Elad Radson

The Wire will no longer be using Clash Report as a source, regardless of the veracity of its posts.

Polanski now retweeting one of the most virulently antisemitic accounts in Ireland, a man who was literally invited to Tehran by the Iranian regime to join a propaganda junket.

The entire Tucker Carlson enterprise is foreign-funded smoke and mirrors. He only actually has 7,300 paying subscribers to his site, and hundreds of people on X get more “views” than him. Even I, with under 75,000 followers, get nearly as many. His audience is Thrid World bots.

Pleased to meet with Ambassador @GeorgeDeek, Israel’s Envoy to Christians. @Israel stands out as the only country in the region with a growing Christian population — and for good reason. Both our nations cherish religious liberty as the foundation of a free and prosperous society.

Invent a genocide hoax in Gaza and spread it with remarkable success, and there's the template for opposing all future Israeli wars. “They destroyed some buildings - genocide!”

🚨L’armée israélienne vient de neutraliser l’unité du Hezbollah responsable de la mort des deux soldats français.

“International law” is when slave-owning dictators bribe sexual predators to have you prosecuted at a court presided over by your enemies. 👌

That was fast

Elon Musk donated $38 million to keep artificial intelligence free. Microsoft invested $13 billion to capture it. Microsoft’s $13 billion is now worth $228 billion. Musk’s $38 million is worth zero. That asymmetry is the entire trial. Musk testified for one hour and forty minutes yesterday before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. He called it simple. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit was founded in 2015 to build AGI for humanity. Open-source charter. Public benefit certificate. Donors gave $133 million under those representations. Then the operators converted it into an $852 billion for-profit corporation and kept the technology. “It is not okay to steal a charity.” The structure tells the story. OpenAI incorporated as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in 2015. In 2019 it created a capped-profit subsidiary. By October 2025, the caps were removed and the entity became a Public Benefit Corporation. The nonprofit foundation retained 25.8 percent equity and board control. Microsoft held 26.79 percent. After the March 2026 round, valuation reached $852 billion. The foundation’s stake, acquired at zero cost, is worth $219.8 billion on paper. The question before the court is whether that evolution was a legitimate response to capital demands or a breach of charitable trust that no regulator, board, or funding round can cure. Musk’s position: he co-founded it, named it, recruited key researchers, donated $38 million, and agreed with Sam Altman on nonprofit status with open-source publication. He tolerated hybrid discussions only if “the tail didn’t wag the dog.” He left the board in February 2018. He claims the tail consumed the dog. OpenAI’s defense is equally documented. In November 2015, Musk emailed that the structure “doesn’t seem optimal” and proposed “a standard C corp with a parallel nonprofit.” In 2017, he created a for-profit entity through his attorney and demanded 50 to 60 percent equity and the CEO role. Greg Brockman’s diary, Exhibit 43, records that Musk’s pledge was contingent on control. When denied, he resigned. He did not sue until 2024, after launching xAI. What nobody covering this trial has connected is why it matters beyond the courtroom. If Musk prevails, every nonprofit that evolves into a commercial entity faces donor litigation risk. If OpenAI prevails, charitable missions can be monetized at planetary scale provided the nonprofit retains board seats. Neither outcome is clean. And here is the trans-domain dimension the financial press is missing entirely. The man suing to keep AI nonprofit is simultaneously building the largest for-profit AI company on Earth. xAI raised $20 billion in January at $230 billion. Colossus runs 200,000 GPUs. Grok 4.3 crossed a trillion parameters this month. Terafab targets 1 terawatt per year. Musk is not arguing that AI should not generate profit. He is arguing that this specific entity, founded as charity, funded by charity, and chartered as charity, should not have been converted without founding-donor consent. The distinction is structural, not philosophical. And it will set the precedent for every AI entity that follows. The trial resumes today with cross-examination. Altman and Nadella testify in early May. Advisory jury deliberates around May 12. Judge Gonzalez Rogers issues the binding verdict. $38 million versus $852 billion. A ratio of 22,421 to one. The question is whether a charitable donation entitles the donor to prevent the charity from becoming one of the most valuable companies ever built from a nonprofit charter. The answer will define who owns AGI. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

The British far right in the 1970s … indistinguishable from the British far left today

Qatar is one of Israel’s greatest enemies.

