Post

Build Fast with AI
Build Fast with AI@BuildFastWithAI·
Antigravity CLI vs Antigravity 2.0 app - what should you use? Most people are conflating them because they shipped on the same day. Here's the actual split: Antigravity 2.0 (desktop app): - Visual command center for orchestrating agents - Mission Control to manage multiple agents at once - Scheduled background tasks, voice commands - Best for: project-level orchestration, watching agents work in parallel, switching between projects Antigravity CLI: - Terminal binary, written in Go - Same agent harness as 2.0, no GUI - Wires into pre-commit hooks, CI pipelines, deploy gates - Best for: scripting, tmux/remote SSH, automation, "agent as a Unix tool" The shared harness is the part that matters. When Google ships a new tool or a better planning loop, it lands in both the same day. You can start a task in the CLI on a remote server, then check on it from the desktop app on your laptop - same context, same agents. Mental model: - CLI is the agent as a script you run - 2.0 is the agent as an app you manage - IDE is the agent as a pair programmer which surface are you actually using day to day?
Build Fast with AI tweet media
English
1
0
3
71
onecookie
onecookie@_onecookie·
@BuildFastWithAI The CLI feels more interesting to me than the app. It can plug into existing tmux, SSH and remote dev setups directly.
English
0
0
0
14
Paylaş