Matt

@voiceofcohen2 Not top 100 according to @MLBNetwork

Also, Nico Hoerner is one of the best players in Major League Baseball.

@valkyries Easier to play on the Valks than UConn

A little something we like to call foreshadowing 😌 Now the work begins. Welcome to the Bay, @c_ducharme3!

@tcuwbb *your senior year

Wanna play in The W? Come to TCU. #GoFrogs

@TheDamDocta @Underdog The statement is untrue.. unless you want to twist the statement to fit under a different context. If you want to do that, go ahead. I work night shift .. so enjoy your day. I’m getting some sleep.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog You said the statement presented was not true. Did Aces team have back to back #1 picks? Yes. It happened twice. The same team gained success within 3 years of their set of b2b #1 picks. Your saying b2b2b #1 picks are not the same as b2b #1 picks doesn’t make the statement untrue

Every team that has had back-to-back #1 overall picks in WNBA history went on to win a championship within 3 years

@TheDamDocta @Underdog Any debate 2 people are saying they are right. I have an “ego issue” , but you are perfect and are arguing on the right side. Plum/Aja-No Aja/Young-Yes Sucking for a 3rd straight year doesn’t mean Plum/Aja gets a pass. I can’t spell it out for you any better.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog Lmao you got an ego issue about being wrong man. It’s not a big deal. A second set of #1 picks won in within 3 years. It’s not an untrue statement. Hypotheticals, misguided etc etc, does not make that statement untrue dude 🤣😭

@TheDamDocta @Underdog Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean my logic isn’t correct. My hypothetical shows how misguided the other way of looking at it is. Not my fault Plum and A’Ja didn’t accomplish the feat. It’s ok that they needed a 3rd #1 pick to get it done.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean the logic doesn’t hold. Is there a nuance sure but your hypothetical hasn’t happened. This 1 instance of 3 #1 picks did. W/ Aces 2nd attempt at getting b2b #1 picks, within 3 yrs they got a 3 ring. You not liking it doesn’t change that.

@TheDamDocta @Underdog That’s a dumb way of thinking. If the Wings got the first pick every year until 2047, then win the title in 2049 they’d still meet the criteria with that way of bending the accomplishment.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog It doesn’t change that logic though. “Every team that has had back-to-back #1 [] picks… went on to win a [ring] within 3 yrs” Did they do it w/ KP, No. Did they receive b2b #1 picks, again? Yes. Therefore they’re still a team who won a ring after b2b #1 picks & won within 3yrs.

@brawadis HCA in every game.

Being the 7 seed is the worst spot to be. You have literally NO CHANCE of moving up in the play-in, if you win you just stay at 7. But if you lose, you drop to 8 or out of the playoffs altogether lol

@The_Sports_Dr1 @tyler_rucker We got some lottery luck before and picked Patrick Williams!!

@tyler_rucker What about this… bulls finally get some lottery luck and pick #9 lands in the top 4…

With Portland win, looks as if Chicago Bulls should get another first rounder... So here's a draft chaos Hypothetical for fun... (order not set obviously) Chicago offers #9 & #15 pick to Sacramento for #5. Who Says No?

@WindyCityBearss @trailblazers I don’t think that will happen.. but don’t blame you for dreaming big! Enjoy your playoff hoops 🏀

@Matthbbbch @trailblazers We winning it all and the pick won’t mean shit anyways 😀

THE PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS ARE HEADED TO THE PLAYOFFS!!!!!

EVERYONE SEND YOUR REACTIONS TO TONIGHT'S WIN!

@RyanSchlanser @tankathon Good Memory 🧠

@Matthbbbch @tankathon Wasn't that the pick they got from Tyrus Thomas?

Reminder: Bulls only get the Blazers' 1st if they make it out of the Play-In

@BobbyMarks42 Possibly 1 and 15 🤷🏻‍♂️

With Portland advancing to the playoffs, Chicago will now have their first-round pick. No. 9 and possibly No. 15

@trailblazers Thank You Portland!! Now the Bulls can mess up 2 1st rounders!! 🙏🏼

EVERYONE CATCH YOUR BREATH THE PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS ARE PLAYOFF BOUND!!!! DO YOU HEAR ME I SAID PLAYOFF BOUND!!!!

@HoernerMVP What an idiotic tweet

We have Matt Shaw as our backup first basemen

@TheDamDocta @Underdog It is inaccurate. You don’t get to remove Plum because they didn’t get it done.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog Well it doesn’t make it inaccurate if their last two number picks won within 3 years lol. If you remove plum, it still doesn’t change the point.

@HawkeyeBBFan Got to get her name right if she’s your fav!

@ldawgplace @Underdog You seemed stressed about this conversation. Go find some real problems, instead of being mad that I’m right.

@Matthbbbch @Underdog You’re playing semantics , take Kelsey plum off its the same shit dude go find real problems in world to stress about