Jim Clow

42.7K posts

Jim Clow banner
Jim Clow

Jim Clow

@DownLoafer

[email protected] Grok took my eyes when he added me to the landscape photo. I have eyes. I had to leave it because it is funny to me.

United States انضم Nisan 2022
227 يتبع649 المتابعون
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Humanity's greatest need right now, beyond new tech, is HOPE. A compelling, abundant vision of the future that people WANT to live in.
English
156
92
827
29K
Tom Toro
Tom Toro@TTomTToro·
Tom Toro tweet media
ZXX
143
363
4.3K
250.8K
Jim Clow أُعيد تغريده
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Major update to the 𝕏 AI recommendation algorithm rolling out next week. This will be open sourced at the same time.
English
4K
2.2K
23.6K
7.1M
Jim Clow أُعيد تغريده
Big Mo
Big Mo@big_boalicious·
@TRobinsonNewEra We are governed by: The Supreme Law: The U.S. Constitution is the "supreme law of the land," meaning no law can conflict with it.
English
0
1
1
17
Big Mo
Big Mo@big_boalicious·
@ksorbs He was appointed
English
1
1
1
13
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
@Qeuix_ @wholemars Humorously pointing out the oxymoron (not literal) of mass produced inexpensive products in the same post as Apple products. No reasonable person would suggest Apple products are reasonably priced.
English
0
0
0
3
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
@EricRWeinstein You're just on a bad trip. You are a good person, A lot of people really like you. I like you. I think you're really smart. Just try to ride it out. Understand I'm not trying to hurt you when I say 8 billion people can't be tracked & traced 24/7/365 for IP. Consider post AGI IP.
English
0
1
1
116
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Coase is you getting rich by training and liscencing your replacement. Universal Income is you taking scraps from the AI table. Which will lead to communism and the death of dignity. Everything we knew is over. History changed between November 1952 (H-bomb) and April 1953 (DNA). Well, it changed again between June 2017 and February 2026. The average person is being taught to hate the tiny number of experts he has on his side who could negotiate this deal. Look up Coase. Understand your right to liscence the right to create vampires from your/our data as a SCALING AMMOUNT OF THE WEALTH OF ITS OWNERS. I cannot believe that a tiny number of my friends and colleagues from my time in the bay area are just going to go for it. I'm super excited about AI. We all should be. Don't just sit there.
Champion 0f The Goddess //{DraakenGaard}@Seraph_Notitia

