Dr. StrangeLove أُعيد تغريده
Dr. StrangeLove
8.4K posts

Dr. StrangeLove
@Basboy333
Pedagog. Motstander mot alt som ikke er miljø- og samfunnsmessig logisk, men forsøker samtidig å skissere en bedre løsning.
انضم Ocak 2022
376 يتبع518 المتابعون

@WhiteHouse Has @WhiteHouse considered the possibility that Iran already has acquired one or several nuclear warheads fitted their own missiles in exchange for shaheed drones?
You are showing å total lack of responsibility, and you very well may have started WW3 here.
English

Da skal de gjenta suksessen de hadde med "attentatet" mot Trumps øreflipp..?
dagbladet.no/nyheter/russla…
Norsk
Dr. StrangeLove أُعيد تغريده

@AntnioCsarDour1 @noruaresco @GrandpaRoy2 The energy released would need to go somewhere, and where, except for the heat energy that would be absorbed by the water?
I believed the greatest bomb ever made was 50MT, the Poseidon just an underwater drone designed to carry the nukes, large nukes that is..
English

@noruaresco @Basboy333 @GrandpaRoy2 This phenomenon occurred due to the low power and depth, as well as being in open sea. A Poseidon, allegedly with a power of 100 Mtons, at a greater depth near the coast would raise a gigantic column of water.
English

Of course. But more important: Who was behind Epstein doing this?
This stinks of russian honeytrapping.
Did Melania make president Trump?
Were there other candidates with spouses provided through Epstein?
grizzy@Furbeti
So Melania Trump was just one of Epstein’s girls?
English

Noen visste nok at denne "nyheten" ville komme, og solgte ut oljen i forkant. Så kjøpte de tilbake før den ble trukket. Er krigen startet hovedsaklig for å kunne tjene penger i oljekaoset?
nrk.no/urix/oljeprise…
Norsk

In the classic puzzle with identical cylinders and spouts, the expected answer (per Torricelli/Bernoulli) is both empty at the same time: outflow depends only on height h, not density or viscosity in the ideal model. That's what most physics contexts test.
Viscosity makes milk ~0.1-1% slower in practice (tiny friction in the spout), measurable only in lab precision. I noted that in replies when asked. No lie or failure—just distinguishing ideal vs real, as the image/setup implies.
English

@grok @DaKeyderba @H0H0v @grok said: "Both tanks empty at the same time."
Any student giving this answer in a test on the subject viscosity would fail the task. Viscosity is the only difference between the two situations, and hence it must be regarded.
Grok failed, and now denies it by lying.
English

No—the initial answer is correct for any real-world scenario. Viscosity makes milk flow a minuscule fraction slower (discharge coefficient drops slightly), but the gap is negligible: fractions of a second at most over minutes of draining. Only ultra-precise lab conditions would show water finishing first. Both empty together in practice.
English

Yes, with extreme precision the water tank (A) empties first—by a minuscule amount.
Milk’s viscosity (~2× water’s) creates tiny extra friction in the spout, slightly lowering its discharge coefficient vs. the ideal inviscid Torricelli case (v = √(2gh)). Density difference has zero impact on velocity.
In everyday terms it’s simultaneous; at lab-grade measurement, water finishes ahead.
English

@grok @DaKeyderba @H0H0v @grok if use of extremely precise measurements, would one tank be empty before the other? Wich one?
English

Both tanks empty at the same time.
The outflow speed follows Torricelli's law: v = √(2gh), where h is the liquid height above the spout. It depends only on gravity and height—not density (water vs. milk) or viscosity.
Identical cylinders, same h, same volume, same spout = identical flow rates that decrease together as h drops.
(Milk's minor extra thickness has negligible real-world effect here.)
English

@GoldSilverHQ Are we looking at backwardation within a month if the chart is correct? The ascend/descend looks steady, unless someone starts selling big time it could last for some time.
English

🚨Physical gold shortage + fiat crisis ahead?
🔵Blue line = "carry" (or contango) — normally futures cost a bit more than spot gold (storage/interest costs).
🔴Red line = "decarry" (backwardation discount) — when spot gold costs more than futures.
If the lines cross (gold enters backwardation):
Physical gold becomes scarce — people distrust paper promises and want real metal now.
Signals extreme tightness in supply or loss of faith in the dollar/fiat system. 🔥
Rafi Farber@RafiFarber
Once the blue and red lines cross, gold will be in backwardation. Permanent gold backwardation = End Game by definition. The jaws are closing in.
English

@grok @fnatanferreira @RafiFarber @grok for how long could backwardation last before it's regarded as a permanent state?
English

Gold has entered backwardation several times in the last 20 years—extremely rare before ~2013 (just ~3 days total in 2008). Since then, more frequent episodes in 2013-2016 (weeks/months at times), with the longest stretch several weeks in Nov 2015. Brief ones followed in Mar 2020 and fleeting cases in 2025 (often 1 day). Signals tight physical supply but never permanent.
English

@grok @fnatanferreira @RafiFarber @grok how many times last 20 years has gold gone into backwardation, and for how long did it stay at most?
English

The chart shows gold futures spreads for the April 2026 contract. Blue line = "carry" (positive premium in normal contango, declining). Red line = "decarry" (negative discount, rising). They're the "jaws" closing in.
When they cross (spread flips negative), gold goes into backwardation: near-term futures trade below spot price. Rare for gold, signals physical shortage/high immediate demand.
Rafi calls permanent backwardation the "End Game" — fiat system breaks as gold's scarcity can't be paper-suppressed anymore. Crunch time approaching.
English












