ุชุบุฑูุฏุฉ ู
ุซุจุชุฉ
"Nobody Owns Real Madrid. Nobody Owns Barcelona."
Why Spanish clubs have presidents and English clubs have owners
Roman Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003. The Glazers bought Manchester United in 2005. Sheikh Mansour bought Manchester City in 2008.
In England, a football club is a business. Someone owns it. Someone can sell it. Someone can run it into the ground if they want.
Now go to Spain and ask โ who owns Real Madrid?
Nobody. And everybody.
That's not a riddle. That's literally how it works.
When clubs like Real Madrid and Barcelona were founded in the early 1900s, they weren't set up as businesses. They were set up as community institutions. Fans paid an annual subscription to become what they called a Socio โ which roughly translates to "partner."
As a Socio, you weren't just buying a season ticket. You were a part-owner. You had a vote. You had a say. All profits stayed within the club โ no dividends for outside shareholders, no billionaire siphoning money elsewhere.
Everything went back into the institution.
This is why the president exists. The Socios elect the club president every four years.
He campaigns like a politician. He makes promises. He can be voted out. He answers to the people โ not to a boardroom in New York or Abu Dhabi.
Now here's where it almost all collapsed.
By the 1990s, many Spanish clubs were drowning in debt. The government stepped in and passed a law forcing clubs to convert into private limited companies โ essentially forcing them to get owners like English clubs.
Most Spanish clubs had no choice. They converted. But there was one exception.
Clubs that could prove they had been profitable for five consecutive years were allowed to keep the Socio model.
Only four clubs in all of Spain qualified โ Real Madrid, Barcelona, Athletic Bilbao, and Osasuna.
Four clubs that got to keep football in the hands of their fans.
In practice that means no individual or company can buy Real Madrid or Barcelona. You cannot walk in with a billion pounds and take over.
When Florentino wants to stay in power, he has to go back to the people and convince them. When Laporta makes bad decisions, fans can organise against him. There is actual accountability.
Contrast that with the Premier League โ where an owner can buy your club, drain the finances, and you as a fan have zero legal power to stop them.
But the Socio model isn't perfect either. While PSG and Manchester City receive unlimited financial backing, Barcelona has had to navigate serious financial crises while staying true to the model.
The debt Barcelona accumulated recently is a direct result of spending like a PLC-owned club while being structured like a cooperative.
You get democracy. But you also get exposure.
In England the door was always open for full takeovers โ which is why today you have American owners, Middle Eastern states, and hedge funds controlling the biggest clubs on the planet. While across in Spain, the two most powerful clubs in world football are technically owned by their fans.
Neither model is perfect. But one of them means a billionaire can never wake up one morning and sell your club from under you.
๐ A new football story every single day. If this one taught you something, follow and retweet โ your timeline needs this.
๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅท๐ฝ@LastOneQuiet
Why do Spanish clubs have presidents and English clubs owners?
English
