Jake

@SecureAKFuture $5.6 BILLION total throughput and the State of Alaska LOSES MONEY every fucking year supporting this industry. Add insult to injury, our Chinook stocks are being decimated and terminal users bear all the burden in allocation. GTFOH

Listen to you. “Who’s gonna pick the cotton!!?” I dont blame anyone for trying to make a better life for themselves or their children. But illegal immigration suppresses wages for Americans. And limits housing, healthcare, etc. The problem is not the people coming here, the problem is the people hiring them . That’s really where the enforcement should be. Plus— the shitters full. Too many freeloaders already.

I didn’t say she had to be let in. But she should be able to apply for asylum. Lord knows we’re not going to pick our own food or clean our own houses and hotels. We’ll soon find that homes aren’t being built, cows aren’t being milked, and many of jobs are left unfilled because of Trump’s indiscriminate anti-immigrant policy. No worries. When we take over, we’ll create some legislation.

Classic “asylum seeker” here. In such danger and peril that she’s going to wait until Trump leaves office to try to get into the US. 95%+ of the migrants we interviewed at the border from 2021-2024 openly admitted on camera they wanted work/a better life. That’s not asylum.

@DeannaIndiana @BillMelugin_ Shitters full. Find somewhere else.

@BillMelugin_ It’s the American Dream. That’s why all of us are here. That’s why she wants to be here. What the fuck is wrong with that?!

@Grunt2A Well, now I gotta follow

To the large number of you who hit "follow" because of my Planet of the Apes post, this photo is a good representation of my normal content theme If this is going to be an issue just save us both the trouble and unfollow If this picture speaks to you, welcome to the party!

Make IQ tests for SCOTUS justice appointments.

Good morning 🥴

@0hour1 She’s got tricks dude.

Well we know one Supreme Court justice who will steal your wallet at a party.

You're never going to believe why the US can arrest, prosecute, convict and imprison aliens, and even deport them. It's because they are "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." Who knew?

@AlexsDuckCall @PoliceThePolic1 @HighImpactFlix You are correct that driving is not a right but a privilege. Few understand this. Your 4th amendment rights do not just vanish, however, because you are driving. You don’t give them up when you get behind the wheel. Search, seizure, detainment laws are still in place

@GuloGulo666 @PoliceThePolic1 @HighImpactFlix You wrong. Driving isn't a right, it's a privilege and it can be taken away. ...especially, say if you are out driving drunk.

Road pirate tough guys didn’t realize they’d stopped a DUI‑stop veteran who knows DUI checkpoints better than the officers running them Video by: @HighImpactFlix

Another brilliant and profound statement by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — single-handedly lowering the Supreme Court eligibility bar to new lows. How does this have anything to do with birthright citizenship? 🤔

Seems a tad bit problematic that a sworn justice of the Supreme Court is having trouble understanding the concept of ‘allegiance’

🔥🔥Huge! The congressman who submitted the 14th amendment, which concerns birthright citizenship, states that it was never intended to include foreigners. These discussions happened May 30, 1866. The PRESIDENT pro tempore: “The question is on the amendments proposed by the Senator from Michigan, [Mr. Howard.]” Mr. HOWARD: “The first amendment is to section one, declaring that "all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside." I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been so fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. ➡️ This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.” The link to the Library of Congress archive will follow. Enjoy @realDonaldTrump

KBJ判事 「もし私が日本で財布を盗んだら、私は日本の法律の対象になります…ある意味で、それは忠誠です。」 ジョー・バイデンの贈り物 日本も相当だけど、アメリカの方が遥かにやばい状況なのは理解した

🚨Ketanji Brown comparing birthright citizenship to stealing someone's wallet in Japan is one of the most unintelligent things I have ever heard. And I thought her failing to answer "What is a woman" was bad, this tops it! You don’t go to Japan, commit a crime, and suddenly become Japanese… so why are we pretending having a baby here magically makes everything permanent? That logic isn’t just flawed it’s straight tomfoolery 🇺🇸

BREAKING: 94% chance SCOTUS strikes down President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order.

@JamesTate121 Like a magician

Kentanji Brown Jackson is too good for this court. I don’t have a transcript yet but she basically asked: “Didn’t they put birthright citizenship in the constitution in order to avoid this type of debate over who gets to claim a domicile?” And Sauer just stuttered. And then Sonia Sotomayor comes in with the “doesn’t this open the door to the government withdrawing citizenship from people who were born here?” More stuttering.

@AlexsDuckCall @PoliceThePolic1 @HighImpactFlix You’re in the wrong country bub

@PoliceThePolic1 @HighImpactFlix You're a dick. It's a sobriety check point. Why would you be against that?