置顶推文
a meta story
2.9K posts

a meta story
@smashsharp
that you are now part of involving creative arts, tech dev, light art and illusions - add stories onto any tweet- community art project
加入时间 Eylül 2013
299 关注464 粉丝
a meta story 已转推

I used to defend college and university. I went to one. I taught at one.
But I can't keep pretending the math still works for most people. Commoditized degrees. Skills that AI can (or will) replace. Six figures of debt before earning. Self-education with AI and mentorship will get most people further in a fraction of the time and cost.
I'm not anti-education. I genuinely love education.
I just can't ignore the risk anymore. And I don't think you can either.
English

@r0ck3t23 Yes but the thing is Microsoft standardized us. One thing was picked then a universal sprang from it and innovation really sprang up.
The bottleneck of ai is that it’s inherently chaotic and allows everyone do their own way and in that lies a problem nobody addresses.
English

Andrej Karpathy just described something most people are not psychologically ready to hear.
The man who built the AI team at Tesla and helped shape OpenAI from the inside, just sat down on a podcast and told every researcher listening that they are building their own replacement. And they already know it.
Karpathy: “You guys realize if we’re successful, we’re all out of a job?”
That was not a joke. That was not a thought experiment.
He walked the halls at OpenAI and said it directly. The response was not disagreement.
It was silence. Because they can see it working.
But here is the part almost everyone is getting wrong.
The short-term picture is the complete opposite of what people expect. Software demand is not about to collapse. It is about to spike harder than any point in the history of computing.
Karpathy: “Code is now ephemeral and it can change and it can be modified.”
For fifty years every business on the planet was trapped inside whatever software they could afford to buy. You subscribed to tools built for someone else. You adapted your workflow to fit their product. You lived with the friction because rewriting it from scratch would cost more than your entire department.
That constraint just evaporated.
When AI can rewrite code instantly and endlessly the entire digital layer of the global economy is about to get torn apart and rebuilt from the ground up. Not upgraded. Not patched.
Rebuilt.
Every company on Earth suddenly has the ability to generate software that fits their exact needs in real time. That is not less demand for software. That is an explosion of demand so massive most people have not even begun to process the scale.
And then the long-term hits.
Karpathy: “These researchers are basically automating themselves away, like actively.”
These are not factory workers watching a robot take over the assembly line. These are the most elite engineering minds alive building a system that will do their job better than they can.
And they feel it.
The interviewer called it a psychosis and Karpathy did not push back on the word. Because that is exactly what it is.
Imagine going to work every day knowing that every breakthrough you achieve brings you one step closer to making yourself unnecessary. That every improvement you ship teaches the machine to need you a little less.
That is the psychological reality inside every major AI lab on Earth right now.
And if the people building the thing know they are on borrowed time there is no protected class. Not lawyers. Not analysts. Not engineers. Not researchers.
Nobody gets to sit this one out.
Karpathy: “We’re just building automation for Sam or something like that. Or the board.”
That line landed quiet but it is the most important thing he said.
The AI does not work for the engineer who built it. It works for whoever sits at the top of the organization.
When the entire R&D pipeline can be automated the thousand-person research lab compresses down to a founder and a fleet of agents. The middle layer does not get restructured.
It gets deleted.
The people building these systems understand that better than anyone. And they are building them anyway.
Because if they do not someone else will. And then they are out with nothing to show for it.
That is the trap nobody talks about. The smartest people in the world are locked in a race where winning and losing both end the same way for them personally.
Karpathy did not speculate about some distant future on that podcast. He told you what is already happening inside the buildings where this technology gets made.
The short-term boom is real. The long-term displacement is real.
And the people closest to the fire are the ones getting burned first.
English

@djcows In that it’s reduced the role of the human and duplicated it, sure.
I think it’s exactly the tool that inhumane people at the top will cartel together to use against the have nots.
It’s likely best ti say it has some abilities to equalize with same abilities to monopolize.
English

@WaterRabbitt @vegastarr I have years of schooling. I love learning. Most school before university was a waste of my time. It was teaching cogism and that’s outside my range. So the whole of pre-university was rough for me. I like academics but I’m realistic that most of its philosophies of elites.
English

@smashsharp @vegastarr It’s fair to debate what was taught, but reducing education to ‘elite academics’ misses the point. Critical thinking and self‑sufficiency aren’t automatic—they’re skills built over time, shaped by family, community and experience, not just school.
English

@lilyally98 It’s an interesting point - morals give a refinement that shows in look, a pride maybe.
But, out of curiosity, have you ever found something that you know everyone finds ugly but it’s beautiful to you?
English

Beauty is morally salient. If you believe these two are morally equal, then you are more disordered than Satan himself.


Corey J. Mahler@CoreyJMahler
Beauty is morally salient. If you believe these two are morally equal, then you are more disordered than Satan himself.
English

@Silvermoon_888 Oh this cute. 🥰 You just labeled me a psychopath for asking you to stop de-humanizing other humans.
Im having fun now. Vroom vroom.
English

This psychopath got triggered by me saying that that AI is soulless, like a psychopath. My gawd stay off the internet fragile ego.
a meta story@smashsharp
@Silvermoon_888 @NoahKingJr Do you often tell other humans they are soulless? If so I’d like you to consider that your inhumane behavior towards fellow humans is what led people to prefer soulless robots.
English

@Silvermoon_888 @NoahKingJr You seem bored, angry and the type to want to pin labels on others so you can declare them bad and scapegoat all your self-hatred on de-humanize them. Nice to meet you, I’m Ma Pen and it’s best you not pretend you know me. Thx.
English

@smashsharp @NoahKingJr Identifying a psychopath isn't inhumane. You seem offeneded/angry and seem like the type of person that blames your own disgusting behaviour on other people. ie. a psychopath. So glad that offended you.
English

@sadhavi The ancient sages and yogis were taken care of by their small tribes and small community.
Large communities do not take care of their sages, I say that’s how they got here, fending for themselves, hoping people buy.
English

Spirituality was never meant to be sold. The ancient sages, yogis and Rishis who discovered this practice, the inner science of soul never sold it because they knew the moment spirituality becomes organized, truth disappears. Because, truth can’t be sold. But today, it’s one of the biggest industries in the world. And here’s the irony- both, India & West are equally responsible for it.
English

@WaterRabbitt @vegastarr The shared knowledge was not about how to start a bank account. The shared knowledge you speak of is academics, which made one suited to walk among the elite. Yes, that was part of the day, the other part cogism and society cogism.
Critical thinking, self-sufficiency- nill.
English

@smashsharp @vegastarr School was never a monastic forge for perfect workers.
It taught shared knowledge, not lifelong employability.
If employers now automate people out of relevance, the curriculum isn’t the failure — the economic model is.
Self‑sufficiency is a societal task, not a syllabus tweak.
English

@goodyhilton I’ll assume you were being funny because that is some complicated self-flagellation 😄
English





