BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit
954 posts
BritannianSpirit
@GTXTrainPower
Writer, Roleplayer, Character Hoarder. https://t.co/zCWlNlZwho
Australia انضم Temmuz 2017
643 يتبع21 المتابعون
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
@rendern5000 @currydtx Bystander syndrome - Same way so many people don't act when they see something terrible happen. This is a self admission to calling yourself a malicious coward btw.
English
@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Again, inaction, as the word implies, is not actually an action. It is not 'actively' hurting.
English
Blue is 100% the right choice. There is no reality where all 8 billion people pick red so you have to pick blue to prevent millions from dying.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@rendern5000 @currydtx In this case, we the people do not have as much power, as with the button. But if we did - Yes, absolutely, choosing not to provide for people, is killing them. If youre stranded on an island and hog the food you dont need, from others, letting them starve. YOU'RE the bad guy lol
English
@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Delusional. You can make the argument that society is not providing for everyone, without saying 'everyone, me included, is a murderer'.
If you really think so though, do try to sue yourself for murder in a court of law, by arguing this.
English
@rendern5000 @currydtx Yes, the answer is yes. Us as a society not dedicating resources is quietly literally textbook greed and hurting them actively lmfao.
English
@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Just to really showcase the difference: Are you actively killing people in africa, by not choosing to do away with your own non-basic needs, and using that time and money to help them instead?
English
@rendern5000 @currydtx Both are actively hurting the chances of survival. You dont 'do nothing' by pressing red. You choose 'dont help my fellow man' which is actively hurting. Both analogies work fine lmao. Guilty by omission is still guilty bucko.
English
@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Not really, no. Setting fire = actively hurting. Not helping push the boat = not actively helping. There is a big difference.
Again, sabotaging is something you do actively; choosing not to pick the same side is not the same as sabotaging.
English
@rendern5000 @currydtx Are you deliberately obtuse in this? If red hits 51%, they kill the blue boat. So setting fire to the boat is a fair comparison. Saying they would not be able to push off, because of red, is also fair. Red would be directly sabotaging their attempt either way. Making red bad, lol
English
@GTXTrainPower @currydtx No, the red boat may not potentially set them on fire; the fact that there are not enough people to push the boat off the island would be the way to phrase that <50% means death for the blue boat.
Like.. where do you even get the "red sets fire to them" from?
English
@Salt_Slinger @treyton8402 And yet I make no implications of them being stuck. Simply that there will be people assuming people want to fix the boat, and that those people will die because of the cowardice of those who run.
English
@GTXTrainPower @treyton8402 Everyone on the ship is free to choose the “press this button to live” button. All these “on a ship” or “in a burning building” comparisons come with a “stuck” or “trapped” implication…they imply that some people aren’t free to choose the “get to live” button. Everyone can.
English
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
I didn’t even realize until today that literally everyone who choses red has to say a three paragraph essay cope about why “erm actually according to game theory the red button is most optimal…” like just be honest and say you’re a pussy and don’t want to die lol
Treyton@treyton8402
Anyone who votes red button is a pussy or sociopath
English
@rendern5000 @currydtx Is this your actual take?
The real question would be more akin to, the blue boat being automatic, but needs 51% of the island to help push it off. But, the red boat may potentially set them on fire, and needs 100% of the island in complete unity to achieve the same result.
English
@currydtx Let me rephrase the scenario. You are all trapped on an island. There is no food or anything on it, so you have to escape. Luckily, there are two boats, each having room for everyone. The red boat is automatic and let's everyone that takes it escape safely.
English
@Salt_Slinger @treyton8402 It's more like, abandoning a ship that could be saved with your help.
Sure you saved yourself, but if you, and the other people like you stayed behind, the ship wouldn't sink. Therefore: you are a coward.
English
@treyton8402 No, it’s actually quite simple: the question is designed to see who falls for the red herring (the distraction) and who doesn’t. It can be simplified like this: “press red to live”. It’s very simple if you have average or above IQ.
English
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
Donald Trump has done it again ✌️
Dr. Simon@goddek
And just like that… everybody stopped talking about the Epstein Files.
English
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
just laid down the best dick and got called the bestest boy for it
GIF
English
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
BritannianSpirit أُعيد تغريده
Israeli terrorist soldiers killed a horse in Gaza on purpose.
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess
An Israeli search and rescue team saving a dog today after its house was damaged by an Iranian ballistic missile. We protect life, while our enemies glorify death.
English