love that in Saudi Arabia.” Palestinian women are honorable pious Muslims who raised a nation of Mujahideen that has fought the worst enemies of Islam for decades. May Allah (swt) elevate their rank, and give them what is best in this life, and in the Akhira.

@mohammed_hijab Here is also Arab Rabbi Saleh fauzan publicly e declaring ethnic Arab race supremacy: youtube.com/watch?v=sZmEfw…

هذه كلمتي الأخيرة في شأن عنصرية العرب في الوقت الراهن فاسمعوها. ما خطر لي يوما أن يعير المرء بأصله ولونه في عقر دار العروبة. فمنذ أيام والسباب ينهال علي من عرب لا لجرم إلا أني مصري الأصل والمنبت. فنبزت بالعبد والزنجي والقبطي وبأخبث من ذلك مما يأنف اللسان عن حكايته. ولست أرمي العرب جميعا بهذه الوصمة فحاشا أن أقابل ظلما بظلم. فكم من عربي شريف نبيل وقف معي ووقف في وجه هذا السفه وأنكره بلسانه وقلبه. فلهؤلاء مني كل تحية وإجلال. وإنما كلامي على الراشقين وعلى من سكت عنهم. وما بدأت قوما بعدوان ولا رميت أحدا بعرقه. وكل الذي كان مني نقد لغلو التكفير في الدعوة النجدية فيما بين عامي 1744 و1969 لا أزيد. ولن أكتم أن خيبتي فوق كل ما يتصور. غير أني أقر أني كنت على سذاجة طول الطريق. فقد حسبت أن غلاة اليمين في بريطانيا أشد أهل الأرض عنصرية لما يتصاعد من نفس البغض للمهاجرين. فإذا ظني باطل وحسباني هباء. فتأملوا عربا يرمون إخوة لهم من شمال أفريقيا بهذا السباب وهم في الدم والأصل سواء. فماذا عساهم صانعون بمن سواهم من الأمم. أوليس من الخزي أنهم لا يجرؤون على عنصرية تجاه الرجل الأبيض. ذاك الذي يرفعونه فوق رؤوسهم وقد استعمرت له عقولهم واستعبدت. بل الخزي الأكبر أن طلاب العلم وعلماء تلك الديار وقد كانوا بالأمس ملء المجالس في دقائق التاريخ ونوادره قد ضنوا بالإنكار على هذا الغلو القومي والعنصري إلا نزرا يسيرا. وهذا يصادم قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لا فضل لعربي على عجمي ولا لعجمي على عربي ولا لأحمر على أسود ولا لأسود على أحمر إلا بالتقوى. ويصادم قول الله تعالى يا أيها الناس إنا خلقناكم من ذكر وأنثى وجعلناكم شعوبا وقبائل لتعارفوا إن أكرمكم عند الله أتقاكم. فجعل الميزان التقوى لا اللون ولا النسب. وقد برئ النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم من العصبية فقال ليس منا من دعا إلى عصبية. وقال في الجاهلية تنبعث دعوها فإنها منتنة. وصدق القائل. الناس من جهة التمثال أكفاء أبوهم آدم والأم حواء. فإن يكن لهم في أصلهم شرف يفاخرون به فالطين والماء. ما الفخر إلا لأهل العلم إنهم على الهدى لمن استهدى أدلاء. أفصارت الخطب والدروس وقفا على هوامش الأمور دون لبابها. وعما ينخر في عظم الأمة فيورثها التخلف والشتات. وقد قال ربنا واعتصموا بحبل الله جميعا ولا تفرقوا. فعصينا أمره فتفرقنا أحزابا وشيعا. اليوم أدركت لم تأخرنا أمة ولم تفرقنا شعوبا. وأدركت معه سرا طالما حيرني. فقد قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم مثل المؤمنين في توادهم وتراحمهم وتعاطفهم كمثل الجسد الواحد إذا اشتكى منه عضو تداعى له سائر الجسد بالسهر والحمى. فأنى لجسد نخره داء العصبية أن يحس بعضو ينزف في فلسطين. وهذا يفسر ما نراه من فتور وبرود تجاه قضية فلسطين في كثير من العالم الإسلامي. إذ كيف يرحم البعيد من لا يرحم القريب الذي يشبهه في الدم واللون. وإنما المؤمنون إخوة فمن قطع أخاه للونه فقد قطع حبل الأخوة كله. وستبقى هذه الواقعة عبرة يتدارسها العالمون ليعلموا في أي درك من التخلف ما نزال نتردى في العالم الإسلامي. فهذه كلمتي في هذا الأمر إلى حين. فأما الأحرار الكرام منكم فأخوة لي ما حييت. وأما العنصريون ومن لاذ بالصمت رضا بفعلهم فقد فرغت منهم وطويت صفحتهم ونفضت يدي منهم فلا عودة. والسلام على من اتبع الهدى.

@anawwqo @jil472305786571 @redstar1234245 No one is building a mansion with that money my guy. At best it's like 4 people working themselves to death to build a normal house over decades, and they try to save on every occasion like skipping meals etc to maximize how much they send. Stop coping, they don't get payed much

@MaskedMan_HD @jil472305786571 @redstar1234245 Who told you their salaries were low? Go and look at the houses and mansions they built in their home countries with this money.

Can't believe I'm actually siding with Mo Hijab on this one

@ImamSecular ICONIC MH MOMEMT 😂

This is gold 😂😂😂

If you aren't Arab and consider yourself a salafi, you have no shame or self respect. The current salafi movement is undoubtedly in support of aram supremacy, Arab nationalism & complete loyalty to the Gulf rulers. They consider ajam (non arabs) as ethnicly inferior. Shame on u