Post

Allan Hirt
Allan Hirt@SQLHA·
For the 1,000,000th time: you have servers (VMs, physical) that run instances of SQL Server. SQL is not a product. It's a language. You DO NOT HAVE SQL SERVERS FFS
English
16
2
17
0
Rie Merritt🌻
Rie Merritt🌻@IrishSQL·
@SQLHA Well, "servers upon which I have installed Microsoft sql server" is a bit much.
English
2
0
5
0
Tim Ford
Tim Ford@sqlagentman·
@SQLHA Servers serving SQL Server.
English
1
0
4
0
Darryl van der Peijl
Darryl van der Peijl@DarrylvdPeijl·
@SQLHA SQL server servers? Exchange server servers? Sharepoint server servers? 🤔
English
1
0
3
0
Simon Holman
Simon Holman@SimonHolman·
@SQLHA You don't "Google" with Google either, you search with it, but it's become a standardised term, just like the fact that we run SQL Server's.
English
1
0
0
0
SQLElLídre
SQLElLídre@DSFNet·
@SQLHA It's days like this you question if this job is worth it.
English
1
0
0
0
John Cas
John Cas@moresunshine_1·
@SQLHA But it’s just like Access isn’t it? Had one call for access to the db server. Then to find out they wanted MS Access installed on the server. Arguhhhh
English
1
0
0
0
John Cas
John Cas@moresunshine_1·
@SQLHA I see the context you are coming from. I had the unfortunate time of having to accep a “manger” treated Exchange server and SQL server teams differently because SQL server was in his eyes a hardware device. 🤬
English
1
0
0
0
Paylaş