It’s amazing how little modern Trinitarians understand about the historical Trinitarian teachings. Example: Only the Father has aseity. This is simply fact, yet most modern Trinitarians decry such a claim. “All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except causality.”

@QuestionTrinity Different people had different nuances to how they understood the relationship of the Son to the Father, but the simple fact is, the Son was the person in the burning bush when the divine, covenant name was established. "YHWH" points to God's aseity.

@QuestionTrinity Q-T-T, The Time has come and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the Gospel.

@QuestionTrinity To travel through triune time you must exist as three. 1) future = God the Father of Love 2) Present = God the Holy Spirit of Judgment 3) Past = God the Son of Righteousness God is Love. 1) Plan love = future 2) Do love = present 3) Love done = past

@QuestionTrinity Thats because you are misusing the terms. The more proper terms is that the Father is Unbegotten, while the Son is Begotten, and the Spirit proceeds. Some of the early church writers may have used the word cause at times, but they meant on hypostatic level! Not the Essence level!

@QuestionTrinity If Arians had a good argument they would not have lost the debate at the council.