Raymond Moore

If a woman wore one of those special anti r*pe barbed south african vaginal inserts this man would see her prosecuted and put in prison for mutilating some poor innocent man's penis. "She set a trap!"

@DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_

@pnbphilosophy @DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_ In this case in group is everyone who wouldn't hurt someone else just for a giggle and out group is well people who insist it's just a little bit of fun uwu

@DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_ Classifying this as “out-group” is weird. Plenty of vandals are members of the victim’s in-group. And consequences aren’t punishments. If you punch a wall and break your hand, that’s a consequence, not a punishment. Same here.

The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society. Goes like this: If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with... The aggressor because he got hurt? Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor? You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something. But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy. I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources. They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it. That is the sign of a rotten soul. Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself. I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody. We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.

Never, in the history of history itself, has a judge looked down at the prisoner in the dock and declared "I sentence you to Concrete Mailbox". Why not? Because Concrete Mailbox is not a punishment, you factory-defective lawn gnome. It's a mailbox. Made from concrete. If you hurt yourself with it because you can't be bothered to learn the laws of physics in your own damn universe, that is a you problem. I am not obligated to suffer harm in order to protect you from a stupid action you might someday take. Of course, what you are really doing is engaging in the favorite marxist pastime of "pretending not to understand things". What you are pretending not to understand is the difference between consequences and punishment. For example, if you are a lazy marxist, and you won't work or do anything for anyone else, you'll be broke. This is not a conspiracy to deprive you of stuff. It is simply the consequence of you being selfish. You know this. But you pretend not to because you hope that if you confuse the issue enough, you can get suggestible people to give you free stuff. And in this case, you want to protect vandals at the expense of people who own mailboxes, because you are more likely to vandalize a mailbox than to own one, therefore you fail the Mailbox Test by sympathizing with the vandal.

@AntonyOBeara @BlackDumpling I assume a lot of people would. Myself included

@BlackDumpling I would miss you.

I'm never leaving this app, but maybe I should, homey. Maybe I should.

WARN THE MORTALS: It starts with a YOU MEGA GALACTIC NEED TO READ THIS, most important thing on this site according to this super duper legit Serbian, and he'll show it to you immediately.. after you click through and get him that tasty tasty deliciously dripping engagement. Listen, you've only got so much time here, there, and everywhere... and these vampiric life thieves who hate you so deserve less, not more, of that time.

When you hit something with enough kinetic energy and that object doesn't give... well that energy has to go somewhere and most of it'll go right back at where it started. I'll let you imagine just how much energy is in a ton of car attached to an aluminum baseball bat hitting a concrete block doing fifty miles an hour. Baseball bat is shattered right along with the arms of the guy holding on to it. Not a mistake he'll make twice, that's for certain.

@NewJerusalemAI @Casual_Nerdist @DorneSylas @SCorundar @BlackDumpling @theblessedsalt Realistically irrelevant and if the law disagrees it should be changed. These people are nothing but a drain on society

@Casual_Nerdist @DorneSylas @SCorundar @BlackDumpling @theblessedsalt Bro the guy that created that mailbox admitted it was a boobytrap designed to hurt vandals. Thats what the entire conversation is about. you don't get to just go "nope I'm not arguing for that!"

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

No, at this point the actual conversation is about you my little lolcow, and I think everyone is aware of it except you. Such a perfect example of anti-masculinity.

No, the Sims for. men hasn't been invented yet. The Sims for Men would be Crusader Kings plus Bannerlord plus Skyrim. Every dude I've ever met would buy that game.

When we tell you the Left is a Death Cult it's easy to laugh it off as if it were hyperbole. Anyway, here's a woman saying she would be fine with being erased from existence if it meant her grandma had the option to kill off members of her own family when they were children.

Can anyone explain to me why running, or even just taking part in a dog fighting ring shouldn't rate capital punishment? There are certain crimes that require evil. Not just I got mad and had a bad day, or I looked left when I should've looked right. I mean like that guy that would collect dogs so that he could X them brutally so he could blow off steam after getting into an argument with his girlfriend. He's looking at ten but he'll probably get around five. Point being, five or ten, exactly how "redeemed" so you think he'll be? Does anything about the world improve by allowing him to remain in it? His was a perfectly evil act against perfectly innocent puppies. 12 of them if varying ages. He would find them, adopt them, and beat them to death because he was just so very angry. There are a bunch of crimes like this. Crimes that require actual legitimate evil that get a hand slap when they should rate death. We've all seen them. Some woman lets some dude rot in prison for an X crime she knows full well he didn't commit. Beating people senseless in nursing homes. I don't even mean X the elderlies, I mean just repeatedly punching them. Why shouldn't that rate capital punishment? No, seriously?

@BlackDumpling The adjective 'unarmed' is irrelevant. The important descriptor is 'intruder.' The fight didn't start when I pulled the trigger. It started when they crossed the threshold of my home unauthorized. It's not my fault they didn't prepare for the fight they started.

Should I be allowed to shoot unarmed intruders? Brother, I have a responsibility to.. And anyone who doesn't understand why is just useless. No, I will not be explaining myself, you need to sus this one out on your own kiddo, but the answer is there I assure you. ***

If you want to understand frustration with the new algo look no further. Imagine a post so popular half the people who see it like it, and in response the algo restricts it to only a hundred people. The signal it sends is that even if you produce good, interesting, clever content that people like... it still won't be shown to anyone.

Um sir, if I wanted to legally murder kids I wouldn't need to fill my mailbox with concrete, I'd just go work at an abortion clinic.

I hate malebitches. I especially hate this malebitch.

Or 3(4?). I don't want to deal with filling out a police report in the middle of the night after I shoot some Leftist who just tried to burn my house down. These people are so stupidly short sighted.

Well, no, the point I'm making is that when talking about your wife and your children and your relationship to them you decided you needed to insert in there that you like to get fucked by men. Now, to everyone else that's... icky. It's weird. It makes one question whether or not you should be allowed around anyone's children, even your own. And for good reason. Of course YOU don't see that, else you wouldn't have posted it, but other people do. Other people recognize the sickness within the thought process even if you don't.