What do you mean that you had shut down your podcast and gone private shortly before Charlie’s assassination? What do you mean that you never watched one episode of Charlie’s podcast? What do you mean that if someone had asked you a week prior to Charlie’s death how you felt about him, you would have said, “eh, you could take him or leave him… he wasn’t a saint, he wasn’t god”? You’ve spent the last 7 months making money off a man you openly admit you didn’t really care about. You had shut down your podcast and gone private, but then Charlie is assassinated and suddenly you care? Suddenly you become one of the loudest voices in the room? The truth is you saw an opportunity to capitalize on a man’s death and you took it. Then you pushed wild conspiracies and attacked his widow for a man that, by your own words, you could “take or leave.” You piled on and encouraged attacks against Erika. You demanded alibis for accusations you created out of thin air, while at the same time saying Tyler Robinson doesn’t have to prove anything and that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the case against him. So which is it? Because according to you, Tyler deserves the presumption of innocence, but Erika has to prove hers to the internet mob you helped create. You weaponized speculation, outrage, and social media for clicks and money. You turned a tragedy into entertainment. You helped spread harassment and suspicion toward a grieving widow while pretending to stand for truth and justice. But “eh’ you could take him or leave him”, right? You’re a reprobate, Baron Coleman.