Eddy Walsh
12.8K posts





Russia is an integral part of Europe and cannot be its main threat. Peskov emphasized this in a conversation with Vesti journalist Zarubin. He emphasized that the European security architecture is unthinkable without taking into account Russia's interests and participation. ✔️ TASS Well, that's what I told you – Russia still hopes that "everything will be as before." I also think that everything will be as before, and that Russia really should cooperate with Europe. However, today, Peskov, Lavrov, and others point out that Europe is waging an open war against Russia. Therefore, to become part of Europe, Russia will first have to defeat Europe in war. You must remember that back in 2021, Europe rejected all Russian proposals for a new European security system that takes Russia's interests into account. Back then, the Europeans declared that Russia hadn't defeated them in war to demand this. Well, even today, Russia hasn't defeated anyone. So there's nothing to talk about.


Religious kids used to be noticeably happier than secular ones. After 2012, that gap exploded. Jonathan Haidt dropped this on The Daily Show: Religious children have built-in community, rituals, and traditions that anchor them. Secular kids, especially those handed phones and iPads early, are left floating without real roots. Haidt (who’s an atheist) says non-religious parents now have to work much harder to intentionally create stable social connections, because a network of strangers, bots, and algorithms is not a community — it’s crazy-making. In the smartphone era, the protective effect of community and ritual has weakened dramatically for everyone, but especially for kids growing up without traditional anchors. We traded thick, real-world belonging for thin digital freedom — and we’re watching a generation pay the price in anxiety and meaninglessness. Do you think religious community still gives kids a real advantage in 2025, or can intentional secular parents create equally strong roots without it? What’s worked (or failed) in your experience?









Sincere question: do Trump supporters who genuinely want to reduce political violence actually think that lobbing transparently hypocritical accusations about the left's rhetoric is in any way effective? Are we really gonna go through another cycle where MAGA folks point out incendiary rhetoric on the left without ever acknowledging that some of the most violent and incendiary rhetoric in America comes from the President and his supporters? Do you not think the rest of the country has eyes and ears? It's truly awful that President Trump has been the target of political violence. It's also truly awful how he's frequently talked about his political opponents: accusing them of treason, amplifying calls for their execution, publicly celebrating their death, calling them scum, garbage, vermin, animals. It was like 3 weeks ago that he threatened the annihilation of an entire civilization! It was just a few months ago that he and his White House knowingly smeared two Americans who'd been killed by federal agents as domestic terrorists! I hate political violence. I hate what happened last night. Probably 99% of Americans agree. But let's not insult everyone's intelligence by pretending that the most powerful person in the world isn't a huge part of the problem here.