Clash Report, the Turkish psyop that half of political Twitter treats as gospel, had 49,200 followers within 20 hours of its very first tweet. The account — a major source of disinformation and bogus conspiracy theories — is botted as hell. And I can prove it 🧵

Who were the two other men in the car with Amal Khalil? Why did they emerge from a Hezbollah-controlled building? And why did they cross the IDF's forward defense line? These are questions an actual journalist would ask. But I expect nothing of the sort from Drop Site News

If you’re looking for a polite take, this isn’t it. I’ve said it repeatedly on the Conflicted podcast: Pakistan was never a neutral mediator between Washington and Tehran. Not for a second. What we’re watching now is not diplomacy, it’s pure manipulation dressed up as statecraft. Let’s call things by their proper names. Under field marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan isn’t some balanced civilian democracy playing honest broker. It’s a military system with a democratic façade, pursuing its own interests with a level of cynicism that should surprise no one who has followed its behavior over the past two decades. What did they sell to Donald Trump? A fantasy. A pipe dream. That the Islamic Republic can be reasoned with. That it is pragmatic, not ideological. That it is capable of compromise if only you flatter it enough and give it incentives. In short: that you can extract “the deal of the century” from a regime whose entire strategic doctrine is built on resisting precisely that outcome. And Trump - obsessed with the optics of a deal - bought it. Meanwhile, senior voices inside Pakistan weren’t even pretending neutrality. A defence minister pushing conspiratorial narratives, blaming the “Zionists,” portraying Iran as a victim, while 6,000 missiles and drones were raining down on GCC states that host millions of Pakistani workers. That alone should have been disqualifying. If a country is willing to throw its own economic lifeline (the Gulf) under the bus for ideological or tactical alignment with Tehran, what exactly makes anyone think it would safeguard American interests? And here’s the uncomfortable part: this isn’t new. We’ve seen this movie before. The United States spent years, treasure, and blood in Afghanistan, only to discover that Osama bin Laden, and his network, were living comfortably in Pakistan all along - while Pakistan was simultaneously cashing in on US counterterrorism billions in funding. They didn’t fail to find the target. They bloody managed it. Why end the hunt when the hunt itself pays and pays pretty well? Fast forward to today, and the pattern repeats, only this time the battlefield is Iran. At the very moment the regime was under maximum pressure (militarily strained, economically cornered, strategically exposed) Pakistan steps in, not to mediate, but to buy Tehran time. Time to regroup, breathe, and ultimately survive. That’s not mediation. That’s intervention - on one side. From a cold, historical lens, this may well be remembered as the pivot point. The moment when pressure was lifted prematurely. When momentum was lost. When a winnable strategic position was traded for the illusion of a negotiated breakthrough that was never going to materialise, ever! Five years from now, looking back, this could read like a familiar chapter: First Afghanistan - undermined from within. Now Iran - diluted from without. In both cases, Pakistan didn’t just mislead Washington. It shaped the battlefield to its advantage, all while claiming partnership with a clueless US administration. And Washington, once again, chose to believe what it wanted to hear.

The IDF says it eliminated several Hezbollah operatives who approached the Israeli-controlled buffer zone in violation of the ceasefire agreement, in three separate airstrikes in Bint Jbeil and the Litani River area in southern Lebanon.

Even in NAZI Germany, Germans SAVED Jews. Not a SINGLE "Palestinian" saved a SINGLE hostage. Think about that as you watch how a former hostage was treated by "Palestinians". Humanity is ALWAYS a choice.

In one day, 363,000 posts were published on X about the IDF soldier desecrating the statue of Jesus. On Palm Sunday, Islamists massacred 30 Christians in Nigeria. Know how many posts there were about it? According to social listening tools, the answer is just 39,000. Why?

This absolute CRINGE is not gonna go with people the way they thought it will!

This is your typical “reporters in Gaza” Made up story + AI photo. Yet people in the west eat this crap as a full on buffet just to fuel hatred to Israel, based on nothing then lies.

Your daily reminder that @DailyCaller was founded by Buckley Carlson’s father, Tucker Carlson. Additionally, Neil Patel @NeilPatelTDC, who is @TuckerCarlson’s best friend, business partner and the CEO of @TCNetwork Tucker Carlson Network currently runs Daily Caller and was also a cofounder. Tucker wants people to know his son left JD Vance’s office. Wonder why?