PossibleBest

@codechad @PM_ViktorOrban Glad we can share views. Those are fair points . But the real question is at what cost and for how long? If the conflict is still ongoing and escalation risks remain, can we really call it a solution, or just containment?

@PossibleBest @PM_ViktorOrban It improved situation by 1) preventing russia’s warmachine going beyond Ukraine 2) diversifying EUs energy security 3) reviving alliances and defense effort Not ideal on all 3 fronts, lots of room for improvement, and complications from the (temporarily) insane allies, but

Europe is heading toward one of the most severe economic crises in its history. The world is facing a serious energy crisis. Europe is in grave danger. The only way out is to lift the sanctions imposed on Russian energy. Immediately. We must think not about Putin, but about our own country and our peoples. Instead of warmongering, love and save your country, Donald!

@dzejdzi3 @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban I’m not asking for a Google summary . I’m asking for your argument. Do you believe the current approach is actually resolving the situation, or just comparing economies?

@PossibleBest @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban Are you expecting me to write you the differences between the economic growth summary in Poland vs Hungary? Use google - it’s gonna be faster.

@dzejdzi3 @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban That’s not an answer , that’s a deflection.

@PossibleBest @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban Well, we are doing quite well in Poland. Thanks for asking.

@dzejdzi3 @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban If the alternative approach is working so well, where are the results people can actually feel?

@PossibleBest @codechad @PM_ViktorOrban Orban’s approach is „working”? Hungary is the poorest country in UE, alienated, considered as traitor. God forbid such a leader 🤦🏻‍♀️

@codechad @PM_ViktorOrban When the argument runs out, insults take over. If it’s really that simple, explain how the current approach has improved the situation instead of just labeling everything “appeasement.”

@PossibleBest @PM_ViktorOrban Bro, Orban is already past appeasement phase, he is full on motorboarding putin’s anus.

@CasperBP @PM_ViktorOrban That analogy doesn’t hold. Helping someone in the street is immediate and direct , this is about long-term policies affecting millions of people and entire economies. Leadership isn’t a split-second reaction, it’s weighing consequences.

@PossibleBest @PM_ViktorOrban So if a person gets attacked in the street and you have the possibility to help at the risk of getting hurt… would you do it?

@CasperBP @PM_ViktorOrban If policies are hurting your own people, is continuing them really “strong leadership”?

@PossibleBest @PM_ViktorOrban He is choosing to take it up the ass instead of fighting back… that’s not leadership that’s being a pussy!

@codechad @PM_ViktorOrban Calling everything appeasement doesn’t make it strategy. Sometimes the real question is whether your current approach is actually working.

@PossibleBest @PM_ViktorOrban Thats not what leadership looks like lmao. You’d be the one to vote for Chamberlain I bet

Calling NATO “successful” doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be questioned. Trump’s point is simple

The U.S. should seriously rethink its role in NATO not out of isolation, but out of long-term strategy. NATO was created for a specific era, with a clear enemy and a defined purpose. That world no longer exists in the same way, yet the structure remains expanding, adapting, and in many cases, pulling the U.S. deeper into tensions that are not directly tied to its core national interests. • It keeps the U.S. at the center of conflicts that begin outside its borders • It encourages some members to rely heavily on American military backing rather than building their own capacity • Its expansion and positioning often heighten geopolitical tensions instead of easing them • It commits U.S. resources, financial, military, and strategic far beyond what is proportionate • It creates a system where involvement becomes expected, even when restraint might be the better option At a certain point, an alliance that is supposed to ensure stability can begin to perpetuate cycles of confrontation and not necessarily by intention, but by structure. That doesn’t automatically make it “warmongering” in a simple sense, but it does raise a serious question: Is NATO still a defensive alliance in practice, or has it become a mechanism that keeps major powers constantly positioned for conflict? Reassessing that isn’t abandoning allies , it’s recognizing that global dynamics have changed. The real issue isn’t loyalty, it’s alignment. If an alliance no longer aligns clearly with your long-term interests, continuing it without question isn’t strength.. it’s inertia.

VOTE NOW: Should America Withdraw From NATO? hannity.com/media-room/cas…

@mikepompeo If an alliance is designed to advance one country’s interests first, can it really be called collective?

NATO has been a key instrument in securing America's superpower status. We have every right to insist that our NATO allies pull their weight, but should always remember the principal reason we've invested so heavily in the alliance to begin with: advancing our own interests.

Not everything Europe struggles with is “Putin’s plan.” Internal divisions, energy policy choices, and political disagreements didn’t start in Moscow, they started within Europe itself.

@donaldtusk Not everything Europe struggles with is “Putin’s plan.” Internal divisions, energy policy choices, and political disagreements didn’t start in Moscow , They started within Europe itself.

The threat of NATO’s break-up, easing sanctions on Russia, a massive energy crisis in Europe, halting aid for Ukraine and blocking the loan for Kyiv by Orbán - it all looks like Putin’s dream plan.

How do you manage interactions with someone more intellectually advanced than you?

Signs of a low IQ:

You’re free to practice your beliefs, but my dog isn’t something I discard to prove respect.

@Pixie1z My dog isn’t disrespecting your religion , it’s just living its life. Respect shouldn’t mean removing what’s part of my home.

What is your reply?

Saying “this is not our war” is understandable , No country wants direct involvement. Calling for de-escalation also makes sense diplomatically. But at the same time, talking about energy routes like the Strait of Hormuz, cost-of-living impacts, and working with EU partners shows how connected the situation already is. Preparing for economic and security consequences while staying out militarily reflects the reality of modern conflicts , involvement isn’t always on the battlefield. It raises a fair question: Can any major economy truly stay “out” of a conflict when it’s already managing its ripple effects?

Watch my press conference live. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Stand By Me