Why Professor Gary Marcus @GaryMarcus and Sam Altman @sama are both right about today’s AI: tinyurl.com/5dvdhys4

@SingularityNET @sama define “near”

@SingularityNET @GaryMarcus @sama "AGI" won't be part of the current AI tech stack, and no, those power wasting GPU clusters don't play any role in building or powering what is on the horizon.

@SingularityNET @GaryMarcus @sama By what metric are they overhyped if we have millions of people losing cognitive thought, won’t make decisions without consulting ChatGPT and is increasing unemployment in automated and creative jobs. We aren’t listening to the creators of the tech and just worried about $$$

@SingularityNET @GaryMarcus @sama

@SingularityNET @GaryMarcus @sama No sorry, Gary Marcus is not right about his unscientific and ideologically motivated hypotheses. Actual valid and sound scientific studies prove in hard and reliable parameters the rise of neural networks, MoA/MoE structures towards at least a form of linear, emerging awareness.

@SingularityNET @GaryMarcus @sama Marcus is right that some LLM valuations will suffer corrections. Altman is right that HLAGI is near and trillions of dollars will be invested because all the other dollars are going to be worthless, but this is not a good investment strategy because the world will be destroyed.