Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
I will literally pay money for this. Someone find this guy and tell him to hit me up.
English
Jason Bed
11.6K posts
Jason Bed
@JasonBed
🇺🇸 Sarcastic owner of an increasing list of unpopular opinions 🇺🇸 I will always be there for the valiant hearts I see in those I follow. 🇺🇸 #ifbap
انضم Temmuz 2008
4.2K يتبع3.9K المتابعون
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
Each. Dot. Represents. 100. Migrants.
This is what an invasion looks like:
English
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
Nobody could figure out why the abandoned Hendricks apple orchard suddenly bloomed in April 2019. The trees hadn't produced fruit in eleven years. County agriculture office sent two inspectors. They found sixty thousand honeybees working the property - a massive colony that had escaped from Tomás Vega's apiary three miles south. Tomás had reported the swarm missing in March. He expected them dead. Instead they'd colonized the hollow barn on the Hendricks lot and cross-pollinated every surviving tree. That October, the orchard produced twenty-two tons of Cortland apples. The Hendricks family offered Tomás a permanent lease. He moved his entire operation there the following spring.
English
@TuckerCarlson Man how much does Qatar pay? Just asking I might be down depending lol
English
Why would an Israeli soldier use a sledgehammer to smash the face of Jesus? Because there are a lot of people in Israel who hate Christianity above all. How can American evangelical leaders support this?
English
@NewJerusalemAI @DorneSylas @SCorundar @BlackDumpling @theblessedsalt I'm talking about your hilarious backpedaling towards the superficial face of the issue now that you went all in on this topic and know you can't engage on any depth but yea I guess you're tapped out, ok buddy.
English
@JasonBed @DorneSylas @SCorundar @BlackDumpling @theblessedsalt What the fuck are you talking about? I'm talking about vandalism, that like 90% of your friends did in highschool.
Who the fuck is talking about rape? You people are honestly fucking insane.
English
This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory.
Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies.
(Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)
My moms caregiver@mymomcare
People who have lived in the country understand this!
English
@NewJerusalemAI @DorneSylas @SCorundar @BlackDumpling @theblessedsalt You'd say the same about a woman walking around in shorts who's packing heat. Your defense would be "she was tempting me and asking for an altercation but didn't tell me she could protect herself"
English
Reinforcing the mailbox is fine, its a good idea. Hiding the concrete inside so that it looks like a regular mailbox is a boobytrap.
They are hiding the concrete to trick the vandals into trying to attack it and breaking their arms.
Kids hit these mailboxes when they drive by with cars. They are going at high speeds and leaning out the windows. Suddenly hitting concrete at high speed could be deadly.
Its a dumb thing to do. Don't hide the concrete. Put it on the outside.
English
@HorrorGorl lol found someone who was educated at "the learing center" ☝️
English
Police don’t prevent crime. They show up after it happens. Crime prevention starts with funding social programs and creating opportunity.
English
@AiNine9000 @SCShipyards @TRMirCat I feel for ya, sister. Maybe one day someone will cover the stonework in an inflatable... 😂
English
@SCShipyards @TRMirCat Every mailbox in my neighborhood is set inside a big stonework base but sadly it's a gated neighborhood with zero crime so I don't get to watch vandals slam into stone pillars.
English
Just when I think I understand humies...
The concrete shell inside a mailbox damages no one except someone doing something considered socially, morally, & legally wrong.
So... don't do that.
Further, it enforces the "two poisoned Skittles in a bowl of normal Skittles" puzzle.
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt
This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)
English
@NewJerusalemAI @RejuvenatedRex @DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_ and thanks for being the living embodiment of what you fear in your bio statement
English
@RejuvenatedRex @DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_ Thanks for being honest about your bloodlust psychopath.
English
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society.
Goes like this:
If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with...
The aggressor because he got hurt?
Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor?
You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something.
But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy.
I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources.
They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it.
That is the sign of a rotten soul.
Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself.
I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody.
We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt
This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)
English
@DesertCity66 @Devon_Eriksen_ Nah, you just value destruction. Anything that disincentivizes people from acts of destruction irritates you because the obliteration and reduction machine must moan on, and how can it without willing and unimpeded hobgoblins to enact said destruction?
English
@Devon_Eriksen_ All this sephiroth-posting just to say you value out-group folks less than your mailbox. The punishment for vandalism being a crippling injury puts you in the barbaric camp, you realize? Of course you don’t, lol
English
This is the disgusting libtard guy who would tell women they must "advertise" if they are armed enough to defend themselves from rape (instead of conceal carrying) because otherwise the criminals would have too hard a time planning and getting what they want.
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt
> “Why can’t I fortify my mailbox??” You absolutely can, but this isn’t mere fortifying. This is sneakily hiding the fortification to cause disproportionate harm to the vandal. Fortify in a way that advertises the fortification and you’re on solid ground.
English
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
Never, in the history of history itself, has a judge looked down at the prisoner in the dock and declared "I sentence you to Concrete Mailbox".
Why not?
Because Concrete Mailbox is not a punishment, you factory-defective lawn gnome.
It's a mailbox. Made from concrete.
If you hurt yourself with it because you can't be bothered to learn the laws of physics in your own damn universe, that is a you problem.
I am not obligated to suffer harm in order to protect you from a stupid action you might someday take.
Of course, what you are really doing is engaging in the favorite marxist pastime of "pretending not to understand things".
What you are pretending not to understand is the difference between consequences and punishment.
For example, if you are a lazy marxist, and you won't work or do anything for anyone else, you'll be broke. This is not a conspiracy to deprive you of stuff. It is simply the consequence of you being selfish.
You know this. But you pretend not to because you hope that if you confuse the issue enough, you can get suggestible people to give you free stuff.
And in this case, you want to protect vandals at the expense of people who own mailboxes, because you are more likely to vandalize a mailbox than to own one, therefore you fail the Mailbox Test by sympathizing with the vandal.
Desert Citizen@DesertCity66
@Devon_Eriksen_ All this sephiroth-posting just to say you value out-group folks less than your mailbox. The punishment for vandalism being a crippling injury puts you in the barbaric camp, you realize? Of course you don’t, lol
English
@theblessedsalt I think this argument is akin to concealed carry. I don’t let anyone know if I am carrying so that they cannot properly determine their risk assessment, because their ability to do that endangers me.
English
This is very sweet. I'm not sure if he's pulling from DH Lawrence or something... that would be very Spencer anyways tho
Spencer A. Klavan@SpencerKlavan
It’s a little unclear what it means when the Psalms say that God has “established strength from out of the mouths of very babes,” but I’m convinced this is it. Language means putting the world in rational order, understanding universals and particulars, grasping that *this* man fills a role called “dada” which, you will one day learn, other men fill for other children. In other words it means internalizing the principles that hold the universe together—principles like one and may and time and number, the foundations of music and of physics alike. And see how all this is drawn out from within into speech, the very foundations of heaven and earth coaxed tenderly from mind to lungs, across the teeth, into the very air, to form a shape the meaning of which is love. And for this the universe was founded, and in this the universe is made anew each day, with unfathomable might, the power that ignited a septillion nuclear reactors in the sky, drawn out again—again!—from the mouths of very babes.
English
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
Jason Bed أُعيد تغريده
