@Hi_im_Chuckles @OrwellNGoode It’s much easier to get 51% than 100%. In any voter scenario, 100% is literally impossible.

@Bemesda @OrwellNGoode False and Naive. But youre young so i do not fault you.

@Hi_im_Chuckles @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode one of the points against blue in here is a point against red???? One of the statements in here literally says that a red majority would be catastrophic lmao

@uLTvacquaa @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode comprehension issue. If you push a campaign to make everyone vote red, some will still vote blue and die (minimal loss) or if red still loses everyone lives (win/win) If you push a campaign to make everyone vote blue, if blue wins, cool, but if blue loses its a catastrophe

@Hi_im_Chuckles @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode …..exactly there’s no downside to a blue majority

@uLTvacquaa @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode Absolutely but you like most "irrational" blue votes are making a crucial mistake. This isnt fairy tale land its real life and all aspects must be considered to come to a REALISTIC conclusion. Not a delusional one bcos "it makes me feel good inside"

@uLTvacquaa @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode Also i completely forgot to mention. Where does it say it needs to be 100%? Where did i even imply i want 100% either? Im all for weeding out the dumb, weak, and pretend-altruistic parasites

@Hi_im_Chuckles @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode how do you feel about the fact that red button voters on average are much lower in IQ?

@Hi_im_Chuckles @uLTvacquaa @OrwellNGoode That’s the original question which the original post of this thread is referencing in a false equivalent comparison.

@Hi_im_Chuckles @uLTvacquaa @Bemesda @OrwellNGoode "Im all for weeding out the dumb, weak, and pretend-altruistic parasites" Yeah, here it is, behind all the "rational "mask that is your true goal... this social experiment is very interesting as it reveal very interesting things...