Campbell Mitchell
55.3K posts
Campbell Mitchell
@Negscratch
“Fain would I fly the haunts of men, I seek to shun, not hate mankind, My breast requires the sullen glen, Whose gloom may suit a darken’d mind.”
UK انضم Haziran 2010
803 يتبع891 المتابعون
The Islamic @MayorofLondon @SadiqKhan calling yet more attacks on London’s jewish community “perverse” is what is truly perverse.
A man who has just hosted the largest communion of ideological dominance in the central square of Britains capital city.
English
Liz Truss wrote “Ten Years To Save The West”.
Matt took ten hours to write his book apparently.
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ
The Left are having a meltdown about Suicide of a Nation -- cherry-picking, misrepresenting, and hate-bombing the Amazon reviews. Why? Because they think they own and control the public debate. Their default mode whenever a book/thinker comes along that dismantles their worldview is to try & discredit it and attack the person, not the argument. Only, it won't work this time. There is a reason Suicide of a Nation is Number 3 on Amazon and it's struck a chord with so many. Because people see through the gaslighting and want to be told THE TRUTH about what is really happening to THEIR OWN COUNTRY, and their own people. Everything in this book is based on official, UK census data and the very same projections that are used by the Office for National Statistics and expert demographers. Every single person who knows the data knows that everything in this book is correct - even if they would rather you not know about it, or talk about it. The Left don't want you to read it, they don't want you to know what is in this book, because they do not want you to know what is happening around you. They do not want you to know the truth. Which is why they work overtime to try and deflect & discredit anything that challenges their worldview. "Is it really true what you say about this one school?", they ask, knowing full well it is. "Should we really care about the fact that some 5 million people in England cannot speak English or do not speak it as their main language?", they ask, knowing full well this is a major problem. They are constantly trying to gaslight you. It really is that simple. I worked in the universities for 20 years; I saw the strategy up close. Only, unlike others I refuse to be pushed aside. I refuse to let them dominate the public debate. Which, by the way, is why I did not want this book to be published by a mainstream publisher. I could easily have gone down this road, having written two national bestsellers. But I knew they would censor what I say, they would try to control and narrow the debate. This is why I deliberately stepped outside the narrow, stifling Groupthink, the Overton Window. And this is why Suicide of a Nation is now selling out - everywhere. So here's a challenge. Ignore the losers on the Left who are trying to control and censor you once again, read it for yourself, and make up your own mind. Matt amazon.co.uk/Suicide-Nation…
English
A response to my critics.
Suicide of a Nation is clearly becoming a major book & I'm DELIGHTED by the debate it's sparked.
This is why I wrote it. People deserve to know the truth about what is happening in their own country.
I also find myself in the curious position of watching Suicide of a Nation be criticised by people on both the Left, many of whom have clearly not read it, & people further to my Right, who oppose my support for Reform.
I will deal with all this together.
1. Research, stats & evidence
All the research, stats, data come from the official 2021 UK census data. The projections are calibrated to the 2022 Office for National Statistics national population projections, ensuring consistency with national trends.
I believe this is the most systematic, sophisticated look at the demographic revolution unfolding in Britain that we have to date.
To be clear, Suicide of a Nation is also a trade book, intended for a mass audience. It is not like books written by academics that are typically only read by a few dozen or a few hundred people.
It is designed to reach tens of thousands, which it is now doing, to try and help shift the Overton Window.
If you want all the detailed assumptions, analysis, & modelling behind the book you can read them here: shorturl.at/d3Hg8
Or if you want to look at the key trends in more detail you can see them in our Substack this morning:
shorturl.at/LLBeS
2. Substack, links, and footnotes
Trade books by their nature have minimal footnotes.
The aim is to inspire a mass readership. Having spent 20 years in the universities, I wanted to write a trade book. Hence the lack of footnotes. If you want the data detail on the trends see the paper above.
I do link to several of my Substack articles because, as it happens, with the exception of David Coleman, I am one of the only people who has run demographic projections at this level.
You can read it here: shorturl.at/Gij6S.
Ditto my discussion in the book of Muslim attitudes, Reform voters, and the economic costs of net migration.
Nobody else is writing about these issues as we are at mattgoodwin.org hence me citing those pieces. I see no problem with this. I am proud of our work.
Academics cite their own work all the time. It just so happens this time around they disagree with my work!
