Tyler Robinson is a patsy, who didn’t act alone and he definitely didn’t shoot Charlie Kirk. Change my mind.

@IWashington I completely agree. I've been saying this from the very beginning. Somehow, simply pointing out the facts is now labeled a 'conspiracy theory.' That tells me we're getting dangerously close to the target.

@ScienceBlog3 @IWashington What facts? What do you have that the defense doesn’t have? What do you have that disproves what’s been shown in court?

@DevinDishes @IWashington Well, first of all, Tyler Robinson is certainly is guilty. A murderous fool with a gun, but he didn't act alone. A common theme is that these people act alone. They certainly don't, and overall, the entire community of Antifa shares the blame for all the violent actions & lies.

@DevinDishes @IWashington Second, yes the physical, digital, and testimonial evidence accumulated points to Robinson as a lone gunman motivated by personal/political animus (he was Antifa, expressed frustration with Kirk’s views, and planned it over about a week).

@DevinDishes @IWashington Third, Antifa is a terrorist organization in which Robinson was heavily involved. They created a narrative of lies about Charlie Kirk that played a role in shaping the character of Tyler Robinson's actions.

@ScienceBlog3 @IWashington Also, you said in your first response to Isaiah that you “completely agreed” with him saying TR didn’t shoot Charlie. Then you immediately contradicted yourself by say TR was “guilty” of shooting him. So which is it?

@ScienceBlog3 @IWashington You are the first person I’ve seen anywhere say that Tyler was involved with Antifa. Do you have viable evidence of this?