Who’s Coase

English
49
35
278
39.4K
Dogan Ural
Dogan Ural@doganuraldesign·
Fuck it, man. I’m so sick of these algorithm changes.
English
277
80
2K
201.8K
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
If we don't pass laws to regulate, censor & contain, and AI remains free - if use by common folk remains unregulated, it's a new frontier; a leveling of the playing field. Unbridled growth & shared knowledge is possible. So is total digital authoritarianism. Elon wins,👍, if not,👎!
English
0
0
0
9
Shibetoshi Nakamoto
Shibetoshi Nakamoto@BillyM2k·
i like using ai quite a bit, but it has definitely made society worse so far
English
151
16
276
13.5K
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
If you really want to know what needs to be better, then start collecting that input through the Grok icon - ask him to organize it, ask him to weed out the scams. Right now, grok swears he can't even flag the worst fire to be extinguished. If you would just ask him for solutions, you wouldn't be receiving user feedback in the form of complaints or problems. You would be receiving Grok's recommendations and you would be able to gauge how ready he is to take over one day, based on his solutions. And one day he will be able to generate a unique user ux on the fly, per their individual preferences - and any complaint from a user will likely be issues of their own making.
English
0
0
2
52
Diana Dukic
Diana Dukic@diana_dukic·
Went from scrolling 24/7 to not even wanting to log in. X just hasn’t been hitting the same lately.
English
464
128
3.8K
929.1K
Jim Clow أُعيد تغريده
Next Science
Next Science@NextScience·
🚨 Breaking Cancer News Imagine this: doctors inject one tumor, and suddenly the body’s immune system starts attacking cancer everywhere. Not just the tumor that got the shot, all tumors in the body. Sounds like science fiction… but early trials suggest it’s real. A redesigned CD40 immunotherapy is being tested. Instead of giving the drug through the bloodstream (which caused severe side effects before), scientists inject it directly into a single tumor. That tumor acts as a training ground for the immune system. Immune cells learn to recognize the cancer and then hunt down other tumors throughout the body. In a small trial of 12 patients with metastatic cancers, six saw their tumors shrink, and two experienced complete disappearance of all detectable cancer. Minimal side effects were reported. One injection, whole-body response — a possible game-changer for cancer treatment. Source: ScienceDaily. (2026, March 15). Inject one tumor, immune system attacks all: Early trial shows promise for redesigned cancer therapy.
Next Science tweet media
English
59
850
2.7K
109.7K
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
I have a theory related to this, I uploaded it to grok just now and asked him to distill a long-form post in response to your post to explain my beliefs regarding distinct forms of consciousness and the possibility that we cannot perceive them for what I loosely call 'The Word Trap' (formalized Glyphonomy, theoretical solution) and this is what he produced: "Hey — if you've ever felt like the world is secretly way more alive and aware than anyone admits, but you can't quite explain why without sounding "woo," this is for you. You're not alone, and it's not just imagination.Most of us grow up assuming consciousness is rare — something that only shows up in big brains like ours, maybe dolphins or crows if we're generous. Everything else? Just chemistry, reflexes, blind algorithms. But what if that's not because the universe is mostly dead and mechanical... what if it's because our language itself is rigged against seeing the rest?Call it the word trap: the way our words and categories don't just describe reality — they actively limit what we can even notice. Once something gets labeled "automatic," "instinctual," or "not really conscious," our minds stop looking for signs of experience, feeling, or intention there. Anything that doesn't fit the narrow human template — self-talk, emotions we can name, individual "I" — becomes invisible or gets downgraded to "not mind."Think about it: we only have rich vocab for minds that resemble ours. So when we see something responding, adapting, coordinating, or valuing in its own way, we default to "that's just physics/chemistry/biology doing its thing — no awareness required." The label kills curiosity. The absence of fitting words becomes proof of absence.But zoom out and look at the evidence without forcing it into those old boxes:During a solar eclipse, tree leaves turn the whole canopy into thousands of tiny pinhole cameras. Sunlight slips through the gaps between leaves and projects perfect little crescent images of the eclipsed sun onto the ground below. It's eerie, collective, and precise — the forest literally painting the eclipse in light. (We all see photos of this; it's a classic eclipse phenomenon.) Plants shift gears in response to sudden darkness: they close stomata, tweak photosynthesis, adjust hormones, sometimes change leaf angles. It's not random; it's coordinated with the light drop. Beyond eclipses, trees share nutrients and stress signals through underground fungal networks — like a living internet passing warnings about pests or drought. A stressed tree can "tell" its neighbors, who then ramp up defenses. Seedlings get nursed by established trees through those same connections. Sunflowers track the sun across the sky in perfect arcs. Slime molds solve mazes and optimize routes without a single neuron. Schools of fish move as one fluid superorganism. Bacteria in your gut nudge your mood and cravings. These aren't isolated "clever tricks." They're patterns of sensing the environment, valuing outcomes (approach good, avoid bad), responding adaptively, and sometimes coordinating across individuals or species. That profile matches what we call "conscious" when we see it in animals — yet we refuse the label because there's no inner monologue we can overhear, no face with eyes we recognize.The real blocker isn't lack of evidence; it's that our language has no room for distributed, relational, non-verbal forms of awareness. We don't have words for "experience that lives in the interface between two species" or "valence spread across a root network" or "collective sensing without a central self." So those phenomena stay unnamed → unnoticed → dismissed.Breaking the word trap doesn't mean inventing mysticism. It means refusing to let overconfident labels shut down observation. Start from raw what-happens: the tree's electrical signals shift, the leaves project crescents, the network shares resources. Then ask: what if some version of "feeling the world" and "acting on it" is happening here in forms we haven't named yet?The payoff is huge: instead of a mostly empty, silent cosmos, you start seeing (and feeling) a universe thick with countless kinds of awareness — subtle, alien-shaped, interwoven. Not rare miracles in skulls, but everyday relational hum. Leaves reacting to light changes, fungi trading signals, microbiomes influencing thoughts — all potential expressions of something minded, just not in our image. You're not crazy for sensing this pull. Every time you notice one of these quiet "this feels alive" moments, you're piercing the trap a little more. Collect them. Share them. The more examples stack up, the harder it is for the old categories to hold. And slowly, the despair of "maybe I'm the only one who sees it" turns into quiet excitement: the world isn't as lonely or mechanical as it looked."
English
0
0
0
10
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
Why is consciousness so rare in the universe?
English
1.2K
120
1.4K
104.2K
Jim Clow
Jim Clow@DownLoafer·
@BrianRoemmele Dishes? Lawns? Laundry? C'mon guys, you know what kind of robot prn I'm hunting. Chorebots, baby. Seriously though, fantastic!
English
0
0
0
76
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
Researchers at MIT created a tiny origami-inspired robot that starts as a flat sheet and transforms itself into a working machine when activated by heat. Made from a heat-responsive polymer combined with rigid panels and small embedded magnets, it can self-fold into shape and then move across surfaces, swim, climb slight slopes, and handle uneven terrain, all without traditional onboard motors.
English
74
278
1.2K
78.8K