
Mailbox Vandalism: Poor Choices, Poor Outcomes!
LIVE RIGHT NOW! youtube.com/live/tRGWNxKYf…
Across the country, homeowners have quietly found a simple answer to the increasingly common crime of mailbox bashing: fill the box with concrete. When a vandal swings a bat and connects with sixty pounds of hardened cement, physics does the rest.
A viral X thread ignited a national argument about property rights, criminal responsibility, and how far an owner can go to protect what is theirs.
The moral case for the concrete mailbox is not complicated. The property owner is doing nothing more than reinforcing something he owns. The vandal, by contrast, is committing criminal mischief against that property -- a crime in every state. Any injury that follows flows directly from the criminal's own deliberate act. We do not ordinarily hold property owners responsible for the foreseeable consequences of other people's crimes. If someone breaks their arms swinging a bat at your mailbox from a moving vehicle, that’s on them.
Join me for a leisurely and gun walk through the X thread that sparked this debate, and various points and counterpoints, examines the legal landscape around property protection and so-called booby trap statutes, and makes the case that hardening your own property is categorically different from laying a trap designed to injure. That line matters, and understanding where it falls is something every property owner should know.
Join me LIVE right after the open-access show as I break it all down.
Episode #M1304
youtube.com/live/tRGWNxKYf…

YouTube
English