3. AI school census data
Footnote 8 includes a reference to school and nursery data via AI which was then cross-checked with the real dataset (available here: shorturl.at/KlFVm.
I see no issue obtaining datasets via AI so long as they are cross-checked with the original source (above).
Hence why I include the reference.
This school census data shows, clearly, nearly 1 in 4 primary pupils & nearly 1 in 3 nursery pupils no longer speak English as their main language.
I attach the screenshot.
In Bradford, the example, nearly 40% of state primary children do not speak English as their main language (see screenshot).
In some primary schools in Bradford, 98% of pupils speak 'English as an additional language'.
Nationally, as I talk about in the book, and as GB News revealed last year, there are now 2,000 schools where English is no longer the main language for most pupils
In 2 primary schools, not a single child has English as their native tongue. In 107 schools, 9 in 10 pupils do not speak English at home. In 2,309 schools in England, English is no longer the first language.
And across the country, 1.8 million children, 1 in 5, do not speak English as their main language (see here shorturl.at/KXROf)
It is also now fact, as I say in the book, to have schools in the Midlands with more than 30 languages spoken: shorturl.at/OfyNj
I notice my critics ignore all these statistics, as well as the obvious problems this creates in the classroom, for example -> shorturl.at/6TJYz
The left-wing claim that this does not create problems is ludicrous. Research by scholars such as Strand and Hessel finds that pupils who speak English as an additional (not main) language explains 22% of the variation in their educational achievement, compared to 3-4% that is statistically explained by things like gender or free school meals (as a measure of poverty).
So, unlike the Left, I think this is a major problem and I make no apology for saying so.
We should have a shared language. Bilingualism undermines our shared culture & nation. Mass immigration is weakening our educational system.
4. Solutions and prognosis
Some argue the book offers no solution. I disagree. I am clear throughout.
End mass migration. Exit the ECHR. Repeal the HRA. End welfare & social housing subsidies for non-Brits. End two-tier multiculturalism. Crack down on Islamism. Invest in Pro-family policies. Deport illegal migrants, foreign criminals & those who do not make a net fiscal contribution to the UK economy. Reassert our free speech. Scrap definitions of 'Islamophobia'. Abolish non-crime hate incidents.
Where I depart from critics further to my Right is in opposing vague and ill-defined talk about "mass deportations" or "remigration", which often appear to mean "deport anybody who isn't White", or "deport British nationals".
I reject this - politically, morally, ethically.
I simply do not think it is right, possible, politically appealing to an election-winning majority, or in tune with our political culture. I also do not think the Americans cheering on other parties understand the nuances in our political culture.
5. Intellectual lineage.
The book implicitly nods, throughout, to the work of Roger Scruton, Eric Kaufmann, Anthony Smith, Walker Connor, Douglas Murray (subtitle), all of whom have warned through speeches, podcasts, e-mails, and articles about the loss of a historic majority group.
This is deliberate.
Left-wingers who argue, for example, that Smith or Connor did not warn about the loss of a historic core are simply not reading their work, or being disingenuous.
The title of the book is a specific nod to Arthur Koestler's Suicide of a Nation, a left-wing account of Britain's decline in the postwar era.
My book, in contrast, is obviously a national conservative/right-wing take on Britain's decline.
Sometimes, you don't need to state your influences because they are so obvious - at least to people who read books.
6. Publishing in 2026
Some people have asked why I did not publish with a mainstream publisher given my past books were with Penguin, Oxford, Cambridge, Routledge, etc., and I wrote two Sunday Times bestsellers (now three?)
The answer is because I believe the publishers have been ideologically captured and no longer allow genuine free speech and debate.
Having gone through mainstream publishers, I know for a fact this book would never have been published or would have been edited and diluted to the point at which it says nothing interesting or truthful at all.
Anybody who is a serious author, who has gone through the editorial process, knows this to be true.
The reality, in 2026, is if you have a profile and a large Substack you no longer need mainstream publishers.
You no longer need to be controlled by Gatekeepers.
This is a positive development. And in many respects I hope that given it's obvious success (top 5 on Amazon) Suicide of a Nation will encourage others to break with establishment publishing. This is what we need to do if we are serious about taking on the institutions.
