HYB

207 posts

HYB

HYB

@HYeahBrother

They’re calling it, “hell-yeah-brother-liberalism” and it’s beautiful.

Chicago, IL انضم Aralık 2025
141 يتبع7 المتابعون
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@KeithPowersNYC You are bad at your job - a dog owner
English
0
0
0
50
Keith Powers
Keith Powers@KeithPowersNYC·
Pet Owners: It’s time that we make pet food a little bit cheaper. This week, I introduced new legislation to get rid of the sales tax every time you buy pet food.
English
371
13
164
1.5M
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@aarmlovi @MattBruenig Machines already produce far more than half of all output and income.
English
0
0
0
113
Alex Armlovich
Alex Armlovich@aarmlovi·
If machines eventually produce half or more of all output & income, mediating all that capital income through welfare checks could feel like subjugation May need something more like a @MattBruenig-tweaked Meidner Plan with direct citizen ownership as shareholders
James Medlock@jdcmedlock

It’s all well and good for tech leaders to endorse UBI. But it feels convenient to only focus on a distant political prospect. The GOP, right now, is doing reverse-UBI (work requirements on SNAP). It’d be nice to hear more objections to that.

English
7
4
63
41K
Marcus🦬
Marcus🦬@mhaberling·
@Robotbeat If you would just make a uranium salt water rocket, you dont need liquid hydrogen at all. There are no downsides!*
English
1
0
5
179
Robotbeat🗽 ➐
Robotbeat🗽 ➐@Robotbeat·
Nuclear thermal rockets are SHOCKINGLY bad compared to what you’d expect based on Isp alone. Because you have to use hydrogen to get an engine that lasts and gets a decent Isp, and hydrogen is the worst propellant ever in terms of density and nearly the worst for boiling point.
sadernoheart@sadernoheart

Nuclear Propulsion Rockets could be the end game. Clearly better than Chemical Propulsion Rockets considering nuclear fission releases a million times more energy per kg than chemical bonds. Too bad they have a reactor engineering problem limiting they're mass flow rate(power density). It's been years though. Have they solved this yet and probably just haven't made it public?

English
24
5
209
18.1K
Franky
Franky@_FrankyPi·
@HYeahBrother @PebMet1 @elonmusk I see you completely missed the entire point of what I said. Maybe you won't once you see what this haphazard plan does to the program.
English
1
0
1
22
PebMets
PebMets@PebMet1·
This is a fact. If we listened to all of the @elonmusk and starship supporters who said we should scrap SLS and Orion for Starship, we would still be waiting for a mission to the moon instead of the 2 which have already successfully completed.
English
16
32
371
7.8K
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@_FrankyPi @PebMet1 @elonmusk The program already relies on not using SLS for creating free base, supplying it, and doing crew rotations at a healthy rate. SLS is worse than pointless
English
1
0
0
15
Franky
Franky@_FrankyPi·
@HYeahBrother @PebMet1 @elonmusk You can't have a base without astronauts and without all the infrastructure that is needed to support these long duration activities in orbit. Removing Gateway and crippling SLS is asinine and unless it's reversed, it will backfire massively, even risking cancelation of Artemis.
English
1
0
0
51
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@TommyLundn @AndrewPerpetua have you seen this trend? If so, do you think it’s location based? (More strikes deeper where Russians are more likely to be in groups)
English
0
0
1
192
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@spencerdavis_tx Where did you get that $100,000 number from? Did you make it up? You claimed it cost $1 billion to build, which is obviously untrue, so I assume you made up this number too.
English
0
0
1
156
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@TomMoyerUT These super fast chargers are not as expensive as people think when you consider fewer need to be installed to achieve the same charging throughput. Instead of seeing 12 300kW chargers installed at a location, we’ll see 6 300kW and 2 1 MW stalls.
English
0
0
2
76
Tom Moyer 🇺🇸
Tom Moyer 🇺🇸@TomMoyerUT·
Summary of my argument: Five-minute EV charging will be available to you. It will come at a cost. In the US, drivers will generally not choose to pay that cost. People will discover that that feature isn’t actually very important. Ubiquitous, reliable charging *is* important.
Tom Moyer 🇺🇸@TomMoyerUT

Unpopular opinion: This is a party trick and won’t be used much because the infrastructure to deliver 1.5 MW is expensive. Having ubiquitous, reliable charging is a lot more important than cutting the charge time from 15 minutes to 5 minutes.

