Meshy

anyone else having problems where your client randomly desyncs in brazilian servers? like you can see others actions normally but your actions dont get sent to the server this post is also reporting the same issue, so read this if you didnt understand devforum.roblox.com/t/sao-paulo-ro…

🏔️INTERCITY🏔️ Here are 3 new leaks about Piggy: Intercity! 🐊 Tova will sell you useful tools. 🪖 A sergeant and his troops at a training camp. 📗New location revealed: a library (or what’s left of it).

Poe

Coerced consent cannot be withdrawn because it isn't real consent, consent is gained through trust and mutual bonding, not pressuring and manipulation Coerced consent is not real consent

(11/11) This is not and was never consent but just damage control. If you people want an actual document to read that is truthful. Wait for ren's new document to be released.

(10/?) In conclusion. Zeal's document is a classic example of an abuser trying to normalise, minimise, and blame the victim. He does not have a single message where ren says "yes, I want to have sex with you" He has messages of that AFTER the assault. Which. Still. Makes it. SA.

(9/?) some stuff that zeal's document does not address: - why he washed her body under the shower. (If it was consensual, why remove evidence?) - why he made the Google doc joke - why he never asked ren, after the fact, "did I hurt you? Are you ok?"

(8.3/?) that's not the behaviour of someone who thought everything was fine, it's the behaviour of someone who knew something was wrong.

(8.2/?) his focus is entirely on his own performance and shame, not on ren's well being. He left her under the shower after washing her body. He made a joke about a Google doc.

(8.1/?) he wrote: "I left in a hurry because I just wanted to be alone... I was embarrassed that I had touched a woman intimately for the first time, and that I didn't manage to satisfy ren properly."

(8/?) **HE ADMIIITTTSSS HE LEFT BECAUSE HE WAS EMBARRASSED. NOT BECAUSE SHE WAS HURT.**

(7.3/?) many survivors only understand they were assaulted after distance and therapy. Zeal is trying to lock ren into a "yes" she gave while trauma bonded.

(7.2/?) this is LEGALLY and ETHICALLY false. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, even during the act. And realising that your "yes" was given under coercion and fear doesn't even make it real consent.

(7.1/?) son. Do I need to even explain.

(7/?) **HE SAYS CONSENT GIVEN CANNOT BE RETRACTED 6 MONTHS LATER**

(6.2/?) ren explained she lied about fantasies. To protect his feelings and keep her from abandoning her. Zeal dismisses this as "retroactive" without engaging with the psychology.

(6.1/?) zeal presents her post-assault messages ("I fantasized about you", "I liked it") as proof of consent. But he never addresses the concept of fawning. It's a documented trauma response when survivors appease their abuser to survive.

(6/?) **HE IGNORES THE POWER IMBALANCE AND FAWNING.**

(5.2/?) but ren's document shows she was already in therapy and processing trauma before he cut contact. Her realization didn't happen overnight, it took months of medication and professional help. That's not revenge. It's called healing, dipshit.

(5.1/?) he said: "ren retroactively decided that our encounter constituted an assault once I had declined to continue our relationship weeks after RDC" This is a common tactic: accuse the survivor of lying because they're bitter about rejection.

(5/?) **HE CLAIMS THAT SHE "RETROACTIVELY DECIDED" IT WAS ASSAULT AFTER HE REJECTED HER.**