Lastly, my thanks to the left-wing trolls and resentful, bitter, unsuccessful former academic colleagues who are coordinating an attack on the Amazon Reviews page. They are helping drive the algorithm, ensuring this book receives the attention it deserves and is read by many, many more people.
I thank you for this.
Best wishes, Matt
p.s. buy the book below or via Waterstones, Blackwell's, Foyles, etc (Amazon is now regularly running out such is the demand)
amazon.co.uk/Suicide-Nation…
English
@andytwelves @Elle_Ham06 @GoodwinMJ You are behaving brilliantly- calm, methodical and polite.
MattGPT, on the other hand, is reacting like a whiny bitch to your coherent and well-researched points.
English
Hi @GoodwinMJ - I’ve read your response in full.
You haven’t explained why you or MattGPT has made up multiple quotes attributed to figures like Cicero, Hayek, Burnham, Scruton, and Walker Connor, and why they cannot be verified in any primary texts or reliable secondary sources.
You haven’t addressed the specific claims about schools, e.g. the Bradford classroom example, the supposed BBC West Midlands report, or the Ofsted quote, all of which appear to be either untraceable or misrepresented.
Simply citing general EAL statistics doesn’t validate your specific anecdotal claims that don’t exist.
You also haven’t engaged with the core issue around EAL itself. “English as an Additional Language” does not mean pupils cannot speak English or are unable to learn, and all the Ofsted reports of the schools you vaguely referenced consistently show strong progress by Year 6. Presenting this as evidence of systemic breakdown is objectively misleading and wrong.
On migration figures, polling, and even basic political facts (e.g. Boris being in opposition in 2019), there are clear falsehoods that you haven’t corrected or clarified.
I'd be really keen to have this discussion live with you, either on your show on @GBNEWS, the @PoliticsJOE_UK podcast, or a third broadcaster - or are you too afraid to have an open debate?
Your response is embarrassing.
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ
A response to my critics. Suicide of a Nation is clearly becoming a major book & I'm DELIGHTED by the debate it's sparked. This is why I wrote it. People deserve to know the truth about what is happening in their own country. I also find myself in the curious position of watching Suicide of a Nation be criticised by people on both the Left, many of whom have clearly not read it, & people further to my Right, who oppose my support for Reform. I will deal with all this together. 1. Research, stats & evidence All the research, stats, data come from the official 2021 UK census data. The projections are calibrated to the 2022 Office for National Statistics national population projections, ensuring consistency with national trends. I believe this is the most systematic, sophisticated look at the demographic revolution unfolding in Britain that we have to date. To be clear, Suicide of a Nation is also a trade book, intended for a mass audience. It is not like books written by academics that are typically only read by a few dozen or a few hundred people. It is designed to reach tens of thousands, which it is now doing, to try and help shift the Overton Window. If you want all the detailed assumptions, analysis, & modelling behind the book you can read them here: shorturl.at/d3Hg8 Or if you want to look at the key trends in more detail you can see them in our Substack this morning: shorturl.at/LLBeS 2. Substack, links, and footnotes Trade books by their nature have minimal footnotes. The aim is to inspire a mass readership. Having spent 20 years in the universities, I wanted to write a trade book. Hence the lack of footnotes. If you want the data detail on the trends see the paper above. I do link to several of my Substack articles because, as it happens, with the exception of David Coleman, I am one of the only people who has run demographic projections at this level. You can read it here: shorturl.at/Gij6S. Ditto my discussion in the book of Muslim attitudes, Reform voters, and the economic costs of net migration. Nobody else is writing about these issues as we are at mattgoodwin.org hence me citing those pieces. I see no problem with this. I am proud of our work. Academics cite their own work all the time. It just so happens this time around they disagree with my work! 3. AI school census data Footnote 8 includes a reference to school and nursery data via AI which was then cross-checked with the real dataset (available here: shorturl.at/KlFVm. I see no issue obtaining datasets via AI so long as they are cross-checked with the original source (above). Hence why I include the reference. This school census data shows, clearly, nearly 1 in 4 primary pupils & nearly 1 in 3 nursery pupils no longer speak English as their main language. I attach the screenshot. In Bradford, the example, nearly 40% of state primary children do not speak English as their main language (see screenshot). In some primary schools in Bradford, 98% of pupils speak 'English as an additional language'. Nationally, as