English
53
15
155
19.4K
Zane Hengsperger
Zane Hengsperger@zanehengsperger·
elon less than 5 years ago was worried about bankruptcy btw
Zane Hengsperger tweet media
English
7
4
121
6.5K
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@WilliamJosephh @sam_ess604 LVT does not apply to improvements and therefore does not discourage building things.
English
0
0
0
38
oh god not again
oh god not again@WilliamJosephh·
@sam_ess604 Not familiar with Georgism but what is the fundamental difference between a municipal property tax and a LVT?
English
2
0
7
6.5K
Sam 🇨🇦 🔰
Sam 🇨🇦 🔰@sam_ess604·
>be econ student but not braindead >read Das Kapital >realize marx spotted a real problem but aimed at the wrong target >workers vs capital wasn’t the full picture >land quietly siphoning everything in the background >learn Georgism >oh >rent isn’t just "paying a landlord" >it’s economic rent >unearned value from location, infrastructure, society itself >city grows >nothing changes about the dirt >land price doubles anyway >owner gets rich doing literally nothing >wages go up? >land rent goes up faster >productivity gains? >capitalized into land prices >UBI? >lol landlords already priced it in >argue about capitalism vs socialism online >meanwhile both ignore the same leak in the system >private sector builds stuff >public sector builds infrastructure >landowners capture both >see rent control debate >price ceiling on symptoms >ignore the asset bubble underneath >construction slows >everyone acts surprised >hear "greedy corporations" >check balance sheets >most profits normal >check land values >oh >understand why cities like Vancouver feel impossible >it’s not just wages >it’s not just policy >it’s land absorbing everything >realize taxation isn’t the issue >what you tax is >tax labour? >you punish production >tax capital? >you slow investment >tax land? >you can’t move it >you can’t hide it >you don’t reduce supply >land value tax clicks >capture the unearned >leave wages and production alone >housing gets cheaper to hold >speculation dies >building actually makes sense again >stop arguing ideology >start closing the rent-seeking loop
Handre@Handre

>be social studies student >professor assigns Das Kapital >Marx explains how capitalism exploits workers >makes total sense >capitalism = bad, socialism = good >graduate with $87,000 in student debt >can't find job that pays living wage >blame greedy corporations >apply for government job >get hired at Department of Education >spend 8 hours daily in bureaucratic meetings >produce nothing of value >complain about private sector efficiency on X >vote for politicians promising free healthcare >support rent control to fight housing crisis >wonder why no new apartments get built The same students who read Marx's theory of exploitation never question why government jobs exist or why their "public service" requires extracting wealth from productive workers. They rail against capitalist surplus value while collecting paychecks funded by taxation—the ultimate extraction..

English
99
238
2.9K
402.6K
Alex Almeida
Alex Almeida@AlexAlmeida2020·
For those of who came up analyzing insurgencies in MENA it’s a bit of mental shift to start thinking in WWII or Cold War ‘grand chessboard’ terms but a necessary one I think. Takes the right frame of mind to really appreciate the global multi-theater scale of what’s happening.
Alex Almeida@AlexAlmeida2020

I get the sense that for obvious reasons they’ve been very cautious about publicly making the argument that this was an opportune moment to take Iran off the board ahead of possible Taiwan contingency in the late 2020s, but it’s a strong argument that makes sound strategic sense.

English
5
5
32
14.1K
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@alanthefisher @mike_NY_3800 @mattparlmer Data centers require so little in terms of public services, they can pay reduced rates and still be net payers. That’s actually the main reason localities fight over attracting them.
English
0
0
4
67
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@Eric_Erins IMTS uses it. The view catches people by surprise especially after they’ve been indoors all week.
English
0
0
1
1.2K
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@Ed453164711 @AlanMCole @scottlincicome They lied and said there are no such penalties. They claim that they don’t penalize links, but do penalize posts that bring users offsite. So they admit they penalize links even though they claim otherwise.
English
0
0
0
43
Alan Cole
Alan Cole@AlanMCole·
Dumb. The value of the link is in backing up the claim. The claim can often be backed up from a NYT/WSJ/Bloomberg headline alone. But it’s also a signal you’re willing to let the many power users who do have subscriptions investigate the story further. Dumb dumb dumb.
Nikita Bier@nikitabier

@NateSilver538 It’s paywalled. If only 0.1% of users can derive value from the content, it will organically rank lower.

English
41
58
1.2K
64K
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@nobodyknows2322 Prices for Paris real estate are going up. You don’t understand how to measure revealed preference in housing.
English
0
0
0
31
HYB
HYB@HYeahBrother·
@pooptartgav This is why I worry about Martha Stewart. Happy she’s made it this long.
English
0
0
1
286
gav
gav@pooptartgav·
There was one waspy Catholic family in American history and they have a curse that gets them all killed in odd ways
English
98
546
19.7K
834.9K