@LegalOpsHezzle For us it’s just plain Word but with the advanced system of styles and template elements we created over the years
English
Contract.one
326 posts
Contract.one
@contractoneapp
https://t.co/FMCeSRYv6j is a platform for negotiations and collaborative contracting. #legaltech #legalops #negotiations
Newark, DE, USA 加入时间 Haziran 2020
852 关注428 粉丝
What's the best document formatting tool (probably Word plug-in) that you've used to make your docs/contract templates house-style (i.e. font/styles/paragraph numbering etc..) standardised?
English
This is probably what it feels like when you’re having several email/comments/messenger discussions in parallel
English
@Clevy_Law True. Take contract drafting culture. With tech, you get highly automated and completely incomprehensible and inhumane truckloads of text.
English
@jackwshepherd We agree. Sometimes we want to add "And always write it as if normal people would read it, too". The chances it gets to its true users (business folks, customers, etc.) are much higher than it ends up with a judge.
English
Btw, maybe there’s a lack of legal tech adoption because some software in 2022 still looks like Internet Explorer 6.0 in 2001
English
Discovered Web Design Museum. Check out how Google, SpaceX, YouTube, Apple, Lego, and other folks upgraded their UI/UX design through time. The same should happen to legal tech.
Link: webdesignmuseum.org
English
Wouldn’t it be nice to know the paragraph history?
Andrew Kinsey (@andrewkinsey.bluesky.social)@KinseyAndrew
Me: Wow, who added this edit? It's really bad. Me, after checking the history: Oh, it was me.
English
Any doc automation project would benefit immensely if started with legal design and standardization. Smartly designed documents improve legal tech adoption and show extra value.
English
Today’s documents are largely incompatible with legal innovation. It’s always a challenge to automate documents with too many options and inter-dependencies in them, with walls of text and low standardization across hundreds of templates.
#LegalDesign #LegalTech #ContractOne
English
Contract.one leaves no chance to confuse versions. Whatever you do, you’re in the right version but have full access to the entire history of negotiations—who did what, and when.
Isn’t this magic?
#ContractOne #Versioning
English
That's why in Contract.one no one can send the document to the counterparty before all the stakeholders approve it.
Zen Lawyer Journey@zenlawyerjourn1
Business guy: you didn’t tell me not to forward that email! Me: i marked it “privileged and confidential” Biz: say “do not forward” if that’s what you mean. I’m not a mind reader
English
@PeterPmoran @peer_legal @PeterPmoran regarding your comment on benefits ending with sending the document by email. With our Continuity feature you can enjoy all the magic even if the other party is not using Contract.one yet.
English
#ContractOne in Law Institute Journal!
@PeterPmoran from @peer_legal shares his team’s experience with the Contract.one. “This can greatly speed up the review process...”
Read here: fliphtml5.com/lxdj/depk (p. 64)
#Negotiations #ContractOne #LegalTech
English
@PeterPmoran @peer_legal “There is no risk of amendments being missed through not being included in the tracked-changes as every change to the agreement will always be shown.”
English
@PeterPmoran @peer_legal “This can greatly speed up the review process and reduces the need to rely on mark-ups and track change to monitor contract evolution.”
English
What if Contract.one existed in 1987 when U2 wrote “With or Without You”?
What song would you to re-negotiate?
#negotiations #legaltech #ContractOne
GIF
English