I talk about in the book, and as GB News revealed last year, there are now 2,000 schools where English is no longer the main language for most pupils In 2 primary schools, not a single child has English as their native tongue. In 107 schools, 9 in 10 pupils do not speak English at home. In 2,309 schools in England, English is no longer the first language. And across the country, 1.8 million children, 1 in 5, do not speak English as their main language (see here shorturl.at/KXROf) It is also now fact, as I say in the book, to have schools in the Midlands with more than 30 languages spoken: shorturl.at/OfyNj I notice my critics ignore all these statistics, as well as the obvious problems this creates in the classroom, for example -> shorturl.at/6TJYz The left-wing claim that this does not create problems is ludicrous. Research by scholars such as Strand and Hessel finds that pupils who speak English as an additional (not main) language explains 22% of the variation in their educational achievement, compared to 3-4% that is statistically explained by things like gender or free school meals (as a measure of poverty). So, unlike the Left, I think this is a major problem and I make no apology for saying so. We should have a shared language. Bilingualism undermines our shared culture & nation. Mass immigration is weakening our educational system. 4. Solutions and prognosis Some argue the book offers no solution. I disagree. I am clear throughout. End mass migration. Exit the ECHR. Repeal the HRA. End welfare & social housing subsidies for non-Brits. End two-tier multiculturalism. Crack down on Islamism. Invest in Pro-family policies. Deport illegal migrants, foreign criminals & those who do not make a net fiscal contribution to the UK economy. Reassert our free speech. Scrap definitions of 'Islamophobia'. Abolish non-crime hate incidents. Where I depart from critics further to my Right is in opposing vague and ill-defined talk about "mass deportations" or "remigration", which often appear to mean "deport anybody who isn't White", or "deport British nationals". I reject this - politically, morally, ethically. I simply do not think it is right, possible, politically appealing to an election-winning majority, or in tune with our political culture. I also do not think the Americans cheering on other parties understand the nuances in our political culture. 5. Intellectual lineage. The book implicitly nods, throughout, to the work of Roger Scruton, Eric Kaufmann, Anthony Smith, Walker Connor, Douglas Murray (subtitle), all of whom have warned through speeches, podcasts, e-mails, and articles about the loss of a historic majority group. This is deliberate. Left-wingers who argue, for example, that Smith or Connor did not warn about the loss of a historic core are simply not reading their work, or being disingenuous. The title of the book is a specific nod to Arthur Koestler's Suicide of a Nation, a left-wing account of Britain's decline in the postwar era. My book, in contrast, is obviously a national conservative/right-wing take on Britain's decline. Sometimes, you don't need to state your influences because they are so obvious - at least to people who read books. 6. Publishing in 2026 Some people have asked why I did not publish with a mainstream publisher given my past books were with Penguin, Oxford, Cambridge, Routledge, etc., and I wrote two Sunday Times bestsellers (now three?) The answer is because I believe the publishers have been ideologically captured and no longer allow genuine free speech and debate. Having gone through mainstream publishers, I know for a fact this book would never have been published or would have been edited and diluted to the point at which it says nothing interesting or truthful at all. Anybody who is a serious author, who has gone through the editorial process, knows this to be true. The reality, in 2026, is if you have a profile and a large Substack you no longer need mainstream publishers. You no longer need to be controlled by Gatekeepers. This is a positive development. And in many respects I hope that given it's obvious success (top 5 on Amazon) Suicide of a Nation will encourage others to break with establishment publishing. This is what we need to do if we are serious about taking on the institutions. Lastly, my thanks to the left-wing trolls and resentful, bitter, unsuccessful former academic colleagues who are coordinating an attack on the Amazon Reviews page. They are helping drive the algorithm, ensuring this book receives the attention it deserves and is read by many, many more people. I thank you for this. Best wishes, Matt p.s. buy the book below or via Waterstones, Blackwell's, Foyles, etc (Amazon is now regularly running out such is the demand) amazon.co.uk/Suicide-Nation…
English
@SamanthaTaghoy I won’t be buying a season egg from Cadburys. If it doesn’t say Easter then it ain’t an egg!!
English
Dear Cadbury,
“From Cadbury this season.”
What season?
Go on, say it.
It’s EASTER. You are selling EASTER eggs for the EASTER SEASON.
How dare you profit off a Christian holiday while erasing its Christian origins.
They are Easter eggs.
It is Easter.
Shame on you.
English
@SamanthaTaghoy @IsabelOakeshott You are pretending to be a ‘journalist’, Garth.
Attempt some basic research.
These eggs have the word Easter on them.
English
Thank you lefties. We are Number 4 on Amazon and the Founder’s Edition has just sold out … again. Keep driving the algorithm cheers 👍 The more people in Britain who read Suicide of a Nation the better. Then at least they will know the truth -> shorturl.at/NJIbm
English
They refuse to use the word Easter
This is being done on purpose
We all know who they're terrified of offending
English
@BasilTheGreat They’ll be terrified of not having a business soon I’m sure there’s plenty of useful idiots that will still buy them
English
@BasilTheGreat Now they are stuck on the shelves. They don’t say Easter so maybe Muzzies can eat them? 😂
English
@Swoqix @BasilTheGreat It’s literally in the video he posted.
Thicker than a submarine door.
English
@BasilTheGreat I will only support those who produce Easter eggs and not afraid to state that on the product.
English
@BasilTheGreat #BoycottCadbury until they put Easter back on the eggs.
English
@BasilTheGreat They literally use the word Easter in the fucking video you posted, you heaving fuck-wit.
English
@VacSafety You have not read the study you have posted the link to.
English
🚨 THE TRUTH IS UNDENIABLE. A massive new study from Oxford University, Harvard University and University of Bristol, covering over one million children, has delivered a staggering blow to the "safe and effective" narrative.
The findings? Myocarditis and pericarditis were found EXCLUSIVELY in vaccinated children. Among the million+ kids studied, not a single case of these heart conditions was found in the unvaccinated group.
For years, the establishment told us the risk was "minimal" or that the virus itself was more dangerous to the heart. This data proves otherwise. When you ignore the precautionary principle and bypass long-term safety testing, our children pay the price.
At VSRF, we’ve been demanding an honest look at this data for years. Now that the world's leading institutions are confirming these risks, will the "experts" finally be held #accountable? Will the mandates finally end for everyone for good?
It’s time to stop the propaganda and start protecting our kids. Share this everywhere because the data doesn't lie.
Read the full study here: #abstract1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
#OxfordStudy #VaccineSafety #Myocarditis #VSRF #InformedConsent #ProtectOurChildren #MedicalTransparency #BreakingNews
English
🚨CADBURY DITCHES EASTER: NOW SELLING “GESTURE EGGS” 🤬🍫
Britain’s 1,400-Year Christian Heritage Erased to Pandering to Certain Communities Who Might Get Upset ✝️
For more than fourteen centuries Britain has been a Christian nation.
Through invasions, wars, the Black Death, Reformation, civil war, two world wars, and every kind of hardship, one thing remained constant: the joyful celebration of Easter.
Yet in 2026 Cadbury, a brand built on British chocolate and long associated with Easter, has quietly removed the word “Easter” from its chocolate eggs in outlet stores.
They are now labelled Gesture Eggs” with the vague corporate line: “From Cadbury this season.”
What season exactly?
It is Easter.
These are Easter eggs.
They are sold for the Easter season.
Cadbury is perfectly happy to pocket record profits from the single biggest chocolate sales period of the year, a period driven almost entirely by the Christian festival of Easter, but apparently too frightened (or too cynical) to utter the word itself.
This is not an innocent rebrand. It is deliberate pandering to certain communities who might get upset at the sight of a Christian holiday being acknowledged. Another small but telling sign of how mass migration and the relentless push for “inclusivity” at any cost is slowly erasing English and British identity.
The same company that once proudly printed “Happy Easter” now seems allergic to the word.
Meanwhile the product itself has been quietly degraded for years: lower cocoa content, more palm oil and vegetable fat, less milk, smaller bars, higher prices. Now even the cultural meaning and name of the occasion they exploit is being scrubbed.
So Cadbury gets the Easter windfall while pretending Easter doesn’t exist so nobody, especially not newcomers or activist pressure groups, might feel momentarily uncomfortable.
That is cultural cowardice dressed in corporate PR.
They are Easter eggs.
It is Easter.
Say it.
Shame on Cadbury.
English
Dear Mr Khamenei
Here are the co-ordinates for Bradford
53.7938° N, 1.7564° W
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter
Katie Hopkins
English
